FDI THEORIES AND PRACTICE: THE CASE OF KOREA

Prior to the Asianfinancial crisis ofJuly, 1997, the Republic ofKorea was the second industrialized country in Asia and joined the OECD in 1996, at that time its latest policy was to encourage Korean firms to invest abroad, recognizingareducedroleofitspastsuccessfulexport-orientedstrategy. Thispaper...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Trevor Crick, Suk Kim, Jane Oh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: People & Global Business Association (P&GBA) 1998-03-01
Series:Global Business and Finance Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.gbfrjournal.org/pds/journal/thesis/20150625123426-TMLZF.pdf
id doaj-951672633d6e452387f812b283c6ce26
record_format Article
spelling doaj-951672633d6e452387f812b283c6ce262021-02-19T00:30:18ZengPeople & Global Business Association (P&GBA)Global Business and Finance Review 1088-69312384-16481998-03-01315762FDI THEORIES AND PRACTICE: THE CASE OF KOREATrevor Crick0Suk Kim1Jane Oh2University of Detroit MercyUniversity of Detroit MercyUniversity of Detroit MercyPrior to the Asianfinancial crisis ofJuly, 1997, the Republic ofKorea was the second industrialized country in Asia and joined the OECD in 1996, at that time its latest policy was to encourage Korean firms to invest abroad, recognizingareducedroleofitspastsuccessfulexport-orientedstrategy. Thispaperattemptstofindempiricallythe underlying motivesfor Korean FD! in the United States as well asfor U.S. FD! in Korea. Data were gatheredfrom a questionnaire survey of63 Koreans (firm-owners, business professors, and Consuls) and 192 international busi- ness executives of U.S. companies that have invested in Korea. The results ofthe study show that: a) Korea seems to be in the final stage o f the investment development cycle, b) Korean firms possess ownership-specific advantages in technology with respect to a number of key industries, c) they were motivated to exploit some location-specific advantages, and d) the pattern ofKorean outward investment may suggest the value ofDunnings eclectic approach. For U.S. FD! in Korea, the two top motivations were "penetration in a growing market" and "anticipation ofrela- tively higher profits." Lastly, to what extent the impact o f Korean FD! as well as foreign investment in Korea in the past is linked to the recent Korean financial crisis is a very interesting area for future research.http://www.gbfrjournal.org/pds/journal/thesis/20150625123426-TMLZF.pdffdi theories for developing countrymotives for korean fdimotives for u.s fdifdi theory and practice
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Trevor Crick
Suk Kim
Jane Oh
spellingShingle Trevor Crick
Suk Kim
Jane Oh
FDI THEORIES AND PRACTICE: THE CASE OF KOREA
Global Business and Finance Review
fdi theories for developing country
motives for korean fdi
motives for u.s fdi
fdi theory and practice
author_facet Trevor Crick
Suk Kim
Jane Oh
author_sort Trevor Crick
title FDI THEORIES AND PRACTICE: THE CASE OF KOREA
title_short FDI THEORIES AND PRACTICE: THE CASE OF KOREA
title_full FDI THEORIES AND PRACTICE: THE CASE OF KOREA
title_fullStr FDI THEORIES AND PRACTICE: THE CASE OF KOREA
title_full_unstemmed FDI THEORIES AND PRACTICE: THE CASE OF KOREA
title_sort fdi theories and practice: the case of korea
publisher People & Global Business Association (P&GBA)
series Global Business and Finance Review
issn 1088-6931
2384-1648
publishDate 1998-03-01
description Prior to the Asianfinancial crisis ofJuly, 1997, the Republic ofKorea was the second industrialized country in Asia and joined the OECD in 1996, at that time its latest policy was to encourage Korean firms to invest abroad, recognizingareducedroleofitspastsuccessfulexport-orientedstrategy. Thispaperattemptstofindempiricallythe underlying motivesfor Korean FD! in the United States as well asfor U.S. FD! in Korea. Data were gatheredfrom a questionnaire survey of63 Koreans (firm-owners, business professors, and Consuls) and 192 international busi- ness executives of U.S. companies that have invested in Korea. The results ofthe study show that: a) Korea seems to be in the final stage o f the investment development cycle, b) Korean firms possess ownership-specific advantages in technology with respect to a number of key industries, c) they were motivated to exploit some location-specific advantages, and d) the pattern ofKorean outward investment may suggest the value ofDunnings eclectic approach. For U.S. FD! in Korea, the two top motivations were "penetration in a growing market" and "anticipation ofrela- tively higher profits." Lastly, to what extent the impact o f Korean FD! as well as foreign investment in Korea in the past is linked to the recent Korean financial crisis is a very interesting area for future research.
topic fdi theories for developing country
motives for korean fdi
motives for u.s fdi
fdi theory and practice
url http://www.gbfrjournal.org/pds/journal/thesis/20150625123426-TMLZF.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT trevorcrick fditheoriesandpracticethecaseofkorea
AT sukkim fditheoriesandpracticethecaseofkorea
AT janeoh fditheoriesandpracticethecaseofkorea
_version_ 1724261870599143424