S-Detect Software vs. EU-TIRADS Classification: A Dual-Center Validation of Diagnostic Performance in Differentiation of Thyroid Nodules
Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) and other risk stratification systems may improve ultrasound image interpretation. This prospective study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of CAD and the European Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (EU-TIRADS) classification applied by physicians with...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-08-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/8/2495 |
id |
doaj-9566150cd1f04439b2ac7e9a68b58605 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ewelina Szczepanek-Parulska Kosma Wolinski Katarzyna Dobruch-Sobczak Patrycja Antosik Anna Ostalowska Agnieszka Krauze Bartosz Migda Agnieszka Zylka Malgorzata Lange-Ratajczak Tomasz Banasiewicz Marek Dedecjus Zbigniew Adamczewski Rafal Z. Slapa Robert K. Mlosek Andrzej Lewinski Marek Ruchala |
spellingShingle |
Ewelina Szczepanek-Parulska Kosma Wolinski Katarzyna Dobruch-Sobczak Patrycja Antosik Anna Ostalowska Agnieszka Krauze Bartosz Migda Agnieszka Zylka Malgorzata Lange-Ratajczak Tomasz Banasiewicz Marek Dedecjus Zbigniew Adamczewski Rafal Z. Slapa Robert K. Mlosek Andrzej Lewinski Marek Ruchala S-Detect Software vs. EU-TIRADS Classification: A Dual-Center Validation of Diagnostic Performance in Differentiation of Thyroid Nodules Journal of Clinical Medicine thyroid nodules thyroid cancer ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis S-Detect EU-TIRADS |
author_facet |
Ewelina Szczepanek-Parulska Kosma Wolinski Katarzyna Dobruch-Sobczak Patrycja Antosik Anna Ostalowska Agnieszka Krauze Bartosz Migda Agnieszka Zylka Malgorzata Lange-Ratajczak Tomasz Banasiewicz Marek Dedecjus Zbigniew Adamczewski Rafal Z. Slapa Robert K. Mlosek Andrzej Lewinski Marek Ruchala |
author_sort |
Ewelina Szczepanek-Parulska |
title |
S-Detect Software vs. EU-TIRADS Classification: A Dual-Center Validation of Diagnostic Performance in Differentiation of Thyroid Nodules |
title_short |
S-Detect Software vs. EU-TIRADS Classification: A Dual-Center Validation of Diagnostic Performance in Differentiation of Thyroid Nodules |
title_full |
S-Detect Software vs. EU-TIRADS Classification: A Dual-Center Validation of Diagnostic Performance in Differentiation of Thyroid Nodules |
title_fullStr |
S-Detect Software vs. EU-TIRADS Classification: A Dual-Center Validation of Diagnostic Performance in Differentiation of Thyroid Nodules |
title_full_unstemmed |
S-Detect Software vs. EU-TIRADS Classification: A Dual-Center Validation of Diagnostic Performance in Differentiation of Thyroid Nodules |
title_sort |
s-detect software vs. eu-tirads classification: a dual-center validation of diagnostic performance in differentiation of thyroid nodules |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Journal of Clinical Medicine |
issn |
2077-0383 |
publishDate |
2020-08-01 |
description |
Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) and other risk stratification systems may improve ultrasound image interpretation. This prospective study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of CAD and the European Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (EU-TIRADS) classification applied by physicians with S-Detect 2 software CAD based on Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) and combinations of both methods (MODELs 1 to 5). In all, 133 nodules from 88 patients referred to thyroidectomy with available histopathology or with unambiguous results of cytology were included. The S-Detect system, EU-TIRADS, and mixed MODELs 1–5 for the diagnosis of thyroid cancer showed a sensitivity of 89.4%, 90.9%, 84.9%, 95.5%, 93.9%, 78.9% and 93.9%; a specificity of 80.6%, 61.2%, 88.1%, 53.7%, 73.1%, 89.6% and 80.6%; a positive predictive value of 81.9%, 69.8%, 87.5%, 67%, 77.5%, 88.1% and 82.7%; a negative predictive value of 88.5%, 87.2%, 85.5%, 92.3%, 92.5%, 81.1% and 93.1%; and an accuracy of 85%, 75.9%, 86.5%, 74.4%, 83.5%, 84.2%, and 87.2%, respectively. Comparison showed superiority of the similar MODELs 1 and 5 over other mixed models as well as EU-TIRADS and S-Detect used alone (<i>p</i>-value < 0.05). S-Detect software is characterized with high sensitivity and good specificity, whereas EU-TIRADS has high sensitivity, but rather low specificity. The best diagnostic performance in malignant thyroid nodule (TN) risk stratification was obtained for the combined model of S-Detect (“possibly malignant” nodule) and simultaneously obtaining 4 or 5 points (MODEL 1) or exactly 5 points (MODEL 5) on the EU-TIRADS scale. |
topic |
thyroid nodules thyroid cancer ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis S-Detect EU-TIRADS |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/8/2495 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ewelinaszczepanekparulska sdetectsoftwarevseutiradsclassificationadualcentervalidationofdiagnosticperformanceindifferentiationofthyroidnodules AT kosmawolinski sdetectsoftwarevseutiradsclassificationadualcentervalidationofdiagnosticperformanceindifferentiationofthyroidnodules AT katarzynadobruchsobczak sdetectsoftwarevseutiradsclassificationadualcentervalidationofdiagnosticperformanceindifferentiationofthyroidnodules AT patrycjaantosik sdetectsoftwarevseutiradsclassificationadualcentervalidationofdiagnosticperformanceindifferentiationofthyroidnodules AT annaostalowska sdetectsoftwarevseutiradsclassificationadualcentervalidationofdiagnosticperformanceindifferentiationofthyroidnodules