Impact of Collaboration on Research Quality: A Case Analysis of Dental Research
<p>Collaboration is a central aspect of research, with variable impact on research output and quality. Its assessment is commonly based on citation count, but this is an inadequate measure in biomedical research. The aim of this preliminary study is to determine the impact of collaboration at...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Regional Information Center for Science and Technology (RICeST)
2016-12-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Information Science and Management |
Online Access: | https://ijism.ricest.ac.ir/index.php/ijism/article/view/939 |
id |
doaj-9505758e19e6497c8281d672272b0f02 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9505758e19e6497c8281d672272b0f022020-11-25T02:59:17ZengRegional Information Center for Science and Technology (RICeST)International Journal of Information Science and Management 2008-83022008-83102016-12-01151273Impact of Collaboration on Research Quality: A Case Analysis of Dental ResearchRicardo Cartes-Velásquez0Carlos Manterola1Assistant Professor, School of Dentistry, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, ChileFull Professor, PhD Program in Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.<p>Collaboration is a central aspect of research, with variable impact on research output and quality. Its assessment is commonly based on citation count, but this is an inadequate measure in biomedical research. The aim of this preliminary study is to determine the impact of collaboration at three levels on the quality of dental therapy research using a valid and reliable instrument. Ninety-nine papers published in four ISI dental journals were analyzed using the MINCIR scale for methodological quality (MQ). Correlations and a linear regression model were used to determine the impact of collaboration on MQ. There was a positive and significant correlation between MQ and number of authors (r=0.2991; p=0.0026) and countries (r=0.2253; p=0.0249), but not institutions (r=0.1750; p=0.0832). The linear regression model for MQ explains 20.32% of the variance; only the number of authors and journal quartile were significant. Collaboration has little impact on MQ in this area.</p>https://ijism.ricest.ac.ir/index.php/ijism/article/view/939 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ricardo Cartes-Velásquez Carlos Manterola |
spellingShingle |
Ricardo Cartes-Velásquez Carlos Manterola Impact of Collaboration on Research Quality: A Case Analysis of Dental Research International Journal of Information Science and Management |
author_facet |
Ricardo Cartes-Velásquez Carlos Manterola |
author_sort |
Ricardo Cartes-Velásquez |
title |
Impact of Collaboration on Research Quality: A Case Analysis of Dental Research |
title_short |
Impact of Collaboration on Research Quality: A Case Analysis of Dental Research |
title_full |
Impact of Collaboration on Research Quality: A Case Analysis of Dental Research |
title_fullStr |
Impact of Collaboration on Research Quality: A Case Analysis of Dental Research |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of Collaboration on Research Quality: A Case Analysis of Dental Research |
title_sort |
impact of collaboration on research quality: a case analysis of dental research |
publisher |
Regional Information Center for Science and Technology (RICeST) |
series |
International Journal of Information Science and Management |
issn |
2008-8302 2008-8310 |
publishDate |
2016-12-01 |
description |
<p>Collaboration is a central aspect of research, with variable impact on research output and quality. Its assessment is commonly based on citation count, but this is an inadequate measure in biomedical research. The aim of this preliminary study is to determine the impact of collaboration at three levels on the quality of dental therapy research using a valid and reliable instrument. Ninety-nine papers published in four ISI dental journals were analyzed using the MINCIR scale for methodological quality (MQ). Correlations and a linear regression model were used to determine the impact of collaboration on MQ. There was a positive and significant correlation between MQ and number of authors (r=0.2991; p=0.0026) and countries (r=0.2253; p=0.0249), but not institutions (r=0.1750; p=0.0832). The linear regression model for MQ explains 20.32% of the variance; only the number of authors and journal quartile were significant. Collaboration has little impact on MQ in this area.</p> |
url |
https://ijism.ricest.ac.ir/index.php/ijism/article/view/939 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ricardocartesvelasquez impactofcollaborationonresearchqualityacaseanalysisofdentalresearch AT carlosmanterola impactofcollaborationonresearchqualityacaseanalysisofdentalresearch |
_version_ |
1724703199658508288 |