Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
BACKGROUND:Previous researches have shown that anesthetic techniques may influence the patients' outcomes after cancer surgery. Here, we studied the relationship between the type of anesthetic techniques and patients' outcomes following elective robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. METHOD...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230290 |
id |
doaj-95fbd7bc7e04421c9b0a39d6cf128011 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-95fbd7bc7e04421c9b0a39d6cf1280112021-03-03T21:36:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01153e023029010.1371/journal.pone.0230290Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Hou-Chuan LaiMeei-Shyuan LeeKuen-Tze LinYi-Hsuan HuangJen-Yin ChenYao-Tsung LinKuo-Chuan HungZhi-Fu WuBACKGROUND:Previous researches have shown that anesthetic techniques may influence the patients' outcomes after cancer surgery. Here, we studied the relationship between the type of anesthetic techniques and patients' outcomes following elective robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. METHODS:This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who received elective, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between January 2008 and December 2018. Patients were grouped according to the anesthesia they received, namely desflurane or propofol. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted, and survival curves were presented from the date of surgery to death. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to compare hazard ratios for death after propensity matching. Subgroup analyses were performed for tumor-node-metastasis stage and disease progression. The primary outcome was overall survival, and the secondary outcome was postoperative biochemical recurrence. RESULTS:A total of 365 patients (24 deaths, 7.0%) under desflurane anesthesia, and 266 patients (2 deaths, 1.0%) under propofol anesthesia were included. The all-cause mortality rate was significantly lower in the propofol anesthesia than in the desflurane anesthesia during follow-up (P = 0.001). Two hundred sixty-four patients remained in each group after propensity matching. The propofol anesthesia was associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.48; P = 0.003) in the matched analysis. Subgroup analyses showed that patients under propofol anesthesia had less postoperative biochemical recurrence than those under desflurane (hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.91; P = 0.038) in the matched analysis. CONCLUSIONS:Propofol anesthesia was associated with improved overall survival in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with desflurane anesthesia. In addition, patients under propofol anesthesia had less postoperative biochemical recurrence.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230290 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hou-Chuan Lai Meei-Shyuan Lee Kuen-Tze Lin Yi-Hsuan Huang Jen-Yin Chen Yao-Tsung Lin Kuo-Chuan Hung Zhi-Fu Wu |
spellingShingle |
Hou-Chuan Lai Meei-Shyuan Lee Kuen-Tze Lin Yi-Hsuan Huang Jen-Yin Chen Yao-Tsung Lin Kuo-Chuan Hung Zhi-Fu Wu Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Hou-Chuan Lai Meei-Shyuan Lee Kuen-Tze Lin Yi-Hsuan Huang Jen-Yin Chen Yao-Tsung Lin Kuo-Chuan Hung Zhi-Fu Wu |
author_sort |
Hou-Chuan Lai |
title |
Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. |
title_short |
Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. |
title_full |
Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. |
title_fullStr |
Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. |
title_sort |
propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
BACKGROUND:Previous researches have shown that anesthetic techniques may influence the patients' outcomes after cancer surgery. Here, we studied the relationship between the type of anesthetic techniques and patients' outcomes following elective robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. METHODS:This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who received elective, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between January 2008 and December 2018. Patients were grouped according to the anesthesia they received, namely desflurane or propofol. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted, and survival curves were presented from the date of surgery to death. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to compare hazard ratios for death after propensity matching. Subgroup analyses were performed for tumor-node-metastasis stage and disease progression. The primary outcome was overall survival, and the secondary outcome was postoperative biochemical recurrence. RESULTS:A total of 365 patients (24 deaths, 7.0%) under desflurane anesthesia, and 266 patients (2 deaths, 1.0%) under propofol anesthesia were included. The all-cause mortality rate was significantly lower in the propofol anesthesia than in the desflurane anesthesia during follow-up (P = 0.001). Two hundred sixty-four patients remained in each group after propensity matching. The propofol anesthesia was associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.48; P = 0.003) in the matched analysis. Subgroup analyses showed that patients under propofol anesthesia had less postoperative biochemical recurrence than those under desflurane (hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.91; P = 0.038) in the matched analysis. CONCLUSIONS:Propofol anesthesia was associated with improved overall survival in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with desflurane anesthesia. In addition, patients under propofol anesthesia had less postoperative biochemical recurrence. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230290 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT houchuanlai propofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaisassociatedwithbettersurvivalthandesfluraneanesthesiainrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy AT meeishyuanlee propofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaisassociatedwithbettersurvivalthandesfluraneanesthesiainrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy AT kuentzelin propofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaisassociatedwithbettersurvivalthandesfluraneanesthesiainrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy AT yihsuanhuang propofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaisassociatedwithbettersurvivalthandesfluraneanesthesiainrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy AT jenyinchen propofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaisassociatedwithbettersurvivalthandesfluraneanesthesiainrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy AT yaotsunglin propofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaisassociatedwithbettersurvivalthandesfluraneanesthesiainrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy AT kuochuanhung propofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaisassociatedwithbettersurvivalthandesfluraneanesthesiainrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy AT zhifuwu propofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaisassociatedwithbettersurvivalthandesfluraneanesthesiainrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy |
_version_ |
1714816062479925248 |