Eheliches Glück und Störungen der sexuellen Genussfähigkeit in Medizin und Psychoanalyse 1890–1920

Disorders of sexual desire in couples appear in the wake of an ›eroticization‹ of the marital couple in the late 19th century. In the paper the formulation of new pathologies of sexual desire and satisfaction in german-speaking medicine and psychoanalysis is not understood as a self-referenti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Christa Putz
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: StudienVerlag 2007-08-01
Series:Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften
Online Access:https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/oezg/article/view/3964
id doaj-957571dbbf5a4429843275ec30d85937
record_format Article
spelling doaj-957571dbbf5a4429843275ec30d859372021-03-19T20:48:04ZdeuStudienVerlagÖsterreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften1016-765X2707-966X2007-08-0118310.25365/oezg-2007-18-3-6Eheliches Glück und Störungen der sexuellen Genussfähigkeit in Medizin und Psychoanalyse 1890–1920Christa Putz Disorders of sexual desire in couples appear in the wake of an ›eroticization‹ of the marital couple in the late 19th century. In the paper the formulation of new pathologies of sexual desire and satisfaction in german-speaking medicine and psychoanalysis is not understood as a self-referential process of »internal« discovery. Instead, the author tries to demonstrate that this scientific type of knowledge takes its contours mainly by relating itself to non-scientific discourses regulating and guiding marital sexual behaviour. The paper elaborates its various relations to marriage law and love literature. In demarcation to marriage law, doctors advocated marital sex as an experience of pleasure and satisfaction, extending the pathological far beyond the legal criteria of conjugal duty and physical capability. Independent from the legal regulation of divorce, they established a therapeutic field for treating marital dissatisfaction. The transfer of the notion of romantic love from literature authorised this endeavour and helped to introduce psychology and feelings into the mere biological concept of sexuality. From the romantic model, doctors adapted norms like equality, reciprocity and emotional intensity. Against fate and incident in love and its tragic failure in marriage – all popular motives in literature – they set out the promise of therapeutic fabrication of marital sexual happiness. Only psychoanalysts remain sceptical about the malleability of sex and the general suitability of marriage for sexual satisfaction. https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/oezg/article/view/3964
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christa Putz
spellingShingle Christa Putz
Eheliches Glück und Störungen der sexuellen Genussfähigkeit in Medizin und Psychoanalyse 1890–1920
Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften
author_facet Christa Putz
author_sort Christa Putz
title Eheliches Glück und Störungen der sexuellen Genussfähigkeit in Medizin und Psychoanalyse 1890–1920
title_short Eheliches Glück und Störungen der sexuellen Genussfähigkeit in Medizin und Psychoanalyse 1890–1920
title_full Eheliches Glück und Störungen der sexuellen Genussfähigkeit in Medizin und Psychoanalyse 1890–1920
title_fullStr Eheliches Glück und Störungen der sexuellen Genussfähigkeit in Medizin und Psychoanalyse 1890–1920
title_full_unstemmed Eheliches Glück und Störungen der sexuellen Genussfähigkeit in Medizin und Psychoanalyse 1890–1920
title_sort eheliches glück und störungen der sexuellen genussfähigkeit in medizin und psychoanalyse 1890–1920
publisher StudienVerlag
series Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften
issn 1016-765X
2707-966X
publishDate 2007-08-01
description Disorders of sexual desire in couples appear in the wake of an ›eroticization‹ of the marital couple in the late 19th century. In the paper the formulation of new pathologies of sexual desire and satisfaction in german-speaking medicine and psychoanalysis is not understood as a self-referential process of »internal« discovery. Instead, the author tries to demonstrate that this scientific type of knowledge takes its contours mainly by relating itself to non-scientific discourses regulating and guiding marital sexual behaviour. The paper elaborates its various relations to marriage law and love literature. In demarcation to marriage law, doctors advocated marital sex as an experience of pleasure and satisfaction, extending the pathological far beyond the legal criteria of conjugal duty and physical capability. Independent from the legal regulation of divorce, they established a therapeutic field for treating marital dissatisfaction. The transfer of the notion of romantic love from literature authorised this endeavour and helped to introduce psychology and feelings into the mere biological concept of sexuality. From the romantic model, doctors adapted norms like equality, reciprocity and emotional intensity. Against fate and incident in love and its tragic failure in marriage – all popular motives in literature – they set out the promise of therapeutic fabrication of marital sexual happiness. Only psychoanalysts remain sceptical about the malleability of sex and the general suitability of marriage for sexual satisfaction.
url https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/oezg/article/view/3964
work_keys_str_mv AT christaputz ehelichesgluckundstorungendersexuellengenussfahigkeitinmedizinundpsychoanalyse18901920
_version_ 1724212688967434240