Fermentation of Ammonia Fiber Expansion Treated and Untreated Barley Straw in a Rumen Simulation Technique using Rumen Inoculum from Cattle with Slow Versus Fast Rate of Fiber Disappearance

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of rumen inoculum from heifers with fast vs. slow rate of in situ fiber digestion on the fermentation of complex versus easily digested fiber sources in the forms of untreated and Ammonia Fiber Expansion (AFEX) treated barley straw, respectively,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karen Ann Beauchemin, Candace L Griffith, Gabriel O Ribeiro, Masahito Oba, Tim A McAllister
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01839/full
id doaj-951bba13c9804d7eaa01f06f0845147d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-951bba13c9804d7eaa01f06f0845147d2020-11-24T23:58:52ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2016-11-01710.3389/fmicb.2016.01839229666Fermentation of Ammonia Fiber Expansion Treated and Untreated Barley Straw in a Rumen Simulation Technique using Rumen Inoculum from Cattle with Slow Versus Fast Rate of Fiber DisappearanceKaren Ann Beauchemin0Candace L Griffith1Candace L Griffith2Gabriel O Ribeiro3Gabriel O Ribeiro4Masahito Oba5Tim A McAllister6Agriculture and Agri-Food CanadaAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of AlbertaAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaCAPES FoundationUniversity of AlbertaAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaThe purpose of this study was to determine the effect of rumen inoculum from heifers with fast vs. slow rate of in situ fiber digestion on the fermentation of complex versus easily digested fiber sources in the forms of untreated and Ammonia Fiber Expansion (AFEX) treated barley straw, respectively, using an artificial rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). In situ fiber digestion was measured in a previous study by incubating untreated barley straw in the rumen of sixteen heifers fed a diet consisting of 700 g/kg barley straw and 300 g/kg concentrate. The two heifers with fastest rate of digestion (Fast > 4.18 % h-1) and the two heifers with the slowest rate of digestion (Slow < 3.17 % h-1) were chosen as inoculum donors for this study.Two Rusitec apparatuses each equipped with 8 fermenters were used in a completely randomized block design with 2 blocks (apparatus) and 4 treatments in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments (Fast or Slow rumen inoculum and untreated or AFEX treated straw). Fast rumen inoculum and AFEX straw both increased (P < 0.05) disappearance of dry matter (DMD), organic matter (OMD), true DMD (TDMD), neutral detergent fiber (NDFD), acid detergent fiber (ADFD) and nitrogen (N) with an interactive effect between the two (P < 0.05). Fast rumen inoculum increased (P > 0.05) methane per gram of digested material for both untreated and AFEX straw, and reduced (interaction, P < 0.05) acetate: propionate ratio for untreated straw. Greater relative populations of Ruminococcus albus (P < 0.05) and increased microbial N production (P = 0.045) were observed in Fast rumen inoculum. AFEX straw in Fast inoculum had greater total bacterial populations than Slow, but for untreated straw this result was reversed (interaction, P = 0.013). These findings indicate that differences in microbial populations in rumen fluid contribute to differences in the capacity of rumen inoculum to digest fiber.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01839/fullmicrobiomeReal-Time PCRstrawpre-treatmentAmmoniationFiber digestion
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karen Ann Beauchemin
Candace L Griffith
Candace L Griffith
Gabriel O Ribeiro
Gabriel O Ribeiro
Masahito Oba
Tim A McAllister
spellingShingle Karen Ann Beauchemin
Candace L Griffith
Candace L Griffith
Gabriel O Ribeiro
Gabriel O Ribeiro
Masahito Oba
Tim A McAllister
Fermentation of Ammonia Fiber Expansion Treated and Untreated Barley Straw in a Rumen Simulation Technique using Rumen Inoculum from Cattle with Slow Versus Fast Rate of Fiber Disappearance
Frontiers in Microbiology
microbiome
Real-Time PCR
straw
pre-treatment
Ammoniation
Fiber digestion
author_facet Karen Ann Beauchemin
Candace L Griffith
Candace L Griffith
Gabriel O Ribeiro
Gabriel O Ribeiro
Masahito Oba
Tim A McAllister
author_sort Karen Ann Beauchemin
title Fermentation of Ammonia Fiber Expansion Treated and Untreated Barley Straw in a Rumen Simulation Technique using Rumen Inoculum from Cattle with Slow Versus Fast Rate of Fiber Disappearance
