Monist and Dualist Tendencies in Platonism before Plotinus (in Russian)
The author argues that the Platonism that Plotinus inherits – setting aside Ammonius Saccas, of whom we know all too little – is by the later second century distinctly dualist in tendency, and is able, especially in the case of Plutarch, to quote Plato to its purpose. Plato himself, though, as the a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | ell |
Published: |
Novosibirsk State University Press
2008-01-01
|
Series: | SCHOLE |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.nsu.ru/classics/schole/2/2-1-dillon.pdf |
id |
doaj-94bfd68ff48e4e47bb6808a657e07d8a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-94bfd68ff48e4e47bb6808a657e07d8a2020-11-25T03:35:38ZellNovosibirsk State University PressSCHOLE1995-43281995-43362008-01-01211120Monist and Dualist Tendencies in Platonism before Plotinus (in Russian)Dillon, John0Trinity College, DublinThe author argues that the Platonism that Plotinus inherits – setting aside Ammonius Saccas, of whom we know all too little – is by the later second century distinctly dualist in tendency, and is able, especially in the case of Plutarch, to quote Plato to its purpose. Plato himself, though, as the author maintains, is, despite appearances to the contrary, what one might term a ‘modified monist’. That is to say, he fully recognizes the degree of imperfection and evil in the world, and holds it to be ineradicable, but he does not in the last resort believe in a positive countervailing force to the Good or the One. What we have is simply a negative force, whether Indefinite Dyad, disorderly World-Soul, or Receptacle, which is an inevitable condition of their being a world at all, but which, as a side-effect of introducing diversity, generates various sorts of imperfection. It is this scenario that justifies his follower Hermodorus in declaring that Plato recognizes only a single first principle, and it to this sort of monism – if anything, in a more pronounced form – that Plotinus returns. The article is published in its English version in Vol. I, issue 1http://www.nsu.ru/classics/schole/2/2-1-dillon.pdfmonismdualismOld Academy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
ell |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dillon, John |
spellingShingle |
Dillon, John Monist and Dualist Tendencies in Platonism before Plotinus (in Russian) SCHOLE monism dualism Old Academy |
author_facet |
Dillon, John |
author_sort |
Dillon, John |
title |
Monist and Dualist Tendencies in Platonism before Plotinus (in Russian) |
title_short |
Monist and Dualist Tendencies in Platonism before Plotinus (in Russian) |
title_full |
Monist and Dualist Tendencies in Platonism before Plotinus (in Russian) |
title_fullStr |
Monist and Dualist Tendencies in Platonism before Plotinus (in Russian) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Monist and Dualist Tendencies in Platonism before Plotinus (in Russian) |
title_sort |
monist and dualist tendencies in platonism before plotinus (in russian) |
publisher |
Novosibirsk State University Press |
series |
SCHOLE |
issn |
1995-4328 1995-4336 |
publishDate |
2008-01-01 |
description |
The author argues that the Platonism that Plotinus inherits – setting aside Ammonius Saccas, of whom we know all too little – is by the later second century distinctly dualist in tendency, and is able, especially in the case of Plutarch, to quote Plato to its purpose. Plato himself, though, as the author maintains, is, despite appearances to the contrary, what one might term a ‘modified monist’. That is to say, he fully recognizes the degree of imperfection and evil in the world, and holds it to be ineradicable, but he does not in the last resort believe in a positive countervailing force to the Good or the One. What we have is simply a negative force, whether Indefinite Dyad, disorderly World-Soul, or Receptacle, which is an inevitable condition of their being a world at all, but which, as a side-effect of introducing diversity, generates various sorts of imperfection. It is this scenario that justifies his follower Hermodorus in declaring that Plato recognizes only a single first principle, and it to this sort of monism – if anything, in a more pronounced form – that Plotinus returns. The article is published in its English version in Vol. I, issue 1 |
topic |
monism dualism Old Academy |
url |
http://www.nsu.ru/classics/schole/2/2-1-dillon.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dillonjohn monistanddualisttendenciesinplatonismbeforeplotinusinrussian |
_version_ |
1724553300269858816 |