The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Ward rounds form an integral part of Internal Medicine teaching. This study aimed to determine the trainees' opinions regarding various aspects of their ward rounds, including how well they cover their learning needs, how they w...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2010-07-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Education |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/10/53 |
id |
doaj-95076a619ef3435e8e5bbf45a5abdc01 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-95076a619ef3435e8e5bbf45a5abdc012020-11-25T03:50:57ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202010-07-011015310.1186/1472-6920-10-53The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional studyRiaz MehmoodAli SyedMotiwala AfaqTariq MuhammadAwan SafiaAkhter Jaweed<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Ward rounds form an integral part of Internal Medicine teaching. This study aimed to determine the trainees' opinions regarding various aspects of their ward rounds, including how well they cover their learning needs, how they would like the rounds to be conducted, and differences of opinion between medical students and postgraduates.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A cross-sectional study was conducted on a total of 134 trainees in Internal Medicine, comprising medical students, interns, residents and fellows, who were asked to fill in a structured, self-designed questionnaire. Most of the responses required a rating on a scale of 1-5 (1 being highly unsatisfactory and 5 being highly satisfactory).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Teaching of clinical skills and bedside teaching received the lowest overall mean score (Mean ± SD 2.48 ± 1.02 and 2.49 ± 1.12 respectively). They were rated much lower by postgraduates as compared to students (p < 0.001). All respondents felt that management of patients was the aspect best covered by the current ward rounds (Mean ± SD 3.71 ± 0.72). For their desired ward rounds, management of patients received the highest score (Mean ± SD 4.64 ± 0.55), followed by bedside examinations (Mean ± SD 4.60 ± 0.61) and clinical skills teaching (Mean ± SD 4.50 ± 0.68). The postgraduates desired a lot more focus on communication skills, counselling and medical ethics as compared to students, whose primary focus was teaching of bedside examination and management. A majority of the respondents (87%) preferred bedside rounds over conference room rounds. Even though the duration of rounds was found to be adequate, a majority of the trainees (68%) felt there was a lack of individual attention during ward rounds.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This study highlights important areas where ward rounds need improvement in order to maximize their benefit to the learners. There is a need to modify the current state of ward rounds in order to address the needs and expectations of trainees.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/10/53 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Riaz Mehmood Ali Syed Motiwala Afaq Tariq Muhammad Awan Safia Akhter Jaweed |
spellingShingle |
Riaz Mehmood Ali Syed Motiwala Afaq Tariq Muhammad Awan Safia Akhter Jaweed The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study BMC Medical Education |
author_facet |
Riaz Mehmood Ali Syed Motiwala Afaq Tariq Muhammad Awan Safia Akhter Jaweed |
author_sort |
Riaz Mehmood |
title |
The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study |
title_short |
The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study |
title_full |
The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr |
The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed |
The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort |
learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Medical Education |
issn |
1472-6920 |
publishDate |
2010-07-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Ward rounds form an integral part of Internal Medicine teaching. This study aimed to determine the trainees' opinions regarding various aspects of their ward rounds, including how well they cover their learning needs, how they would like the rounds to be conducted, and differences of opinion between medical students and postgraduates.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A cross-sectional study was conducted on a total of 134 trainees in Internal Medicine, comprising medical students, interns, residents and fellows, who were asked to fill in a structured, self-designed questionnaire. Most of the responses required a rating on a scale of 1-5 (1 being highly unsatisfactory and 5 being highly satisfactory).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Teaching of clinical skills and bedside teaching received the lowest overall mean score (Mean ± SD 2.48 ± 1.02 and 2.49 ± 1.12 respectively). They were rated much lower by postgraduates as compared to students (p < 0.001). All respondents felt that management of patients was the aspect best covered by the current ward rounds (Mean ± SD 3.71 ± 0.72). For their desired ward rounds, management of patients received the highest score (Mean ± SD 4.64 ± 0.55), followed by bedside examinations (Mean ± SD 4.60 ± 0.61) and clinical skills teaching (Mean ± SD 4.50 ± 0.68). The postgraduates desired a lot more focus on communication skills, counselling and medical ethics as compared to students, whose primary focus was teaching of bedside examination and management. A majority of the respondents (87%) preferred bedside rounds over conference room rounds. Even though the duration of rounds was found to be adequate, a majority of the trainees (68%) felt there was a lack of individual attention during ward rounds.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This study highlights important areas where ward rounds need improvement in order to maximize their benefit to the learners. There is a need to modify the current state of ward rounds in order to address the needs and expectations of trainees.</p> |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/10/53 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT riazmehmood thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy AT alisyed thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy AT motiwalaafaq thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy AT tariqmuhammad thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy AT awansafia thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy AT akhterjaweed thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy AT riazmehmood learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy AT alisyed learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy AT motiwalaafaq learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy AT tariqmuhammad learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy AT awansafia learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy AT akhterjaweed learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy |
_version_ |
1724489664253919232 |