Use of Beach Shoes for Foot Protection during the Bangkok Flood of 2011

BACKGROUND: Foot injury was common as a result of the Bangkok flood of 2011. In the future, this type of injury should be prevented to lessen the burden during a disaster. Objectives: The study was performed to ascertain what type of footwear is appropriate for volunteer rescue workers during a floo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Saranatra Waikakul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2013-03-01
Series:Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
Online Access:http://www.morthoj.org/2013/v7n1/beach-shoes-for-foot-protection.pdf
id doaj-950e43b20f5644bb981fa67f3e3c0d16
record_format Article
spelling doaj-950e43b20f5644bb981fa67f3e3c0d162021-05-02T15:22:21ZengMalaysian Orthopaedic AssociationMalaysian Orthopaedic Journal1985-25332013-03-01718487http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1303.007Use of Beach Shoes for Foot Protection during the Bangkok Flood of 2011Saranatra Waikakul0FRCOSTBACKGROUND: Foot injury was common as a result of the Bangkok flood of 2011. In the future, this type of injury should be prevented to lessen the burden during a disaster. Objectives: The study was performed to ascertain what type of footwear is appropriate for volunteer rescue workers during a flood. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was carried out during the flood in November 2011 at Siriraj Hospital. There were 15 volunteers enrolled in the study. None of the volunteers had any foot deformity or injury before the study. Participants were divided into 3 groups of 5 volunteers: group A, the barefoot group; group B, the high top shoe group; and group C, the beach shoe group. All volunteers worked in the areas close to Siriraj Hospital and were followed up after 5 days of rescue work. Prevalence of foot and ankle injuries, satisfaction regarding work conditions and willingness to use the shoes were subjectively evaluated. Wearing of beach shoes during rescue was satisfactory during the early phase of the flood. RESULTS: The age range of volunteers was 20-28. In the group A, most volunteers were barely satisfied with conducting rescue work in water with bare feet, that bare feet were good for working on a wet surface and were ‘just satisfied’ to not satisfied that bare feet were good for work on dry surfaces. In group B, most of the volunteers had opinions similar to group A with the exception that they felt better while they were working on dry surfaces. In group C, most volunteers were significantly more satisfied under all three conditions. Foot injury occurred in 2 volunteers from group A. CONCLUSION: Beach shoes offer adequate foot protection during flood rescue.http://www.morthoj.org/2013/v7n1/beach-shoes-for-foot-protection.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Saranatra Waikakul
spellingShingle Saranatra Waikakul
Use of Beach Shoes for Foot Protection during the Bangkok Flood of 2011
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
author_facet Saranatra Waikakul
author_sort Saranatra Waikakul
title Use of Beach Shoes for Foot Protection during the Bangkok Flood of 2011
title_short Use of Beach Shoes for Foot Protection during the Bangkok Flood of 2011
title_full Use of Beach Shoes for Foot Protection during the Bangkok Flood of 2011
title_fullStr Use of Beach Shoes for Foot Protection during the Bangkok Flood of 2011
title_full_unstemmed Use of Beach Shoes for Foot Protection during the Bangkok Flood of 2011
title_sort use of beach shoes for foot protection during the bangkok flood of 2011
publisher Malaysian Orthopaedic Association
series Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
issn 1985-2533
publishDate 2013-03-01
description BACKGROUND: Foot injury was common as a result of the Bangkok flood of 2011. In the future, this type of injury should be prevented to lessen the burden during a disaster. Objectives: The study was performed to ascertain what type of footwear is appropriate for volunteer rescue workers during a flood. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was carried out during the flood in November 2011 at Siriraj Hospital. There were 15 volunteers enrolled in the study. None of the volunteers had any foot deformity or injury before the study. Participants were divided into 3 groups of 5 volunteers: group A, the barefoot group; group B, the high top shoe group; and group C, the beach shoe group. All volunteers worked in the areas close to Siriraj Hospital and were followed up after 5 days of rescue work. Prevalence of foot and ankle injuries, satisfaction regarding work conditions and willingness to use the shoes were subjectively evaluated. Wearing of beach shoes during rescue was satisfactory during the early phase of the flood. RESULTS: The age range of volunteers was 20-28. In the group A, most volunteers were barely satisfied with conducting rescue work in water with bare feet, that bare feet were good for working on a wet surface and were ‘just satisfied’ to not satisfied that bare feet were good for work on dry surfaces. In group B, most of the volunteers had opinions similar to group A with the exception that they felt better while they were working on dry surfaces. In group C, most volunteers were significantly more satisfied under all three conditions. Foot injury occurred in 2 volunteers from group A. CONCLUSION: Beach shoes offer adequate foot protection during flood rescue.
url http://www.morthoj.org/2013/v7n1/beach-shoes-for-foot-protection.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT saranatrawaikakul useofbeachshoesforfootprotectionduringthebangkokfloodof2011
_version_ 1721490327645192192