Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies.
BACKGROUND: While more and more open procedures now routinely performed using laparoscopy, minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) remains one of the most challenging abdominal procedures. Therefore, we carried out this meta-analysis to evaluate whether MIPD is safe, feasible and worthwhil...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4132100?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-95431c0d2ecd47f7a60bc66289e3e66a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-95431c0d2ecd47f7a60bc66289e3e66a2020-11-25T01:27:32ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0198e10427410.1371/journal.pone.0104274Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies.Han QinJianguo QiuYiyang ZhaoGang PanYong ZengBACKGROUND: While more and more open procedures now routinely performed using laparoscopy, minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) remains one of the most challenging abdominal procedures. Therefore, we carried out this meta-analysis to evaluate whether MIPD is safe, feasible and worthwhile. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify studies published between January 1994 and November 2013 comparing MIPD with open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). Intraoperative outcomes, oncologic safety, postoperative complications, and postoperative recovery were evaluated. RESULTS: 11 retrospective studies representing 869 patients (327 MIPDs, 542 OPDs) were included. MIPD was associated with a reduction in estimated blood loss (MD -361.93 ml, 95% CI -519.22 to -204.63 ml, p<0.001, I(2) = 94%), wound infection (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.78, p = 0.007, I(2) = 0%), and hospital stay (MD -2.64 d, 95% CI -4.23 to -1.05 d, p = 0.001, I(2) = 78%). However, it brings longer operative time (MD 105 min, 95% CI 49.73 to 160.26 min, p<0.001, I(2) = 93%). There were no significant differences between the two procedures in likelihood of overall complications (p = 0.05), pancreatic fistula (PF) (p = 0.86), delayed gastric empting (DGE) (p = 0.96), positive surgical margins (p = 0.07), retrieval of lymph nodes (p = 0.48), reoperation (p = 0.16) and mortality (p = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that MIPD is currently safe, feasible and worthwhile. But considering the selection bias, complexity of MIPD and lack of long-term oncologic outcomes, we suggest it be performed in a high-volume pancreatic surgery center in selected patients.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4132100?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Han Qin Jianguo Qiu Yiyang Zhao Gang Pan Yong Zeng |
spellingShingle |
Han Qin Jianguo Qiu Yiyang Zhao Gang Pan Yong Zeng Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Han Qin Jianguo Qiu Yiyang Zhao Gang Pan Yong Zeng |
author_sort |
Han Qin |
title |
Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies. |
title_short |
Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies. |
title_full |
Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies. |
title_fullStr |
Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies. |
title_sort |
does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? a meta-analysis of retrospective studies. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
BACKGROUND: While more and more open procedures now routinely performed using laparoscopy, minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) remains one of the most challenging abdominal procedures. Therefore, we carried out this meta-analysis to evaluate whether MIPD is safe, feasible and worthwhile. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify studies published between January 1994 and November 2013 comparing MIPD with open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). Intraoperative outcomes, oncologic safety, postoperative complications, and postoperative recovery were evaluated. RESULTS: 11 retrospective studies representing 869 patients (327 MIPDs, 542 OPDs) were included. MIPD was associated with a reduction in estimated blood loss (MD -361.93 ml, 95% CI -519.22 to -204.63 ml, p<0.001, I(2) = 94%), wound infection (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.78, p = 0.007, I(2) = 0%), and hospital stay (MD -2.64 d, 95% CI -4.23 to -1.05 d, p = 0.001, I(2) = 78%). However, it brings longer operative time (MD 105 min, 95% CI 49.73 to 160.26 min, p<0.001, I(2) = 93%). There were no significant differences between the two procedures in likelihood of overall complications (p = 0.05), pancreatic fistula (PF) (p = 0.86), delayed gastric empting (DGE) (p = 0.96), positive surgical margins (p = 0.07), retrieval of lymph nodes (p = 0.48), reoperation (p = 0.16) and mortality (p = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that MIPD is currently safe, feasible and worthwhile. But considering the selection bias, complexity of MIPD and lack of long-term oncologic outcomes, we suggest it be performed in a high-volume pancreatic surgery center in selected patients. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4132100?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hanqin doesminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyhaveadvantagesoveritsopenmethodametaanalysisofretrospectivestudies AT jianguoqiu doesminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyhaveadvantagesoveritsopenmethodametaanalysisofretrospectivestudies AT yiyangzhao doesminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyhaveadvantagesoveritsopenmethodametaanalysisofretrospectivestudies AT gangpan doesminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyhaveadvantagesoveritsopenmethodametaanalysisofretrospectivestudies AT yongzeng doesminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyhaveadvantagesoveritsopenmethodametaanalysisofretrospectivestudies |
_version_ |
1725104868536877056 |