In search of causal variants: refining disease association signals using cross-population contrasts

• Main Authors: Rice John P, Hinrichs Anthony L, Grucza Richard A, Goate Alison M, Saccone Scott F, Saccone Nancy L, Bierut Laura J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2008-08-01
• Series: BMC Genetics
• Online Access: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/9/58

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Genome-wide association (GWA) using large numbers of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is now a powerful, state-of-the-art approach to mapping human disease genes. When a GWA study detects association between a SNP and the disease, this signal usually represents association with a set of several highly correlated SNPs in strong linkage disequilibrium. The challenge we address is to distinguish among these correlated loci to highlight potential functional variants and prioritize them for follow-up.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We implemented a systematic method for testing association across diverse population samples having differing histories and LD patterns, using a logistic regression framework. The hypothesis is that important underlying biological mechanisms are shared across human populations, and we can filter correlated variants by testing for heterogeneity of genetic effects in different population samples. This approach formalizes the descriptive comparison of p-values that has typified similar cross-population fine-mapping studies to date. We applied this method to correlated SNPs in the cholinergic nicotinic receptor gene cluster <it>CHRNA5-CHRNA3-CHRNB4</it>, in a case-control study of cocaine dependence composed of 504 European-American and 583 African-American samples. Of the 10 SNPs genotyped in the r²≥ 0.8 bin for <it>rs16969968</it>, three demonstrated significant cross-population heterogeneity and are filtered from priority follow-up; the remaining SNPs include <it>rs16969968 </it>(heterogeneity p = 0.75). Though the power to filter out rs16969968 is reduced due to the difference in allele frequency in the two groups, the results nevertheless focus attention on a smaller group of SNPs that includes the non-synonymous SNP rs16969968, which retains a similar effect size (odds ratio) across both population samples.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Filtering out SNPs that demonstrate cross-population heterogeneity enriches for variants more likely to be important and causative. Our approach provides an important and effective tool to help interpret results from the many GWA studies now underway.</p>