The specificity of attentional biases by type of gambling: An eye-tracking study.

A growing body of research indicates that gamblers develop an attentional bias for gambling-related stimuli. Compared to research on substance use, however, few studies have examined attentional biases in gamblers using eye-gaze tracking, which has many advantages over other measures of attention. I...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel S McGrath, Amadeus Meitner, Christopher R Sears
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5791982?pdf=render
id doaj-95c79974452440a48129b94b18ae804a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-95c79974452440a48129b94b18ae804a2020-11-25T01:22:08ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01131e019061410.1371/journal.pone.0190614The specificity of attentional biases by type of gambling: An eye-tracking study.Daniel S McGrathAmadeus MeitnerChristopher R SearsA growing body of research indicates that gamblers develop an attentional bias for gambling-related stimuli. Compared to research on substance use, however, few studies have examined attentional biases in gamblers using eye-gaze tracking, which has many advantages over other measures of attention. In addition, previous studies of attentional biases in gamblers have not directly matched type of gambler with personally-relevant gambling cues. The present study investigated the specificity of attentional biases for individual types of gambling using an eye-gaze tracking paradigm. Three groups of participants (poker players, video lottery terminal/slot machine players, and non-gambling controls) took part in one test session in which they viewed 25 sets of four images (poker, VLTs/slot machines, bingo, and board games). Participants' eye fixations were recorded throughout each 8-second presentation of the four images. The results indicated that, as predicted, the two gambling groups preferentially attended to their primary form of gambling, whereas control participants attended to board games more than gambling images. The findings have clinical implications for the treatment of individuals with gambling disorder. Understanding the importance of personally-salient gambling cues will inform the development of effective attentional bias modification treatments for problem gamblers.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5791982?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel S McGrath
Amadeus Meitner
Christopher R Sears
spellingShingle Daniel S McGrath
Amadeus Meitner
Christopher R Sears
The specificity of attentional biases by type of gambling: An eye-tracking study.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Daniel S McGrath
Amadeus Meitner
Christopher R Sears
author_sort Daniel S McGrath
title The specificity of attentional biases by type of gambling: An eye-tracking study.
title_short The specificity of attentional biases by type of gambling: An eye-tracking study.
title_full The specificity of attentional biases by type of gambling: An eye-tracking study.
title_fullStr The specificity of attentional biases by type of gambling: An eye-tracking study.
title_full_unstemmed The specificity of attentional biases by type of gambling: An eye-tracking study.
title_sort specificity of attentional biases by type of gambling: an eye-tracking study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description A growing body of research indicates that gamblers develop an attentional bias for gambling-related stimuli. Compared to research on substance use, however, few studies have examined attentional biases in gamblers using eye-gaze tracking, which has many advantages over other measures of attention. In addition, previous studies of attentional biases in gamblers have not directly matched type of gambler with personally-relevant gambling cues. The present study investigated the specificity of attentional biases for individual types of gambling using an eye-gaze tracking paradigm. Three groups of participants (poker players, video lottery terminal/slot machine players, and non-gambling controls) took part in one test session in which they viewed 25 sets of four images (poker, VLTs/slot machines, bingo, and board games). Participants' eye fixations were recorded throughout each 8-second presentation of the four images. The results indicated that, as predicted, the two gambling groups preferentially attended to their primary form of gambling, whereas control participants attended to board games more than gambling images. The findings have clinical implications for the treatment of individuals with gambling disorder. Understanding the importance of personally-salient gambling cues will inform the development of effective attentional bias modification treatments for problem gamblers.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5791982?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT danielsmcgrath thespecificityofattentionalbiasesbytypeofgamblinganeyetrackingstudy
AT amadeusmeitner thespecificityofattentionalbiasesbytypeofgamblinganeyetrackingstudy
AT christopherrsears thespecificityofattentionalbiasesbytypeofgamblinganeyetrackingstudy
AT danielsmcgrath specificityofattentionalbiasesbytypeofgamblinganeyetrackingstudy
AT amadeusmeitner specificityofattentionalbiasesbytypeofgamblinganeyetrackingstudy
AT christopherrsears specificityofattentionalbiasesbytypeofgamblinganeyetrackingstudy
_version_ 1725127586384707584