Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies.

BACKGROUND: While more and more open procedures now routinely performed using laparoscopy, minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) remains one of the most challenging abdominal procedures. Therefore, we carried out this meta-analysis to evaluate whether MIPD is safe, feasible and worthwhil...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Han Qin, Jianguo Qiu, Yiyang Zhao, Gang Pan, Yong Zeng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4132100?pdf=render
id doaj-95431c0d2ecd47f7a60bc66289e3e66a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-95431c0d2ecd47f7a60bc66289e3e66a2020-11-25T01:27:32ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0198e10427410.1371/journal.pone.0104274Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies.Han QinJianguo QiuYiyang ZhaoGang PanYong ZengBACKGROUND: While more and more open procedures now routinely performed using laparoscopy, minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) remains one of the most challenging abdominal procedures. Therefore, we carried out this meta-analysis to evaluate whether MIPD is safe, feasible and worthwhile. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify studies published between January 1994 and November 2013 comparing MIPD with open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). Intraoperative outcomes, oncologic safety, postoperative complications, and postoperative recovery were evaluated. RESULTS: 11 retrospective studies representing 869 patients (327 MIPDs, 542 OPDs) were included. MIPD was associated with a reduction in estimated blood loss (MD -361.93 ml, 95% CI -519.22 to -204.63 ml, p<0.001, I(2) = 94%), wound infection (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.78, p = 0.007, I(2) = 0%), and hospital stay (MD -2.64 d, 95% CI -4.23 to -1.05 d, p = 0.001, I(2) = 78%). However, it brings longer operative time (MD 105 min, 95% CI 49.73 to 160.26 min, p<0.001, I(2) = 93%). There were no significant differences between the two procedures in likelihood of overall complications (p = 0.05), pancreatic fistula (PF) (p = 0.86), delayed gastric empting (DGE) (p = 0.96), positive surgical margins (p = 0.07), retrieval of lymph nodes (p = 0.48), reoperation (p = 0.16) and mortality (p = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that MIPD is currently safe, feasible and worthwhile. But considering the selection bias, complexity of MIPD and lack of long-term oncologic outcomes, we suggest it be performed in a high-volume pancreatic surgery center in selected patients.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4132100?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Han Qin
Jianguo Qiu
Yiyang Zhao
Gang Pan
Yong Zeng
spellingShingle Han Qin
Jianguo Qiu
Yiyang Zhao
Gang Pan
Yong Zeng
Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Han Qin
Jianguo Qiu
Yiyang Zhao
Gang Pan
Yong Zeng
author_sort Han Qin
title Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies.
title_short Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies.
title_full Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies.
title_fullStr Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies.
title_full_unstemmed Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies.
title_sort does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? a meta-analysis of retrospective studies.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description BACKGROUND: While more and more open procedures now routinely performed using laparoscopy, minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) remains one of the most challenging abdominal procedures. Therefore, we carried out this meta-analysis to evaluate whether MIPD is safe, feasible and worthwhile. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify studies published between January 1994 and November 2013 comparing MIPD with open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). Intraoperative outcomes, oncologic safety, postoperative complications, and postoperative recovery were evaluated. RESULTS: 11 retrospective studies representing 869 patients (327 MIPDs, 542 OPDs) were included. MIPD was associated with a reduction in estimated blood loss (MD -361.93 ml, 95% CI -519.22 to -204.63 ml, p<0.001, I(2) = 94%), wound infection (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.78, p = 0.007, I(2) = 0%), and hospital stay (MD -2.64 d, 95% CI -4.23 to -1.05 d, p = 0.001, I(2) = 78%). However, it brings longer operative time (MD 105 min, 95% CI 49.73 to 160.26 min, p<0.001, I(2) = 93%). There were no significant differences between the two procedures in likelihood of overall complications (p = 0.05), pancreatic fistula (PF) (p = 0.86), delayed gastric empting (DGE) (p = 0.96), positive surgical margins (p = 0.07), retrieval of lymph nodes (p = 0.48), reoperation (p = 0.16) and mortality (p = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that MIPD is currently safe, feasible and worthwhile. But considering the selection bias, complexity of MIPD and lack of long-term oncologic outcomes, we suggest it be performed in a high-volume pancreatic surgery center in selected patients.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4132100?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT hanqin doesminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyhaveadvantagesoveritsopenmethodametaanalysisofretrospectivestudies
AT jianguoqiu doesminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyhaveadvantagesoveritsopenmethodametaanalysisofretrospectivestudies
AT yiyangzhao doesminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyhaveadvantagesoveritsopenmethodametaanalysisofretrospectivestudies
AT gangpan doesminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyhaveadvantagesoveritsopenmethodametaanalysisofretrospectivestudies
AT yongzeng doesminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyhaveadvantagesoveritsopenmethodametaanalysisofretrospectivestudies
_version_ 1725104868536877056