AT agnieszkakrauze sdetectsoftwarevseutiradsclassificationadualcentervalidationofdiagnosticperformanceindifferentiationofthyroidnodules AT bartoszmigda sdetectsoftwarevseutiradsclassificationadualcentervalidationofdiagnosticperformanceindifferentiationofthyroidnodules AT agnieszkazylka sdetectsoftwarevseutiradsclassificationadualcentervalidationofdiagnosticperformanceindifferentiationofthyroidnodules AT malgorzatalangeratajczak sdetectsoftwarevseutiradsclassificationadualcentervalidationofdiagnosticperformanceindifferentiationofthyroidnodules AT tomaszbanasiewicz sdetectsoftwarevseutiradsclassificationadualcentervalidationofdiagnosticperformanceindifferentiationofthyroidnodules AT marekdedecjus sdetectsoftwarevseutiradsclassificationadualcentervalidationofdiagnosticperformanceindifferentiationofthyroidnodules AT zbigniewadamczewski sdetectsoftwarevseutiradsclassificationadualcentervalidationofdiagnosticperformanceindifferentiationofthyroidnodules AT rafalzslapa sdetectsoftwarevseutiradsclassificationadualcentervalidationofdiagnosticperformanceindifferentiationofthyroidnodules AT robertkmlosek sdetectsoftwarevseutiradsclassificationadualcentervalidationofdiagnosticperformanceindifferentiationofthyroidnodules AT andrzejlewinski sdetectsoftwarevseutiradsclassificationadualcentervalidationofdiagnosticperformanceindifferentiationofthyroidnodules AT marekruchala sdetectsoftwarevseutiradsclassificationadualcentervalidationofdiagnosticperformanceindifferentiationofthyroidnodules |
_version_ |
1724792510983700480 |
spelling |
doaj-9566150cd1f04439b2ac7e9a68b586052020-11-25T02:38:08ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832020-08-0192495249510.3390/jcm9082495S-Detect Software vs. EU-TIRADS Classification: A Dual-Center Validation of Diagnostic Performance in Differentiation of Thyroid NodulesEwelina Szczepanek-Parulska0Kosma Wolinski1Katarzyna Dobruch-Sobczak2Patrycja Antosik3Anna Ostalowska4Agnieszka Krauze5Bartosz Migda6Agnieszka Zylka7Malgorzata Lange-Ratajczak8Tomasz Banasiewicz9Marek Dedecjus10Zbigniew Adamczewski11Rafal Z. Slapa12Robert K. Mlosek13Andrzej Lewinski14Marek Ruchala15Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-355 Poznan, PolandDepartment of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-355 Poznan, PolandRadiology Department II, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-355 Poznan, PolandDepartment of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-355 Poznan, PolandDiagnostic Imaging Department, Medical University of Warsaw, 2nd Faculty of Medicine with the English Division and the Physiotherapy Division, 03-242 Warsaw, PolandDiagnostic Imaging Department, Medical University of Warsaw, 2nd Faculty of Medicine with the English Division and the Physiotherapy Division, 03-242 Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Oncological Endocrinology and Nuclear Medicine, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, PolandDepartment of General, Endocrinological, and Oncological Surgery and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-355 Poznan, PolandDepartment of General, Endocrinological, and Oncological Surgery and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-355 Poznan, PolandDepartment of Oncological Endocrinology and Nuclear Medicine, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, PolandDiagnostic Imaging Department, Medical University of Warsaw, 2nd Faculty of Medicine with the English Division and the Physiotherapy Division, 03-242 Warsaw, PolandDiagnostic Imaging Department, Medical University of Warsaw, 2nd Faculty of Medicine with the English Division and the Physiotherapy Division, 03-242 Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, PolandDepartment of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-355 Poznan, PolandComputer-aided diagnosis (CAD) and other risk stratification systems may improve ultrasound image interpretation. This prospective study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of CAD and the European Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (EU-TIRADS) classification applied by physicians with S-Detect 2 software CAD based on Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) and combinations of both methods (MODELs 1 to 5). In all, 133 nodules from 88 patients referred to thyroidectomy with available histopathology or with unambiguous results of cytology were included. The S-Detect system, EU-TIRADS, and mixed MODELs 1–5 for the diagnosis of thyroid cancer showed a sensitivity of 89.4%, 90.9%, 84.9%, 95.5%, 93.9%, 78.9% and 93.9%; a specificity of 80.6%, 61.2%, 88.1%, 53.7%, 73.1%, 89.6% and 80.6%; a positive predictive value of 81.9%, 69.8%, 87.5%, 67%, 77.5%, 88.1% and 82.7%; a negative predictive value of 88.5%, 87.2%, 85.5%, 92.3%, 92.5%, 81.1% and 93.1%; and an accuracy of 85%, 75.9%, 86.5%, 74.4%, 83.5%, 84.2%, and 87.2%, respectively. Comparison showed superiority of the similar MODELs 1 and 5 over other mixed models as well as EU-TIRADS and S-Detect used alone (<i>p</i>-value < 0.05). S-Detect software is characterized with high sensitivity and good specificity, whereas EU-TIRADS has high sensitivity, but rather low specificity. The best diagnostic performance in malignant thyroid nodule (TN) risk stratification was obtained for the combined model of S-Detect (“possibly malignant” nodule) and simultaneously obtaining 4 or 5 points (MODEL 1) or exactly 5 points (MODEL 5) on the EU-TIRADS scale.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/8/2495thyroid nodulesthyroid cancerultrasoundcomputer-aided diagnosisS-DetectEU-TIRADS |