Big Data Industrial Agglomeration Promoting Regional Innovation: Comparison between Guangzhou and Zhaoqing in China

This paper selects the data of big data industry in China’s “Guangzhou Development Zone Big Data Industrial Park” and “Zhaoqing Big Data Cloud Service Industrial Park” from 2014 to 2018, uses the improved knowledge production function to establish an OLS model, and compares the impact of MAR and Jac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhou Yuliang, Li Jinfeng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2020-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/74/e3sconf_ebldm2020_02054.pdf
id doaj-95398a8c71fa4e73959635caf6df0021
record_format Article
spelling doaj-95398a8c71fa4e73959635caf6df00212021-04-02T16:33:02ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422020-01-012140205410.1051/e3sconf/202021402054e3sconf_ebldm2020_02054Big Data Industrial Agglomeration Promoting Regional Innovation: Comparison between Guangzhou and Zhaoqing in ChinaZhou Yuliang0Li Jinfeng1School of Finance, Guangdong University of Finance & EconomicsSchool of Liberal Arts, Zhaoqing UniversityThis paper selects the data of big data industry in China’s “Guangzhou Development Zone Big Data Industrial Park” and “Zhaoqing Big Data Cloud Service Industrial Park” from 2014 to 2018, uses the improved knowledge production function to establish an OLS model, and compares the impact of MAR and Jacobs external aggregation on the R&D input and patent output in Guangzhou and Zhaoqing. It is found that: (1) MAR externality is not conducive to the technological innovation of the two cities, and has a stronger negative effect on innovation in Zhaoqing; Jacobs externality can actively promote the innovation of the two cities, and has a stronger positive effect on innovation in Guangzhou. (2) In the impact of Jacobs externality on innovation output of the two cities, R&D plays a part of intermediary effect, and the effect on Guangzhou is stronger; in the impact of MAR externality on innovation output of the two cities, R&D only plays a part of negative intermediary effect in Zhaoqing. The conclusions show that the MAR and Jacobs agglomeration in big data industry all play more effective roles in promoting technological innovation in economically developed cities.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/74/e3sconf_ebldm2020_02054.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zhou Yuliang
Li Jinfeng
spellingShingle Zhou Yuliang
Li Jinfeng
Big Data Industrial Agglomeration Promoting Regional Innovation: Comparison between Guangzhou and Zhaoqing in China
E3S Web of Conferences
author_facet Zhou Yuliang
Li Jinfeng
author_sort Zhou Yuliang
title Big Data Industrial Agglomeration Promoting Regional Innovation: Comparison between Guangzhou and Zhaoqing in China
title_short Big Data Industrial Agglomeration Promoting Regional Innovation: Comparison between Guangzhou and Zhaoqing in China
title_full Big Data Industrial Agglomeration Promoting Regional Innovation: Comparison between Guangzhou and Zhaoqing in China
title_fullStr Big Data Industrial Agglomeration Promoting Regional Innovation: Comparison between Guangzhou and Zhaoqing in China
title_full_unstemmed Big Data Industrial Agglomeration Promoting Regional Innovation: Comparison between Guangzhou and Zhaoqing in China
title_sort big data industrial agglomeration promoting regional innovation: comparison between guangzhou and zhaoqing in china
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2020-01-01
description This paper selects the data of big data industry in China’s “Guangzhou Development Zone Big Data Industrial Park” and “Zhaoqing Big Data Cloud Service Industrial Park” from 2014 to 2018, uses the improved knowledge production function to establish an OLS model, and compares the impact of MAR and Jacobs external aggregation on the R&D input and patent output in Guangzhou and Zhaoqing. It is found that: (1) MAR externality is not conducive to the technological innovation of the two cities, and has a stronger negative effect on innovation in Zhaoqing; Jacobs externality can actively promote the innovation of the two cities, and has a stronger positive effect on innovation in Guangzhou. (2) In the impact of Jacobs externality on innovation output of the two cities, R&D plays a part of intermediary effect, and the effect on Guangzhou is stronger; in the impact of MAR externality on innovation output of the two cities, R&D only plays a part of negative intermediary effect in Zhaoqing. The conclusions show that the MAR and Jacobs agglomeration in big data industry all play more effective roles in promoting technological innovation in economically developed cities.
url https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/74/e3sconf_ebldm2020_02054.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouyuliang bigdataindustrialagglomerationpromotingregionalinnovationcomparisonbetweenguangzhouandzhaoqinginchina
AT lijinfeng bigdataindustrialagglomerationpromotingregionalinnovationcomparisonbetweenguangzhouandzhaoqinginchina
_version_ 1721556298804232192