A modified method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades
Failure mode and effects analysis is an important methodology, which has been extensively used to evaluate the potential failures, errors, or risks in a system, design, or process. The traditional method utilizes the risk priority number ranking system. This method determines the risk priority numbe...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2016-04-01
|
Series: | Advances in Mechanical Engineering |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016644579 |
id |
doaj-9580abf303574d52bf2178067625b258 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9580abf303574d52bf2178067625b2582020-11-25T03:43:48ZengSAGE PublishingAdvances in Mechanical Engineering1687-81402016-04-01810.1177/168781401664457910.1177_1687814016644579A modified method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor bladesWen JiangChunhe XieBoya WeiDeyun ZhouFailure mode and effects analysis is an important methodology, which has been extensively used to evaluate the potential failures, errors, or risks in a system, design, or process. The traditional method utilizes the risk priority number ranking system. This method determines the risk priority number by multiplying failure factor values. Dempster–Shafer evidence theory has been combined with failure mode and effects analysis due to its effectiveness in dealing with uncertain and subjective information. However, since the risk evaluation of different experts may be different and some even conflict with each other, Dempster’s combination rule may become invalid. In this article, for better performance of application of evidence theory in failure mode and effects analysis, a modified method is proposed to reassign the basic believe assignment taking into consideration a reliability coefficient based on evidence distance. We illustrate several numerical examples and use the modified method to obtain the risk priority numbers for risk evaluation in failure modes of aircraft engine rotor blades. The results show that the proposed method is more reasonable and effective for real applications.https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016644579 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Wen Jiang Chunhe Xie Boya Wei Deyun Zhou |
spellingShingle |
Wen Jiang Chunhe Xie Boya Wei Deyun Zhou A modified method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades Advances in Mechanical Engineering |
author_facet |
Wen Jiang Chunhe Xie Boya Wei Deyun Zhou |
author_sort |
Wen Jiang |
title |
A modified method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades |
title_short |
A modified method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades |
title_full |
A modified method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades |
title_fullStr |
A modified method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades |
title_full_unstemmed |
A modified method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades |
title_sort |
modified method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Advances in Mechanical Engineering |
issn |
1687-8140 |
publishDate |
2016-04-01 |
description |
Failure mode and effects analysis is an important methodology, which has been extensively used to evaluate the potential failures, errors, or risks in a system, design, or process. The traditional method utilizes the risk priority number ranking system. This method determines the risk priority number by multiplying failure factor values. Dempster–Shafer evidence theory has been combined with failure mode and effects analysis due to its effectiveness in dealing with uncertain and subjective information. However, since the risk evaluation of different experts may be different and some even conflict with each other, Dempster’s combination rule may become invalid. In this article, for better performance of application of evidence theory in failure mode and effects analysis, a modified method is proposed to reassign the basic believe assignment taking into consideration a reliability coefficient based on evidence distance. We illustrate several numerical examples and use the modified method to obtain the risk priority numbers for risk evaluation in failure modes of aircraft engine rotor blades. The results show that the proposed method is more reasonable and effective for real applications. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016644579 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wenjiang amodifiedmethodforriskevaluationinfailuremodesandeffectsanalysisofaircraftturbinerotorblades AT chunhexie amodifiedmethodforriskevaluationinfailuremodesandeffectsanalysisofaircraftturbinerotorblades AT boyawei amodifiedmethodforriskevaluationinfailuremodesandeffectsanalysisofaircraftturbinerotorblades AT deyunzhou amodifiedmethodforriskevaluationinfailuremodesandeffectsanalysisofaircraftturbinerotorblades AT wenjiang modifiedmethodforriskevaluationinfailuremodesandeffectsanalysisofaircraftturbinerotorblades AT chunhexie modifiedmethodforriskevaluationinfailuremodesandeffectsanalysisofaircraftturbinerotorblades AT boyawei modifiedmethodforriskevaluationinfailuremodesandeffectsanalysisofaircraftturbinerotorblades AT deyunzhou modifiedmethodforriskevaluationinfailuremodesandeffectsanalysisofaircraftturbinerotorblades |
_version_ |
1724518327681810432 |