Utang dan Pengakhiran Perjanjian Secarap Sepihak (Studi Kasus Perjanjian Konsultan PT. Garuda dan PT. Magnus

<em>This article aims to analyze the existence of the debt in reciprocal agreement between PT. Garuda and PT. Magnus, and about the termination of agreement which set aside article 1266 Civil Law unilaterally whether could cancel debt payment obligation or not. This research is normative resea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Awalia Noviyanti, Mukti Fajar Nur Dewanto
Format: Article
Language:Indonesian
Published: Universitas Ahmad Dahlan 2018-02-01
Series:Jurnal Hukum Novelty
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/Novelty/article/view/9223
id doaj-958c804b3538414c9ddd350fbf6edd61
record_format Article
spelling doaj-958c804b3538414c9ddd350fbf6edd612021-05-31T08:13:04ZindUniversitas Ahmad DahlanJurnal Hukum Novelty1412-68342550-00902018-02-019111812810.26555/novelty.v9i1.a92234708Utang dan Pengakhiran Perjanjian Secarap Sepihak (Studi Kasus Perjanjian Konsultan PT. Garuda dan PT. MagnusAwalia Noviyanti0Mukti Fajar Nur Dewanto1Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah YogyakartaFakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta<em>This article aims to analyze the existence of the debt in reciprocal agreement between PT. Garuda and PT. Magnus, and about the termination of agreement which set aside article 1266 Civil Law unilaterally whether could cancel debt payment obligation or not. This research is normative research which observes the data that correlated to agreement, debt, act againts the law, and termination of agreement which set aside the article 1266 Civil Law. The approach of this article is statute approach which review the data that have correlation with law of agreement and termination of agreement,</em> <em>and</em> <em>case approach. It is the case of PT. Garuda and PT. Magnus. The data collection was done by library research that observing the data about law of agreement and termination of agreement. The result of research shows that there must be approval from each party in reciprocal agreement. Thus, the debt of PT. Garuda to PT. Magnus is the obligation that must be fulfilled due to PT. Magnus has worked maximally to complete its obligation. In other side, the termination of law which set aside article 1266 Civil Law is act againts the law, therefore the obligation to pay the debt must be done, in the reason of there is indemnification in act againts the law.</em>http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/Novelty/article/view/9223debt agreementact against the lawindonesian civil law
collection DOAJ
language Indonesian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Awalia Noviyanti
Mukti Fajar Nur Dewanto
spellingShingle Awalia Noviyanti
Mukti Fajar Nur Dewanto
Utang dan Pengakhiran Perjanjian Secarap Sepihak (Studi Kasus Perjanjian Konsultan PT. Garuda dan PT. Magnus
Jurnal Hukum Novelty
debt agreement
act against the law
indonesian civil law
author_facet Awalia Noviyanti
Mukti Fajar Nur Dewanto
author_sort Awalia Noviyanti
title Utang dan Pengakhiran Perjanjian Secarap Sepihak (Studi Kasus Perjanjian Konsultan PT. Garuda dan PT. Magnus
title_short Utang dan Pengakhiran Perjanjian Secarap Sepihak (Studi Kasus Perjanjian Konsultan PT. Garuda dan PT. Magnus
title_full Utang dan Pengakhiran Perjanjian Secarap Sepihak (Studi Kasus Perjanjian Konsultan PT. Garuda dan PT. Magnus
title_fullStr Utang dan Pengakhiran Perjanjian Secarap Sepihak (Studi Kasus Perjanjian Konsultan PT. Garuda dan PT. Magnus
title_full_unstemmed Utang dan Pengakhiran Perjanjian Secarap Sepihak (Studi Kasus Perjanjian Konsultan PT. Garuda dan PT. Magnus
title_sort utang dan pengakhiran perjanjian secarap sepihak (studi kasus perjanjian konsultan pt. garuda dan pt. magnus
publisher Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
series Jurnal Hukum Novelty
issn 1412-6834
2550-0090
publishDate 2018-02-01
description <em>This article aims to analyze the existence of the debt in reciprocal agreement between PT. Garuda and PT. Magnus, and about the termination of agreement which set aside article 1266 Civil Law unilaterally whether could cancel debt payment obligation or not. This research is normative research which observes the data that correlated to agreement, debt, act againts the law, and termination of agreement which set aside the article 1266 Civil Law. The approach of this article is statute approach which review the data that have correlation with law of agreement and termination of agreement,</em> <em>and</em> <em>case approach. It is the case of PT. Garuda and PT. Magnus. The data collection was done by library research that observing the data about law of agreement and termination of agreement. The result of research shows that there must be approval from each party in reciprocal agreement. Thus, the debt of PT. Garuda to PT. Magnus is the obligation that must be fulfilled due to PT. Magnus has worked maximally to complete its obligation. In other side, the termination of law which set aside article 1266 Civil Law is act againts the law, therefore the obligation to pay the debt must be done, in the reason of there is indemnification in act againts the law.</em>
topic debt agreement
act against the law
indonesian civil law
url http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/Novelty/article/view/9223
work_keys_str_mv AT awalianoviyanti utangdanpengakhiranperjanjiansecarapsepihakstudikasusperjanjiankonsultanptgarudadanptmagnus
AT muktifajarnurdewanto utangdanpengakhiranperjanjiansecarapsepihakstudikasusperjanjiankonsultanptgarudadanptmagnus
_version_ 1721419184346234880