Candida dubliniensis: an appraisal of its clinical significance as a bloodstream pathogen.

A nine-year prospective study (2002-2010) on the prevalence of Candida dubliniensis among Candida bloodstream isolates is presented. The germ tube positive isolates were provisionally identified as C. dubliniensis by presence of fringed and rough colonies on sunflower seed agar. Subsequently, their...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ziauddin Khan, Suhail Ahmad, Leena Joseph, Rachel Chandy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3292580?pdf=render
id doaj-95be33e8eb89496583cd38304d1bcd3a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-95be33e8eb89496583cd38304d1bcd3a2020-11-25T01:46:01ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0173e3295210.1371/journal.pone.0032952Candida dubliniensis: an appraisal of its clinical significance as a bloodstream pathogen.Ziauddin KhanSuhail AhmadLeena JosephRachel ChandyA nine-year prospective study (2002-2010) on the prevalence of Candida dubliniensis among Candida bloodstream isolates is presented. The germ tube positive isolates were provisionally identified as C. dubliniensis by presence of fringed and rough colonies on sunflower seed agar. Subsequently, their identity was confirmed by Vitek2 Yeast identification system and/or by amplification and sequencing of the ITS region of rDNA. In all, 368 isolates were identified as C. dubliniensis; 67.1% came from respiratory specimens, 11.7% from oral swabs, 9.2% from urine, 3.8% from blood, 2.7% from vaginal swabs and 5.4% from other sources. All C. dubliniensis isolates tested by Etest were susceptible to voriconazole and amphotericin B. Resistance to fluconazole (≥8 µg/ml) was observed in 2.5% of C. dubliniensis isolates, 7 of which occurred between 2008-2010. Of note was the diagnosis of C. dubliniensis candidemia in 14 patients, 11 of them occurring between 2008-2010. None of the bloodstream isolate was resistant to fluconazole, while a solitary isolate showed increased MIC to 5-flucytosine (>32 µg/ml) and belonged to genotype 4. A review of literature since 1999 revealed 28 additional cases of C. dubliniensis candidemia, and 167 isolates identified from blood cultures since 1982. In conclusion, this study highlights a greater role of C. dubliniensis in bloodstream infections than hitherto recognized.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3292580?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ziauddin Khan
Suhail Ahmad
Leena Joseph
Rachel Chandy
spellingShingle Ziauddin Khan
Suhail Ahmad
Leena Joseph
Rachel Chandy
Candida dubliniensis: an appraisal of its clinical significance as a bloodstream pathogen.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ziauddin Khan
Suhail Ahmad
Leena Joseph
Rachel Chandy
author_sort Ziauddin Khan
title Candida dubliniensis: an appraisal of its clinical significance as a bloodstream pathogen.
title_short Candida dubliniensis: an appraisal of its clinical significance as a bloodstream pathogen.
title_full Candida dubliniensis: an appraisal of its clinical significance as a bloodstream pathogen.
title_fullStr Candida dubliniensis: an appraisal of its clinical significance as a bloodstream pathogen.
title_full_unstemmed Candida dubliniensis: an appraisal of its clinical significance as a bloodstream pathogen.
title_sort candida dubliniensis: an appraisal of its clinical significance as a bloodstream pathogen.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description A nine-year prospective study (2002-2010) on the prevalence of Candida dubliniensis among Candida bloodstream isolates is presented. The germ tube positive isolates were provisionally identified as C. dubliniensis by presence of fringed and rough colonies on sunflower seed agar. Subsequently, their identity was confirmed by Vitek2 Yeast identification system and/or by amplification and sequencing of the ITS region of rDNA. In all, 368 isolates were identified as C. dubliniensis; 67.1% came from respiratory specimens, 11.7% from oral swabs, 9.2% from urine, 3.8% from blood, 2.7% from vaginal swabs and 5.4% from other sources. All C. dubliniensis isolates tested by Etest were susceptible to voriconazole and amphotericin B. Resistance to fluconazole (≥8 µg/ml) was observed in 2.5% of C. dubliniensis isolates, 7 of which occurred between 2008-2010. Of note was the diagnosis of C. dubliniensis candidemia in 14 patients, 11 of them occurring between 2008-2010. None of the bloodstream isolate was resistant to fluconazole, while a solitary isolate showed increased MIC to 5-flucytosine (>32 µg/ml) and belonged to genotype 4. A review of literature since 1999 revealed 28 additional cases of C. dubliniensis candidemia, and 167 isolates identified from blood cultures since 1982. In conclusion, this study highlights a greater role of C. dubliniensis in bloodstream infections than hitherto recognized.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3292580?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ziauddinkhan candidadubliniensisanappraisalofitsclinicalsignificanceasabloodstreampathogen
AT suhailahmad candidadubliniensisanappraisalofitsclinicalsignificanceasabloodstreampathogen
AT leenajoseph candidadubliniensisanappraisalofitsclinicalsignificanceasabloodstreampathogen
AT rachelchandy candidadubliniensisanappraisalofitsclinicalsignificanceasabloodstreampathogen
_version_ 1725021196060196864