Reassessing the "Impossible": A Critical Commentary on Reber and Alcock's "Why Parapsychological Claims Cannot Be True"
A critical commentary is offered on a skeptical rebuttal made by Arthur Reber and James Alcock in the July/August 2019 issue of Skeptical Inquirer, which came in response to an article by Etzel Cardeña (published in the mainstream journal American Psychologist in 2018) that reviewed the extensive ev...
Main Author: | Bryan J Williams |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SSE
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Scientific Exploration |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/1667 |
Similar Items
-
"The Data Are Irrelevant”: Comment on Reber and Alcock (2019)
by: Etzel Cardeña
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Should We Accept Arguments from Skeptics to Ignore the Psi Data? A Comment on Reber and Alcock’s Searching for the Impossible
by: George Robert Williams III
Published: (2019-12-01) -
A CALL FOR AN OPEN, INFORMED STUDY OF ALL ASPECTS OF CONSCIOUSNESS
by: Etzel eCardeña
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Researching unexplained phenomena: empirical-statistical validity and reliability of the Multivariable Multiaxial Suggestibility Inventory-2 (MMSI-2)
by: Álex Escolà-Gascón
Published: (2020-07-01) -
From text to self : the interplay of criticism and response in the history of parapsychology
by: Zingrone, Nancy L.
Published: (2006)