The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Ward rounds form an integral part of Internal Medicine teaching. This study aimed to determine the trainees' opinions regarding various aspects of their ward rounds, including how well they cover their learning needs, how they w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Riaz Mehmood, Ali Syed, Motiwala Afaq, Tariq Muhammad, Awan Safia, Akhter Jaweed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-07-01
Series:BMC Medical Education
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/10/53
id doaj-95076a619ef3435e8e5bbf45a5abdc01
record_format Article
spelling doaj-95076a619ef3435e8e5bbf45a5abdc012020-11-25T03:50:57ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202010-07-011015310.1186/1472-6920-10-53The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional studyRiaz MehmoodAli SyedMotiwala AfaqTariq MuhammadAwan SafiaAkhter Jaweed<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Ward rounds form an integral part of Internal Medicine teaching. This study aimed to determine the trainees' opinions regarding various aspects of their ward rounds, including how well they cover their learning needs, how they would like the rounds to be conducted, and differences of opinion between medical students and postgraduates.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A cross-sectional study was conducted on a total of 134 trainees in Internal Medicine, comprising medical students, interns, residents and fellows, who were asked to fill in a structured, self-designed questionnaire. Most of the responses required a rating on a scale of 1-5 (1 being highly unsatisfactory and 5 being highly satisfactory).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Teaching of clinical skills and bedside teaching received the lowest overall mean score (Mean ± SD 2.48 ± 1.02 and 2.49 ± 1.12 respectively). They were rated much lower by postgraduates as compared to students (p < 0.001). All respondents felt that management of patients was the aspect best covered by the current ward rounds (Mean ± SD 3.71 ± 0.72). For their desired ward rounds, management of patients received the highest score (Mean ± SD 4.64 ± 0.55), followed by bedside examinations (Mean ± SD 4.60 ± 0.61) and clinical skills teaching (Mean ± SD 4.50 ± 0.68). The postgraduates desired a lot more focus on communication skills, counselling and medical ethics as compared to students, whose primary focus was teaching of bedside examination and management. A majority of the respondents (87%) preferred bedside rounds over conference room rounds. Even though the duration of rounds was found to be adequate, a majority of the trainees (68%) felt there was a lack of individual attention during ward rounds.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This study highlights important areas where ward rounds need improvement in order to maximize their benefit to the learners. There is a need to modify the current state of ward rounds in order to address the needs and expectations of trainees.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/10/53
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Riaz Mehmood
Ali Syed
Motiwala Afaq
Tariq Muhammad
Awan Safia
Akhter Jaweed
spellingShingle Riaz Mehmood
Ali Syed
Motiwala Afaq
Tariq Muhammad
Awan Safia
Akhter Jaweed
The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study
BMC Medical Education
author_facet Riaz Mehmood
Ali Syed
Motiwala Afaq
Tariq Muhammad
Awan Safia
Akhter Jaweed
author_sort Riaz Mehmood
title The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study
title_short The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study
title_full The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study
title_sort learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Education
issn 1472-6920
publishDate 2010-07-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Ward rounds form an integral part of Internal Medicine teaching. This study aimed to determine the trainees' opinions regarding various aspects of their ward rounds, including how well they cover their learning needs, how they would like the rounds to be conducted, and differences of opinion between medical students and postgraduates.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A cross-sectional study was conducted on a total of 134 trainees in Internal Medicine, comprising medical students, interns, residents and fellows, who were asked to fill in a structured, self-designed questionnaire. Most of the responses required a rating on a scale of 1-5 (1 being highly unsatisfactory and 5 being highly satisfactory).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Teaching of clinical skills and bedside teaching received the lowest overall mean score (Mean ± SD 2.48 ± 1.02 and 2.49 ± 1.12 respectively). They were rated much lower by postgraduates as compared to students (p < 0.001). All respondents felt that management of patients was the aspect best covered by the current ward rounds (Mean ± SD 3.71 ± 0.72). For their desired ward rounds, management of patients received the highest score (Mean ± SD 4.64 ± 0.55), followed by bedside examinations (Mean ± SD 4.60 ± 0.61) and clinical skills teaching (Mean ± SD 4.50 ± 0.68). The postgraduates desired a lot more focus on communication skills, counselling and medical ethics as compared to students, whose primary focus was teaching of bedside examination and management. A majority of the respondents (87%) preferred bedside rounds over conference room rounds. Even though the duration of rounds was found to be adequate, a majority of the trainees (68%) felt there was a lack of individual attention during ward rounds.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This study highlights important areas where ward rounds need improvement in order to maximize their benefit to the learners. There is a need to modify the current state of ward rounds in order to address the needs and expectations of trainees.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/10/53
work_keys_str_mv AT riazmehmood thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
AT alisyed thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
AT motiwalaafaq thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
AT tariqmuhammad thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
AT awansafia thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
AT akhterjaweed thelearnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
AT riazmehmood learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
AT alisyed learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
AT motiwalaafaq learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
AT tariqmuhammad learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
AT awansafia learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
AT akhterjaweed learnersperspectiveoninternalmedicinewardroundsacrosssectionalstudy
_version_ 1724489664253919232