A modified method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades

Failure mode and effects analysis is an important methodology, which has been extensively used to evaluate the potential failures, errors, or risks in a system, design, or process. The traditional method utilizes the risk priority number ranking system. This method determines the risk priority numbe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wen Jiang, Chunhe Xie, Boya Wei, Deyun Zhou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-04-01
Series:Advances in Mechanical Engineering
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016644579
id doaj-9580abf303574d52bf2178067625b258
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9580abf303574d52bf2178067625b2582020-11-25T03:43:48ZengSAGE PublishingAdvances in Mechanical Engineering1687-81402016-04-01810.1177/168781401664457910.1177_1687814016644579A modified method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor bladesWen JiangChunhe XieBoya WeiDeyun ZhouFailure mode and effects analysis is an important methodology, which has been extensively used to evaluate the potential failures, errors, or risks in a system, design, or process. The traditional method utilizes the risk priority number ranking system. This method determines the risk priority number by multiplying failure factor values. Dempster–Shafer evidence theory has been combined with failure mode and effects analysis due to its effectiveness in dealing with uncertain and subjective information. However, since the risk evaluation of different experts may be different and some even conflict with each other, Dempster’s combination rule may become invalid. In this article, for better performance of application of evidence theory in failure mode and effects analysis, a modified method is proposed to reassign the basic believe assignment taking into consideration a reliability coefficient based on evidence distance. We illustrate several numerical examples and use the modified method to obtain the risk priority numbers for risk evaluation in failure modes of aircraft engine rotor blades. The results show that the proposed method is more reasonable and effective for real applications.https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016644579
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wen Jiang
Chunhe Xie
Boya Wei
Deyun Zhou
spellingShingle Wen Jiang
Chunhe Xie
Boya Wei
Deyun Zhou
A modified method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades
Advances in Mechanical Engineering
author_facet Wen Jiang
Chunhe Xie
Boya Wei
Deyun Zhou
author_sort Wen Jiang
title A modified method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades
title_short A modified method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades
title_full A modified method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades
title_fullStr A modified method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades
title_full_unstemmed A modified method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades
title_sort modified method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Advances in Mechanical Engineering
issn 1687-8140
publishDate 2016-04-01
description Failure mode and effects analysis is an important methodology, which has been extensively used to evaluate the potential failures, errors, or risks in a system, design, or process. The traditional method utilizes the risk priority number ranking system. This method determines the risk priority number by multiplying failure factor values. Dempster–Shafer evidence theory has been combined with failure mode and effects analysis due to its effectiveness in dealing with uncertain and subjective information. However, since the risk evaluation of different experts may be different and some even conflict with each other, Dempster’s combination rule may become invalid. In this article, for better performance of application of evidence theory in failure mode and effects analysis, a modified method is proposed to reassign the basic believe assignment taking into consideration a reliability coefficient based on evidence distance. We illustrate several numerical examples and use the modified method to obtain the risk priority numbers for risk evaluation in failure modes of aircraft engine rotor blades. The results show that the proposed method is more reasonable and effective for real applications.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016644579
work_keys_str_mv AT wenjiang amodifiedmethodforriskevaluationinfailuremodesandeffectsanalysisofaircraftturbinerotorblades
AT chunhexie amodifiedmethodforriskevaluationinfailuremodesandeffectsanalysisofaircraftturbinerotorblades
AT boyawei amodifiedmethodforriskevaluationinfailuremodesandeffectsanalysisofaircraftturbinerotorblades
AT deyunzhou amodifiedmethodforriskevaluationinfailuremodesandeffectsanalysisofaircraftturbinerotorblades
AT wenjiang modifiedmethodforriskevaluationinfailuremodesandeffectsanalysisofaircraftturbinerotorblades
AT chunhexie modifiedmethodforriskevaluationinfailuremodesandeffectsanalysisofaircraftturbinerotorblades
AT boyawei modifiedmethodforriskevaluationinfailuremodesandeffectsanalysisofaircraftturbinerotorblades
AT deyunzhou modifiedmethodforriskevaluationinfailuremodesandeffectsanalysisofaircraftturbinerotorblades
_version_ 1724518327681810432