Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control: A latent Variable Analysis

Inhibitory control represents a central component of executive functions and focuses on the ability to actively inhibit or delay a dominant response to achieve a goal. Although various tasks exist to measure inhibitory control, correlations between these tasks are rather small, partly because of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne Gärtner, Alexander Strobel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2021-02-01
Series:Journal of Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/150
id doaj-95df9ff129b14970a60680921c45d81b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-95df9ff129b14970a60680921c45d81b2021-03-16T05:04:57ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Cognition2514-48202021-02-014110.5334/joc.150164Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control: A latent Variable AnalysisAnne Gärtner0Alexander Strobel1Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, DresdenFaculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, DresdenInhibitory control represents a central component of executive functions and focuses on the ability to actively inhibit or delay a dominant response to achieve a goal. Although various tasks exist to measure inhibitory control, correlations between these tasks are rather small, partly because of the task impurity problem. To alleviate this problem, a latent variable approach has been previously applied and two closely related yet separable functions have been identified: prepotent response inhibition and resistance to distractor interference. The goal of our study was a) to replicate the proposed structure of inhibitory control and b) to extend previous literature by additionally accounting for speed-accuracy trade-offs, thereby potentially increasing explained variance in the investigated latent factors. To this end, 190 participants completed six inhibitory control tasks (antisaccade task, Stroop task, stop-signal task, flanker task, shape-matching task, word-naming task). Analyses were conducted using standard scores as well as inverse efficiency scores (combining response times and error rates). In line with previous studies, we generally found low zero-order correlations between the six tasks. By applying confirmatory factor analysis using standard reaction time difference scores, we were not able to replicate a satisfactory model with good fit to the data. By using inverse efficiency scores, a two-related-factor and a one-factor model emerged that resembled previous literature, but only four out of six tasks demonstrated significant factor loadings. Our results highlight the difficulty in finding robust inter-correlations between commonly used inhibitory control tasks, even when applying a latent variable analysis and accounting for speed-accuracy trade-offs.https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/150inhibitory controlinhibitionlatent variable approachindividual differencesinverse efficiency scoresconfirmatory factor analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anne Gärtner
Alexander Strobel
spellingShingle Anne Gärtner
Alexander Strobel
Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control: A latent Variable Analysis
Journal of Cognition
inhibitory control
inhibition
latent variable approach
individual differences
inverse efficiency scores
confirmatory factor analysis
author_facet Anne Gärtner
Alexander Strobel
author_sort Anne Gärtner
title Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control: A latent Variable Analysis
title_short Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control: A latent Variable Analysis
title_full Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control: A latent Variable Analysis
title_fullStr Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control: A latent Variable Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control: A latent Variable Analysis
title_sort individual differences in inhibitory control: a latent variable analysis
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Journal of Cognition
issn 2514-4820
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Inhibitory control represents a central component of executive functions and focuses on the ability to actively inhibit or delay a dominant response to achieve a goal. Although various tasks exist to measure inhibitory control, correlations between these tasks are rather small, partly because of the task impurity problem. To alleviate this problem, a latent variable approach has been previously applied and two closely related yet separable functions have been identified: prepotent response inhibition and resistance to distractor interference. The goal of our study was a) to replicate the proposed structure of inhibitory control and b) to extend previous literature by additionally accounting for speed-accuracy trade-offs, thereby potentially increasing explained variance in the investigated latent factors. To this end, 190 participants completed six inhibitory control tasks (antisaccade task, Stroop task, stop-signal task, flanker task, shape-matching task, word-naming task). Analyses were conducted using standard scores as well as inverse efficiency scores (combining response times and error rates). In line with previous studies, we generally found low zero-order correlations between the six tasks. By applying confirmatory factor analysis using standard reaction time difference scores, we were not able to replicate a satisfactory model with good fit to the data. By using inverse efficiency scores, a two-related-factor and a one-factor model emerged that resembled previous literature, but only four out of six tasks demonstrated significant factor loadings. Our results highlight the difficulty in finding robust inter-correlations between commonly used inhibitory control tasks, even when applying a latent variable analysis and accounting for speed-accuracy trade-offs.
topic inhibitory control
inhibition
latent variable approach
individual differences
inverse efficiency scores
confirmatory factor analysis
url https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/150
work_keys_str_mv AT annegartner individualdifferencesininhibitorycontrolalatentvariableanalysis
AT alexanderstrobel individualdifferencesininhibitorycontrolalatentvariableanalysis
_version_ 1724220016268673024