You Will Respect My Authoritah!? A Reply to Botting
In a paper (Mizrahi 2013a) and a reply to critics (Mizrahi 2016a) published in Informal Logic, I argue that arguments from expert opinion are weak arguments. To appeal to expert opinion is to take an expert’s judgment that p is the case as (defeasible) evidence for p. Such appeals to expert opinion...
Main Author: | Moti Mizrahi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Windsor
2019-03-01
|
Series: | Informal Logic |
Online Access: | https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/5719 |
Similar Items
-
Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are still Weak: A Reply to Seidel
by: Moti Mizrahi
Published: (2016-07-01) -
Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are still Weak: A Reply to Seidel
by: Moti Mizrahi
Published: (2016-07-01) -
Take My Advice—I Am Not Following It: Ad Hominem Arguments as Legitimate Rebuttals to Appeals to Authority
by: Moti Mizrahi
Published: (2010-12-01) -
The Epistemic Inferiority of Pragma-Dialectics – Reply to Botting
by: Christoph Lumer
Published: (2012-03-01) -
The Epistemic Inferiority of Pragma-Dialectics – Reply to Botting
by: Christoph Lumer
Published: (2012-03-01)