LATER RETIREMENT? PATTERNS, PREFERENCES, POLICIES

<p>Pension systems are a major part of the political economy of current societies – much beyond providing old-age income security. The well-known demographics of population aging as well as globalization today challenge their financial viability. Later retirement seems to be a good way to meet...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martin Kohli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wydawnictwa AGH 2015-07-01
Series:Studia Humanistyczne AGH
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.agh.edu.pl/human/article/view/1657
id doaj-94bded32325f4c18b0438a1ab5db179a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-94bded32325f4c18b0438a1ab5db179a2021-10-02T06:26:19ZengWydawnictwa AGHStudia Humanistyczne AGH2084-33642015-07-01134193210.7494/human.2014.13.4.19-321221LATER RETIREMENT? PATTERNS, PREFERENCES, POLICIESMartin Kohli0European University Institute<p>Pension systems are a major part of the political economy of current societies – much beyond providing old-age income security. The well-known demographics of population aging as well as globalization today challenge their financial viability. Later retirement seems to be a good way to meet these challenges. However, it is not only unpopular but also inequitable in terms of differential longevity. The paper first discusses these problems, with a particular focus on the social stratification of mortality. It then analyzes the preferences towards retirement age at several levels:  in terms of attitudes towards public spending on pensions or towards the state’s responsibility in this matter, of support for pension policy alternatives, and of preferred individual age of retirement. Results show that large majorities across all age groups are in favour of more government spending on pensions. There is a substantial amount of ‘involuntary retirement’, meaning that people would have preferred to work longer than they actually did, as well as a somewhat lower amount of ‘involuntary work’, but the preferred ages are everywhere below 65, and in some countries still below 60. Finally, the paper examines the policies of raising the retirement age adopted during the last two decades. What has especially been lacking in these policies is a consideration of socially differentiated longevity.</p>https://journals.agh.edu.pl/human/article/view/1657retirementlife expectancyinequalitypension preferencespension policies
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Martin Kohli
spellingShingle Martin Kohli
LATER RETIREMENT? PATTERNS, PREFERENCES, POLICIES
Studia Humanistyczne AGH
retirement
life expectancy
inequality
pension preferences
pension policies
author_facet Martin Kohli
author_sort Martin Kohli
title LATER RETIREMENT? PATTERNS, PREFERENCES, POLICIES
title_short LATER RETIREMENT? PATTERNS, PREFERENCES, POLICIES
title_full LATER RETIREMENT? PATTERNS, PREFERENCES, POLICIES
title_fullStr LATER RETIREMENT? PATTERNS, PREFERENCES, POLICIES
title_full_unstemmed LATER RETIREMENT? PATTERNS, PREFERENCES, POLICIES
title_sort later retirement? patterns, preferences, policies
publisher Wydawnictwa AGH
series Studia Humanistyczne AGH
issn 2084-3364
publishDate 2015-07-01
description <p>Pension systems are a major part of the political economy of current societies – much beyond providing old-age income security. The well-known demographics of population aging as well as globalization today challenge their financial viability. Later retirement seems to be a good way to meet these challenges. However, it is not only unpopular but also inequitable in terms of differential longevity. The paper first discusses these problems, with a particular focus on the social stratification of mortality. It then analyzes the preferences towards retirement age at several levels:  in terms of attitudes towards public spending on pensions or towards the state’s responsibility in this matter, of support for pension policy alternatives, and of preferred individual age of retirement. Results show that large majorities across all age groups are in favour of more government spending on pensions. There is a substantial amount of ‘involuntary retirement’, meaning that people would have preferred to work longer than they actually did, as well as a somewhat lower amount of ‘involuntary work’, but the preferred ages are everywhere below 65, and in some countries still below 60. Finally, the paper examines the policies of raising the retirement age adopted during the last two decades. What has especially been lacking in these policies is a consideration of socially differentiated longevity.</p>
topic retirement
life expectancy
inequality
pension preferences
pension policies
url https://journals.agh.edu.pl/human/article/view/1657
work_keys_str_mv AT martinkohli laterretirementpatternspreferencespolicies
_version_ 1716857761797505024