Measurement properties, feasibility and clinical utility of the Doloplus-2 pain scale in older adults with cognitive impairment: a systematic review

Abstract Background The Doloplus-2 is a pain assessment scale for assessing pain in older adults with cognitive impairment. It is used in clinical practice and research. However, evidence for its measurement properties, feasibility and clinical utility remain incomplete. This systematic review synth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hanne Marie Rostad, Inger Utne, Ellen Karine Grov, Martine Puts, Liv Halvorsrud
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-11-01
Series:BMC Geriatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12877-017-0643-9
id doaj-9548a70ac5434d64bf60c0dd0c1022b6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9548a70ac5434d64bf60c0dd0c1022b62020-11-25T03:58:24ZengBMCBMC Geriatrics1471-23182017-11-0117112810.1186/s12877-017-0643-9Measurement properties, feasibility and clinical utility of the Doloplus-2 pain scale in older adults with cognitive impairment: a systematic reviewHanne Marie Rostad0Inger Utne1Ellen Karine Grov2Martine Puts3Liv Halvorsrud4Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health SciencesDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health SciencesDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health SciencesLawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of TorontoDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health SciencesAbstract Background The Doloplus-2 is a pain assessment scale for assessing pain in older adults with cognitive impairment. It is used in clinical practice and research. However, evidence for its measurement properties, feasibility and clinical utility remain incomplete. This systematic review synthesizes previous research on the measurement properties, feasibility and clinical utility of the scale. Method We conducted a systematic search in three databases (CINAHL, Medline and PsycINFO) for studies published in English, French, German, Dutch/Flemish or a Scandinavian language between 1990 and April 2017. We also reviewed the Doloplus-2 homepage and reference lists of included studies to supplement our search. Two reviewers independently reviewed titles and abstracts and performed the quality assessment and data abstraction. Results A total of 24 studies were included in this systematic review. The quality of the studies varied, but many lacked sufficient detail about the samples and response rates. The Doloplus-2 has been studied using diverse samples in a variety of settings; most study participants were in long-term care and in people with dementia. Sixteen studies addressed various aspects of the scale’s feasibility and clinical utility, but their results are limited and inconsistent across settings and samples. Support for the scale’s reliability, validity and responsiveness varied widely across the studies. Generally, the reliability coefficients reached acceptable benchmarks, but the evidence for different aspects of the scale’s validity and responsiveness was incomplete. Conclusion Additional high-quality studies are warranted to determine in which populations of older adults with cognitive impairment the Doloplus-2 is reliable, valid and feasible. The ability of the Doloplus-2 to meaningfully quantify pain, measure treatment response and improve patient outcomes also needs further investigation. Trial registration PROSPERO reg. no.: CRD42016049697 registered 20. Oct. 2016.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12877-017-0643-9Cognitive impairmentDementiaDoloplus-2PainOlder adultsSystematic review
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hanne Marie Rostad
Inger Utne
Ellen Karine Grov
Martine Puts
Liv Halvorsrud
spellingShingle Hanne Marie Rostad
Inger Utne
Ellen Karine Grov
Martine Puts
Liv Halvorsrud
Measurement properties, feasibility and clinical utility of the Doloplus-2 pain scale in older adults with cognitive impairment: a systematic review
BMC Geriatrics
Cognitive impairment
Dementia
Doloplus-2
Pain
Older adults
Systematic review
author_facet Hanne Marie Rostad
Inger Utne
Ellen Karine Grov
Martine Puts
Liv Halvorsrud
author_sort Hanne Marie Rostad
title Measurement properties, feasibility and clinical utility of the Doloplus-2 pain scale in older adults with cognitive impairment: a systematic review
title_short Measurement properties, feasibility and clinical utility of the Doloplus-2 pain scale in older adults with cognitive impairment: a systematic review
title_full Measurement properties, feasibility and clinical utility of the Doloplus-2 pain scale in older adults with cognitive impairment: a systematic review
title_fullStr Measurement properties, feasibility and clinical utility of the Doloplus-2 pain scale in older adults with cognitive impairment: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Measurement properties, feasibility and clinical utility of the Doloplus-2 pain scale in older adults with cognitive impairment: a systematic review
title_sort measurement properties, feasibility and clinical utility of the doloplus-2 pain scale in older adults with cognitive impairment: a systematic review
publisher BMC
series BMC Geriatrics
issn 1471-2318
publishDate 2017-11-01
description Abstract Background The Doloplus-2 is a pain assessment scale for assessing pain in older adults with cognitive impairment. It is used in clinical practice and research. However, evidence for its measurement properties, feasibility and clinical utility remain incomplete. This systematic review synthesizes previous research on the measurement properties, feasibility and clinical utility of the scale. Method We conducted a systematic search in three databases (CINAHL, Medline and PsycINFO) for studies published in English, French, German, Dutch/Flemish or a Scandinavian language between 1990 and April 2017. We also reviewed the Doloplus-2 homepage and reference lists of included studies to supplement our search. Two reviewers independently reviewed titles and abstracts and performed the quality assessment and data abstraction. Results A total of 24 studies were included in this systematic review. The quality of the studies varied, but many lacked sufficient detail about the samples and response rates. The Doloplus-2 has been studied using diverse samples in a variety of settings; most study participants were in long-term care and in people with dementia. Sixteen studies addressed various aspects of the scale’s feasibility and clinical utility, but their results are limited and inconsistent across settings and samples. Support for the scale’s reliability, validity and responsiveness varied widely across the studies. Generally, the reliability coefficients reached acceptable benchmarks, but the evidence for different aspects of the scale’s validity and responsiveness was incomplete. Conclusion Additional high-quality studies are warranted to determine in which populations of older adults with cognitive impairment the Doloplus-2 is reliable, valid and feasible. The ability of the Doloplus-2 to meaningfully quantify pain, measure treatment response and improve patient outcomes also needs further investigation. Trial registration PROSPERO reg. no.: CRD42016049697 registered 20. Oct. 2016.
topic Cognitive impairment
Dementia
Doloplus-2
Pain
Older adults
Systematic review
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12877-017-0643-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hannemarierostad measurementpropertiesfeasibilityandclinicalutilityofthedoloplus2painscaleinolderadultswithcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
AT ingerutne measurementpropertiesfeasibilityandclinicalutilityofthedoloplus2painscaleinolderadultswithcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
AT ellenkarinegrov measurementpropertiesfeasibilityandclinicalutilityofthedoloplus2painscaleinolderadultswithcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
AT martineputs measurementpropertiesfeasibilityandclinicalutilityofthedoloplus2painscaleinolderadultswithcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
AT livhalvorsrud measurementpropertiesfeasibilityandclinicalutilityofthedoloplus2painscaleinolderadultswithcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
_version_ 1724457389941325824