The ortholog conjecture is untestable by the current gene ontology but is supported by RNA sequencing data.
The ortholog conjecture posits that orthologous genes are functionally more similar than paralogous genes. This conjecture is a cornerstone of phylogenomics and is used daily by both computational and experimental biologists in predicting, interpreting, and understanding gene functions. A recent stu...
Main Authors: | Xiaoshu Chen, Jianzhi Zhang |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS Computational Biology |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3510086?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
Correction: The Ortholog Conjecture Is Untestable by the Current Gene Ontology but Is Supported by RNA Sequencing Data.
by: Xiaoshu Chen, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Testing the ortholog conjecture with comparative functional genomic data from mammals.
by: Nathan L Nehrt, et al.
Published: (2011-06-01) -
Untestable Fault Identification Using Implications
by: Syal, Manan
Published: (2014) -
Resolving the ortholog conjecture: orthologs tend to be weakly, but significantly, more similar in function than paralogs.
by: Adrian M Altenhoff, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01) -
Sensitivity Analysis of Untestable Assumptions in Causal Inference
by: Lundin, Mathias
Published: (2011)