Deep Disagreement and Patience as an Argumentative Virtue

During a year when there is much tumult around the world and in the United States in particular, it might be surprising to encounter a paper about patience and argumentation. In this paper, I explore the notion of deep disagreement, with an eye to moral and political contexts in particular, in orde...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kathryn Phillips
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2021-03-01
Series:Informal Logic
Online Access:https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/6689
id doaj-9583605d774a415d9a1d41abbe3e2236
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9583605d774a415d9a1d41abbe3e22362021-03-04T18:00:04ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25772293-734X2021-03-0141110.22329/il.v41i1.6689Deep Disagreement and Patience as an Argumentative VirtueKathryn Phillips During a year when there is much tumult around the world and in the United States in particular, it might be surprising to encounter a paper about patience and argumentation. In this paper, I explore the notion of deep disagreement, with an eye to moral and political contexts in particular, in order to motivate the idea that patience is an argumentative virtue that we ought to cultivate. This is particularly so because of the extended nature of argumentation and the slow rate at which we change our minds. I raise a concern about how calls for patience have been misused in the past and argue that if we accept patience as an argumentative virtue, we should hold people in positions of power, in particular, to account. https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/6689
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kathryn Phillips
spellingShingle Kathryn Phillips
Deep Disagreement and Patience as an Argumentative Virtue
Informal Logic
author_facet Kathryn Phillips
author_sort Kathryn Phillips
title Deep Disagreement and Patience as an Argumentative Virtue
title_short Deep Disagreement and Patience as an Argumentative Virtue
title_full Deep Disagreement and Patience as an Argumentative Virtue
title_fullStr Deep Disagreement and Patience as an Argumentative Virtue
title_full_unstemmed Deep Disagreement and Patience as an Argumentative Virtue
title_sort deep disagreement and patience as an argumentative virtue
publisher University of Windsor
series Informal Logic
issn 0824-2577
2293-734X
publishDate 2021-03-01
description During a year when there is much tumult around the world and in the United States in particular, it might be surprising to encounter a paper about patience and argumentation. In this paper, I explore the notion of deep disagreement, with an eye to moral and political contexts in particular, in order to motivate the idea that patience is an argumentative virtue that we ought to cultivate. This is particularly so because of the extended nature of argumentation and the slow rate at which we change our minds. I raise a concern about how calls for patience have been misused in the past and argue that if we accept patience as an argumentative virtue, we should hold people in positions of power, in particular, to account.
url https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/6689
work_keys_str_mv AT kathrynphillips deepdisagreementandpatienceasanargumentativevirtue
_version_ 1724231718922092544