title_short Fermentation of Ammonia Fiber Expansion Treated and Untreated Barley Straw in a Rumen Simulation Technique using Rumen Inoculum from Cattle with Slow Versus Fast Rate of Fiber Disappearance
title_full Fermentation of Ammonia Fiber Expansion Treated and Untreated Barley Straw in a Rumen Simulation Technique using Rumen Inoculum from Cattle with Slow Versus Fast Rate of Fiber Disappearance
title_fullStr Fermentation of Ammonia Fiber Expansion Treated and Untreated Barley Straw in a Rumen Simulation Technique using Rumen Inoculum from Cattle with Slow Versus Fast Rate of Fiber Disappearance
title_full_unstemmed Fermentation of Ammonia Fiber Expansion Treated and Untreated Barley Straw in a Rumen Simulation Technique using Rumen Inoculum from Cattle with Slow Versus Fast Rate of Fiber Disappearance
title_sort fermentation of ammonia fiber expansion treated and untreated barley straw in a rumen simulation technique using rumen inoculum from cattle with slow versus fast rate of fiber disappearance
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Microbiology
issn 1664-302X
publishDate 2016-11-01
description The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of rumen inoculum from heifers with fast vs. slow rate of in situ fiber digestion on the fermentation of complex versus easily digested fiber sources in the forms of untreated and Ammonia Fiber Expansion (AFEX) treated barley straw, respectively, using an artificial rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). In situ fiber digestion was measured in a previous study by incubating untreated barley straw in the rumen of sixteen heifers fed a diet consisting of 700 g/kg barley straw and 300 g/kg concentrate. The two heifers with fastest rate of digestion (Fast > 4.18 % h-1) and the two heifers with the slowest rate of digestion (Slow < 3.17 % h-1) were chosen as inoculum donors for this study.Two Rusitec apparatuses each equipped with 8 fermenters were used in a completely randomized block design with 2 blocks (apparatus) and 4 treatments in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments (Fast or Slow rumen inoculum and untreated or AFEX treated straw). Fast rumen inoculum and AFEX straw both increased (P < 0.05) disappearance of dry matter (DMD), organic matter (OMD), true DMD (TDMD), neutral detergent fiber (NDFD), acid detergent fiber (ADFD) and nitrogen (N) with an interactive effect between the two (P < 0.05). Fast rumen inoculum increased (P > 0.05) methane per gram of digested material for both untreated and AFEX straw, and reduced (interaction, P < 0.05) acetate: propionate ratio for untreated straw. Greater relative populations of Ruminococcus albus (P < 0.05) and increased microbial N production (P = 0.045) were observed in Fast rumen inoculum. AFEX straw in Fast inoculum had greater total bacterial populations than Slow, but for untreated straw this result was reversed (interaction, P = 0.013). These findings indicate that differences in microbial populations in rumen fluid contribute to differences in the capacity of rumen inoculum to digest fiber.
topic microbiome
Real-Time PCR
straw
pre-treatment
Ammoniation
Fiber digestion
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01839/full
work_keys_str_mv AT karenannbeauchemin fermentationofammoniafiberexpansiontreatedanduntreatedbarleystrawinarumensimulationtechniqueusingrumeninoculumfromcattlewithslowversusfastrateoffiberdisappearance
AT candacelgriffith fermentationofammoniafiberexpansiontreatedanduntreatedbarleystrawinarumensimulationtechniqueusingrumeninoculumfromcattlewithslowversusfastrateoffiberdisappearance
AT candacelgriffith fermentationofammoniafiberexpansiontreatedanduntreatedbarleystrawinarumensimulationtechniqueusingrumeninoculumfromcattlewithslowversusfastrateoffiberdisappearance
AT gabrieloribeiro fermentationofammoniafiberexpansiontreatedanduntreatedbarleystrawinarumensimulationtechniqueusingrumeninoculumfromcattlewithslowversusfastrateoffiberdisappearance
AT gabrieloribeiro fermentationofammoniafiberexpansiontreatedanduntreatedbarleystrawinarumensimulationtechniqueusingrumeninoculumfromcattlewithslowversusfastrateoffiberdisappearance
AT masahitooba fermentationofammoniafiberexpansiontreatedanduntreatedbarleystrawinarumensimulationtechniqueusingrumeninoculumfromcattlewithslowversusfastrateoffiberdisappearance
AT timamcallister fermentationofammoniafiberexpansiontreatedanduntreatedbarleystrawinarumensimulationtechniqueusingrumeninoculumfromcattlewithslowversusfastrateoffiberdisappearance
_version_ 1725449274687225856