A retrospective assessment of different endodontic treatment protocols

Background The aim of this study was to assess the clinical impact of non-surgical root canal treatments (NSRCT) performed with different treatment protocols on the probability of tooth survival without untoward events and to identify predictors influencing the outcome. Methods During the period fro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas Bartols, Carsten Bormann, Luisa Werner, Melanie Schienle, Winfried Walther, Christof E. Dörfer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2020-01-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/8495.pdf
id doaj-94d126d5d2c84f8eb01c869235f38d60
record_format Article
spelling doaj-94d126d5d2c84f8eb01c869235f38d602020-11-25T01:49:22ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592020-01-018e849510.7717/peerj.8495A retrospective assessment of different endodontic treatment protocolsAndreas Bartols0Carsten Bormann1Luisa Werner2Melanie Schienle3Winfried Walther4Christof E. Dörfer5Dental Academy for Continuing Professional Development Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, GermanyChair of Econometrics and Statistics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, GermanyChair of Econometrics and Statistics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, GermanyChair of Econometrics and Statistics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, GermanyDental Academy for Continuing Professional Development Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, GermanyClinic for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, School for Dental Medicine, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, GermanyBackground The aim of this study was to assess the clinical impact of non-surgical root canal treatments (NSRCT) performed with different treatment protocols on the probability of tooth survival without untoward events and to identify predictors influencing the outcome. Methods During the period from July 1999 to October 2016, 5,858 patients were identified in which 9,967 NSRCTs were performed. The treatments were followed up and divided into three groups. In Group 1 root canal treatment was performed with hand instruments, in Group 2 with multiple file rotary instruments and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and Group 3 was treated with Reciproc instruments and PUI. Untoward events were defined as orthograde retreatment, apicoectomy or extraction of the tooth after initial treatment. Weibull regression was used to analyse the data. Results A total of 9,938 cases could be included into the analyses. The results showed 5-years predicted survival rates without untoward events of 73.9% (95% CI [71.7%–76.1%]), 75.1% (95% CI [71.7%–78.0%]) and 78.4% (95% CI [75.1%–81.4%]) for study group 1 (N = 5,580), 2 (N = 1,700) and 3 (N = 2,658), respectively. The differences between Group 1 and 3 were statistically significant (p < 0.006). Higher age of the patient (per year increase) and number of earlier NSRCTs (per unit increase) reduce the survival without untoward events statistically significant (both p < 0.02), while treatment of premolars had a statistically significant lower hazard ratio [0.89 (95% CI [0.79–0.99]; p = 0.030)] compared to treatment of molars and anterior teeth. A higher number of supportive periodontal treatments (per unit increase) improved tooth survival without untoward events highly significant (p < 0.0001). Discussion More recent endodontic treatment protocols involving reciprocating instruments and PUI appear to be associated with higher tooth survival rates without untoward events compared to hand instruments.https://peerj.com/articles/8495.pdfNon-surgical endodontic treatmentRoot canal treatmentEndodontic outcomeStainless steel hand filesRotary NiTi multiple filesSingle files
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andreas Bartols
Carsten Bormann
Luisa Werner
Melanie Schienle
Winfried Walther
Christof E. Dörfer
spellingShingle Andreas Bartols
Carsten Bormann
Luisa Werner
Melanie Schienle
Winfried Walther
Christof E. Dörfer
A retrospective assessment of different endodontic treatment protocols
PeerJ
Non-surgical endodontic treatment
Root canal treatment
Endodontic outcome
Stainless steel hand files
Rotary NiTi multiple files
Single files
author_facet Andreas Bartols
Carsten Bormann
Luisa Werner
Melanie Schienle
Winfried Walther
Christof E. Dörfer
author_sort Andreas Bartols
title A retrospective assessment of different endodontic treatment protocols
title_short A retrospective assessment of different endodontic treatment protocols
title_full A retrospective assessment of different endodontic treatment protocols
title_fullStr A retrospective assessment of different endodontic treatment protocols
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective assessment of different endodontic treatment protocols
title_sort retrospective assessment of different endodontic treatment protocols
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ
issn 2167-8359
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Background The aim of this study was to assess the clinical impact of non-surgical root canal treatments (NSRCT) performed with different treatment protocols on the probability of tooth survival without untoward events and to identify predictors influencing the outcome. Methods During the period from July 1999 to October 2016, 5,858 patients were identified in which 9,967 NSRCTs were performed. The treatments were followed up and divided into three groups. In Group 1 root canal treatment was performed with hand instruments, in Group 2 with multiple file rotary instruments and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and Group 3 was treated with Reciproc instruments and PUI. Untoward events were defined as orthograde retreatment, apicoectomy or extraction of the tooth after initial treatment. Weibull regression was used to analyse the data. Results A total of 9,938 cases could be included into the analyses. The results showed 5-years predicted survival rates without untoward events of 73.9% (95% CI [71.7%–76.1%]), 75.1% (95% CI [71.7%–78.0%]) and 78.4% (95% CI [75.1%–81.4%]) for study group 1 (N = 5,580), 2 (N = 1,700) and 3 (N = 2,658), respectively. The differences between Group 1 and 3 were statistically significant (p < 0.006). Higher age of the patient (per year increase) and number of earlier NSRCTs (per unit increase) reduce the survival without untoward events statistically significant (both p < 0.02), while treatment of premolars had a statistically significant lower hazard ratio [0.89 (95% CI [0.79–0.99]; p = 0.030)] compared to treatment of molars and anterior teeth. A higher number of supportive periodontal treatments (per unit increase) improved tooth survival without untoward events highly significant (p < 0.0001). Discussion More recent endodontic treatment protocols involving reciprocating instruments and PUI appear to be associated with higher tooth survival rates without untoward events compared to hand instruments.
topic Non-surgical endodontic treatment
Root canal treatment
Endodontic outcome
Stainless steel hand files
Rotary NiTi multiple files
Single files
url https://peerj.com/articles/8495.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasbartols aretrospectiveassessmentofdifferentendodontictreatmentprotocols
AT carstenbormann aretrospectiveassessmentofdifferentendodontictreatmentprotocols
AT luisawerner aretrospectiveassessmentofdifferentendodontictreatmentprotocols
AT melanieschienle aretrospectiveassessmentofdifferentendodontictreatmentprotocols
AT winfriedwalther aretrospectiveassessmentofdifferentendodontictreatmentprotocols
AT christofedorfer aretrospectiveassessmentofdifferentendodontictreatmentprotocols
AT andreasbartols retrospectiveassessmentofdifferentendodontictreatmentprotocols
AT carstenbormann retrospectiveassessmentofdifferentendodontictreatmentprotocols
AT luisawerner retrospectiveassessmentofdifferentendodontictreatmentprotocols
AT melanieschienle retrospectiveassessmentofdifferentendodontictreatmentprotocols
AT winfriedwalther retrospectiveassessmentofdifferentendodontictreatmentprotocols
AT christofedorfer retrospectiveassessmentofdifferentendodontictreatmentprotocols
_version_ 1725006890123919360