Collective action on the western range: coping with external and internal threats

Collaborative natural resource management institutions enable agents with diverse interests to come together to solve complex problems. These actors must overcome a series of collective action problems to create, maintain, and evolve these institutions. In addition to the challenge of heterogeneous...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abigail M. York, Michael L. Schoon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services) 2011-09-01
Series:International Journal of the Commons
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/286
id doaj-95066c5ae81f4cd1b529381eb879a9e4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-95066c5ae81f4cd1b529381eb879a9e42020-11-25T02:10:00ZengUtrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)International Journal of the Commons1875-02812011-09-015238840910.18352/ijc.286132Collective action on the western range: coping with external and internal threatsAbigail M. York0Michael L. Schoon1Arizona State UniversityArizona State UniversityCollaborative natural resource management institutions enable agents with diverse interests to come together to solve complex problems. These actors must overcome a series of collective action problems to create, maintain, and evolve these institutions. In addition to the challenge of heterogeneous actors, these commons social-ecological systems often face internal and external threats or disturbances. The institutional arrangements may be effective with problems that are internal to a social-ecological system – ones that they are designed to handle, but how do these arrangements cope with external disturbances, especially ones caused by large-scale political and economic decisions, events, and processes. Using ethnographic and archival data we conduct an institutional analysis outlining the existing and emerging collaboratives, the important actors, and ongoing efforts to cope with the five major challenges identified by rangeland actors. We trace the evolution of institutions on the western range with a focus on their ability to cope with challenges that are largely within the system – biodiversity, fire, and water management, and those that are driven externally by actors who are largely absent – border militarization and violence and exurbanization.https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/286collaborative governancecollective actiondisturbanceinstitutionsrangeland
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abigail M. York
Michael L. Schoon
spellingShingle Abigail M. York
Michael L. Schoon
Collective action on the western range: coping with external and internal threats
International Journal of the Commons
collaborative governance
collective action
disturbance
institutions
rangeland
author_facet Abigail M. York
Michael L. Schoon
author_sort Abigail M. York
title Collective action on the western range: coping with external and internal threats
title_short Collective action on the western range: coping with external and internal threats
title_full Collective action on the western range: coping with external and internal threats
title_fullStr Collective action on the western range: coping with external and internal threats
title_full_unstemmed Collective action on the western range: coping with external and internal threats
title_sort collective action on the western range: coping with external and internal threats
publisher Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)
series International Journal of the Commons
issn 1875-0281
publishDate 2011-09-01
description Collaborative natural resource management institutions enable agents with diverse interests to come together to solve complex problems. These actors must overcome a series of collective action problems to create, maintain, and evolve these institutions. In addition to the challenge of heterogeneous actors, these commons social-ecological systems often face internal and external threats or disturbances. The institutional arrangements may be effective with problems that are internal to a social-ecological system – ones that they are designed to handle, but how do these arrangements cope with external disturbances, especially ones caused by large-scale political and economic decisions, events, and processes. Using ethnographic and archival data we conduct an institutional analysis outlining the existing and emerging collaboratives, the important actors, and ongoing efforts to cope with the five major challenges identified by rangeland actors. We trace the evolution of institutions on the western range with a focus on their ability to cope with challenges that are largely within the system – biodiversity, fire, and water management, and those that are driven externally by actors who are largely absent – border militarization and violence and exurbanization.
topic collaborative governance
collective action
disturbance
institutions
rangeland
url https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/286
work_keys_str_mv AT abigailmyork collectiveactiononthewesternrangecopingwithexternalandinternalthreats
AT michaellschoon collectiveactiononthewesternrangecopingwithexternalandinternalthreats
_version_ 1724921324838584320