WHERE IS THE DIFFERENCE? THE PROFILE OF THE ROMANIAN CANDIDATES FOR THE 2009 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS
Drawing on a complex dataset that includes the age, gender, education, public experience, party career, wealth, and the occupational background of all 215 candidates proposed by the five Romanian parties winning seats in the 2009 EP elections, this article devises an analytical framework for the can...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
European Institute of Romania
2009-12-01
|
Series: | Romanian Journal of European Affairs |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ier.ro/documente/rjea_vol9_no4/RJEA_2009_vol._9_no_4_Where_is_the_Difference_The_Profile_of_the_Romanian_Candidates_for_the_2009_European_Elections_.pdf |
id |
doaj-94c9bc3043784eb888adcc0657b97df7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-94c9bc3043784eb888adcc0657b97df72020-11-25T02:12:45ZengEuropean Institute of RomaniaRomanian Journal of European Affairs1582-82711841-42732009-12-01947999WHERE IS THE DIFFERENCE? THE PROFILE OF THE ROMANIAN CANDIDATES FOR THE 2009 EUROPEAN ELECTIONSSergiu GherghinaMihail ChiruDrawing on a complex dataset that includes the age, gender, education, public experience, party career, wealth, and the occupational background of all 215 candidates proposed by the five Romanian parties winning seats in the 2009 EP elections, this article devises an analytical framework for the candidates’ profiles. The study is valuable for those researching the professionalization of the EP along the convergence thesis, and for the legislative recruitment scholars interested in candidates’ qualities targeted by selectorates in a blocked-list PR setting, i.e., the significant differences between candidates receiving an eligible place and the rest. Our findings reflect the importance given by parties to previous experience in the EP and to wealth/capacity to contribute to the campaign costs and, at the same time, they emphasize the ambivalent educational trajectories of the candidates and the dominance on the lists of male politicians.http://www.ier.ro/documente/rjea_vol9_no4/RJEA_2009_vol._9_no_4_Where_is_the_Difference_The_Profile_of_the_Romanian_Candidates_for_the_2009_European_Elections_.pdfMEPsprofessionalizationpolitical profilepatterns of recruitmenteligibility |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sergiu Gherghina Mihail Chiru |
spellingShingle |
Sergiu Gherghina Mihail Chiru WHERE IS THE DIFFERENCE? THE PROFILE OF THE ROMANIAN CANDIDATES FOR THE 2009 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS Romanian Journal of European Affairs MEPs professionalization political profile patterns of recruitment eligibility |
author_facet |
Sergiu Gherghina Mihail Chiru |
author_sort |
Sergiu Gherghina |
title |
WHERE IS THE DIFFERENCE? THE PROFILE OF THE ROMANIAN CANDIDATES FOR THE 2009 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS |
title_short |
WHERE IS THE DIFFERENCE? THE PROFILE OF THE ROMANIAN CANDIDATES FOR THE 2009 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS |
title_full |
WHERE IS THE DIFFERENCE? THE PROFILE OF THE ROMANIAN CANDIDATES FOR THE 2009 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS |
title_fullStr |
WHERE IS THE DIFFERENCE? THE PROFILE OF THE ROMANIAN CANDIDATES FOR THE 2009 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS |
title_full_unstemmed |
WHERE IS THE DIFFERENCE? THE PROFILE OF THE ROMANIAN CANDIDATES FOR THE 2009 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS |
title_sort |
where is the difference? the profile of the romanian candidates for the 2009 european elections |
publisher |
European Institute of Romania |
series |
Romanian Journal of European Affairs |
issn |
1582-8271 1841-4273 |
publishDate |
2009-12-01 |
description |
Drawing on a complex dataset that includes the age, gender, education, public experience, party career, wealth, and the occupational background of all 215 candidates proposed by the five Romanian parties winning seats in the 2009 EP elections, this article devises an analytical framework for the candidates’ profiles. The study is valuable for those researching the professionalization of the EP along the convergence thesis, and for the legislative recruitment scholars interested in candidates’ qualities targeted by selectorates in a blocked-list PR setting, i.e., the significant differences between candidates receiving an eligible place and the rest. Our findings reflect the importance given by parties to previous experience in the EP and to wealth/capacity to contribute to the campaign costs and, at the same time, they emphasize the ambivalent educational trajectories of the candidates and the dominance on the lists of male politicians. |
topic |
MEPs professionalization political profile patterns of recruitment eligibility |
url |
http://www.ier.ro/documente/rjea_vol9_no4/RJEA_2009_vol._9_no_4_Where_is_the_Difference_The_Profile_of_the_Romanian_Candidates_for_the_2009_European_Elections_.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sergiugherghina whereisthedifferencetheprofileoftheromaniancandidatesforthe2009europeanelections AT mihailchiru whereisthedifferencetheprofileoftheromaniancandidatesforthe2009europeanelections |
_version_ |
1724908432851468288 |