FDI THEORIES AND PRACTICE: THE CASE OF KOREA
Prior to the Asianfinancial crisis ofJuly, 1997, the Republic ofKorea was the second industrialized country in Asia and joined the OECD in 1996, at that time its latest policy was to encourage Korean firms to invest abroad, recognizingareducedroleofitspastsuccessfulexport-orientedstrategy. Thispaper...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
People & Global Business Association (P&GBA)
1998-03-01
|
Series: | Global Business and Finance Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.gbfrjournal.org/pds/journal/thesis/20150625123426-TMLZF.pdf |
id |
doaj-951672633d6e452387f812b283c6ce26 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-951672633d6e452387f812b283c6ce262021-02-19T00:30:18ZengPeople & Global Business Association (P&GBA)Global Business and Finance Review 1088-69312384-16481998-03-01315762FDI THEORIES AND PRACTICE: THE CASE OF KOREATrevor Crick0Suk Kim1Jane Oh2University of Detroit MercyUniversity of Detroit MercyUniversity of Detroit MercyPrior to the Asianfinancial crisis ofJuly, 1997, the Republic ofKorea was the second industrialized country in Asia and joined the OECD in 1996, at that time its latest policy was to encourage Korean firms to invest abroad, recognizingareducedroleofitspastsuccessfulexport-orientedstrategy. Thispaperattemptstofindempiricallythe underlying motivesfor Korean FD! in the United States as well asfor U.S. FD! in Korea. Data were gatheredfrom a questionnaire survey of63 Koreans (firm-owners, business professors, and Consuls) and 192 international busi- ness executives of U.S. companies that have invested in Korea. The results ofthe study show that: a) Korea seems to be in the final stage o f the investment development cycle, b) Korean firms possess ownership-specific advantages in technology with respect to a number of key industries, c) they were motivated to exploit some location-specific advantages, and d) the pattern ofKorean outward investment may suggest the value ofDunnings eclectic approach. For U.S. FD! in Korea, the two top motivations were "penetration in a growing market" and "anticipation ofrela- tively higher profits." Lastly, to what extent the impact o f Korean FD! as well as foreign investment in Korea in the past is linked to the recent Korean financial crisis is a very interesting area for future research.http://www.gbfrjournal.org/pds/journal/thesis/20150625123426-TMLZF.pdffdi theories for developing countrymotives for korean fdimotives for u.s fdifdi theory and practice |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Trevor Crick Suk Kim Jane Oh |
spellingShingle |
Trevor Crick Suk Kim Jane Oh FDI THEORIES AND PRACTICE: THE CASE OF KOREA Global Business and Finance Review fdi theories for developing country motives for korean fdi motives for u.s fdi fdi theory and practice |
author_facet |
Trevor Crick Suk Kim Jane Oh |
author_sort |
Trevor Crick |
title |
FDI THEORIES AND PRACTICE: THE CASE OF KOREA |
title_short |
FDI THEORIES AND PRACTICE: THE CASE OF KOREA |
title_full |
FDI THEORIES AND PRACTICE: THE CASE OF KOREA |
title_fullStr |
FDI THEORIES AND PRACTICE: THE CASE OF KOREA |
title_full_unstemmed |
FDI THEORIES AND PRACTICE: THE CASE OF KOREA |
title_sort |
fdi theories and practice: the case of korea |
publisher |
People & Global Business Association (P&GBA) |
series |
Global Business and Finance Review |
issn |
1088-6931 2384-1648 |
publishDate |
1998-03-01 |
description |
Prior to the Asianfinancial crisis ofJuly, 1997, the Republic ofKorea was the second industrialized country in Asia and joined the OECD in 1996, at that time its latest policy was to encourage Korean firms to invest abroad, recognizingareducedroleofitspastsuccessfulexport-orientedstrategy. Thispaperattemptstofindempiricallythe underlying motivesfor Korean FD! in the United States as well asfor U.S. FD! in Korea. Data were gatheredfrom a questionnaire survey of63 Koreans (firm-owners, business professors, and Consuls) and 192 international busi- ness executives of U.S. companies that have invested in Korea. The results ofthe study show that: a) Korea seems to be in the final stage o f the investment development cycle, b) Korean firms possess ownership-specific advantages in technology with respect to a number of key industries, c) they were motivated to exploit some location-specific advantages, and d) the pattern ofKorean outward investment may suggest the value ofDunnings eclectic approach. For U.S. FD! in Korea, the two top motivations were "penetration in a growing market" and "anticipation ofrela- tively higher profits." Lastly, to what extent the impact o f Korean FD! as well as foreign investment in Korea in the past is linked to the recent Korean financial crisis is a very interesting area for future research. |
topic |
fdi theories for developing country motives for korean fdi motives for u.s fdi fdi theory and practice |
url |
http://www.gbfrjournal.org/pds/journal/thesis/20150625123426-TMLZF.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT trevorcrick fditheoriesandpracticethecaseofkorea AT sukkim fditheoriesandpracticethecaseofkorea AT janeoh fditheoriesandpracticethecaseofkorea |
_version_ |
1724261870599143424 |