Materiality in Public Sector Financial Audit: International Practice and the Opinion of Brazilian Experts

Materiality in private sector financial audit is a topic that has been relatively well developed in the literature. Specific research in this regard in public sector auditing, on the other hand, is scarce at the international level and absent in Brazil. In view of this, the purpose of this study was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juliane Madeira Leitão, José Alves Dantas
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade de Brasília 2016-04-01
Series:Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cgg-amg.unb.br/index.php/contabil/article/view/936
id doaj-95e9a011ac624ea6a0b11eab0aaff15a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-95e9a011ac624ea6a0b11eab0aaff15a2020-11-24T22:33:28ZporUniversidade de BrasíliaContabilidade, Gestão e Governança1984-39251984-39252016-04-01191146166327Materiality in Public Sector Financial Audit: International Practice and the Opinion of Brazilian ExpertsJuliane Madeira Leitão0José Alves Dantas1Tribunal de Contas da União (TCU)Universidade de Brasília (UnB)Materiality in private sector financial audit is a topic that has been relatively well developed in the literature. Specific research in this regard in public sector auditing, on the other hand, is scarce at the international level and absent in Brazil. In view of this, the purpose of this study was to identify the parameters used to determine materiality in public sector financial audit. To this end, we sent questionnaires to the 192 Supreme Audit Institutions that are members of INTOSAI and to 36 Brazilian public auditors, specialists in financial audit, who are staff members of the TCU or the CGU seeking information with respect to the Institutions’ guidelines and the auditors’ perceptions about materiality. Results reveal that expenditures, revenues and total assets are the benchmarks most recommended by respondents for defining materiality in the public sector. In addition, they recommended the adoption of percentages of up to 2% for each of these parameters in defining what is material. It was observed, as well, especially with respect to the effectiveness of internal control and to public expectations or interests, that qualitative aspects should be also taken into account in determining materiality, although a lesser degree of importance is attributed to this than to the quantitative aspects,. The study contributes to the accounting literature on the development of audits, particularly with respect to the use of a concept, materiality, that is always emphasized in professional standards, but about which there are few objective guidelines.https://cgg-amg.unb.br/index.php/contabil/article/view/936Auditoria FinanceiraSetor públicoMaterialidadeEntidades de Fiscalização SuperiorINTOSAI
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Juliane Madeira Leitão
José Alves Dantas
spellingShingle Juliane Madeira Leitão
José Alves Dantas
Materiality in Public Sector Financial Audit: International Practice and the Opinion of Brazilian Experts
Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
Auditoria Financeira
Setor público
Materialidade
Entidades de Fiscalização Superior
INTOSAI
author_facet Juliane Madeira Leitão
José Alves Dantas
author_sort Juliane Madeira Leitão
title Materiality in Public Sector Financial Audit: International Practice and the Opinion of Brazilian Experts
title_short Materiality in Public Sector Financial Audit: International Practice and the Opinion of Brazilian Experts
title_full Materiality in Public Sector Financial Audit: International Practice and the Opinion of Brazilian Experts
title_fullStr Materiality in Public Sector Financial Audit: International Practice and the Opinion of Brazilian Experts
title_full_unstemmed Materiality in Public Sector Financial Audit: International Practice and the Opinion of Brazilian Experts
title_sort materiality in public sector financial audit: international practice and the opinion of brazilian experts
publisher Universidade de Brasília
series Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
issn 1984-3925
1984-3925
publishDate 2016-04-01
description Materiality in private sector financial audit is a topic that has been relatively well developed in the literature. Specific research in this regard in public sector auditing, on the other hand, is scarce at the international level and absent in Brazil. In view of this, the purpose of this study was to identify the parameters used to determine materiality in public sector financial audit. To this end, we sent questionnaires to the 192 Supreme Audit Institutions that are members of INTOSAI and to 36 Brazilian public auditors, specialists in financial audit, who are staff members of the TCU or the CGU seeking information with respect to the Institutions’ guidelines and the auditors’ perceptions about materiality. Results reveal that expenditures, revenues and total assets are the benchmarks most recommended by respondents for defining materiality in the public sector. In addition, they recommended the adoption of percentages of up to 2% for each of these parameters in defining what is material. It was observed, as well, especially with respect to the effectiveness of internal control and to public expectations or interests, that qualitative aspects should be also taken into account in determining materiality, although a lesser degree of importance is attributed to this than to the quantitative aspects,. The study contributes to the accounting literature on the development of audits, particularly with respect to the use of a concept, materiality, that is always emphasized in professional standards, but about which there are few objective guidelines.
topic Auditoria Financeira
Setor público
Materialidade
Entidades de Fiscalização Superior
INTOSAI
url https://cgg-amg.unb.br/index.php/contabil/article/view/936
work_keys_str_mv AT julianemadeiraleitao materialityinpublicsectorfinancialauditinternationalpracticeandtheopinionofbrazilianexperts
AT josealvesdantas materialityinpublicsectorfinancialauditinternationalpracticeandtheopinionofbrazilianexperts
_version_ 1725730856957378560