Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies.
BACKGROUND: While more and more open procedures now routinely performed using laparoscopy, minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) remains one of the most challenging abdominal procedures. Therefore, we carried out this meta-analysis to evaluate whether MIPD is safe, feasible and worthwhil...
Main Authors: | Han Qin, Jianguo Qiu, Yiyang Zhao, Gang Pan, Yong Zeng |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4132100?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
A systemic review and an updated meta-analysis: minimally invasive vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy
by: Zhanwei Zhao, et al.
Published: (2017-05-01) -
Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery
by: Ke Chen, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01) -
Minimally invasive versus open radical resection surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Comparable outcomes associated with advantages of minimal invasiveness.
by: Wei Tang, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Short-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: a propensity score-matched analysis
by: Shih-Min Yin, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Comparison of overall survival and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Yu-Li Jiang, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01)