Can we depend on investigators to identify and register randomized controlled trials?
To reduce publication bias, systematic reviewers are advised to search conference abstracts to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in humans and not published in full. We assessed the information provided by authors to aid identification of RCTs for reviews.We handsearched the Ass...
Main Authors: | Roberta W Scherer, Pamela C Sieving, Ann-Margret Ervin, Kay Dickersin |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3439467?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
Using ClinicalTrials.gov to supplement information in ophthalmology conference abstracts about trial outcomes: a comparison study.
by: Roberta W Scherer, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Can we identify non-stationary dynamics of trial-to-trial variability?
by: Emili Balaguer-Ballester, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
National quality register of congenital heart diseases – Can we trust the data?
by: Amanda Bodell, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01) -
Can we involve adolescents in HIV vaccine trials - can we afford not to?
by: Linda-Gail Bekker
Published: (2005-05-01) -
Opinions on registering trial details: a survey of academic researchers
by: Trelle Sven, et al.
Published: (2008-01-01)