Water pricing reform, economic welfare and inequality

Access to water has become an important policy goal in South Africa. A tariff system including free access for the basic residential water supply, and an increasing block tariff has been introduced all over the country. Water is a necessity, but for most households the marginal consumption is used f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mikko Moilanen, Carl-Erik Schulz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2002-06-01
Series:South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences
Online Access:https://sajems.org/index.php/sajems/article/view/2680
id doaj-94bd11a098314686a8a32180aaa7c336
record_format Article
spelling doaj-94bd11a098314686a8a32180aaa7c3362020-11-25T01:52:33ZengAOSISSouth African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences1015-88122222-34362002-06-015235437810.4102/sajems.v5i2.2680803Water pricing reform, economic welfare and inequalityMikko Moilanen0Carl-Erik Schulz1Department of Economics, University of TromsøDepartment of Economics, University of the Western CapeAccess to water has become an important policy goal in South Africa. A tariff system including free access for the basic residential water supply, and an increasing block tariff has been introduced all over the country. Water is a necessity, but for most households the marginal consumption is used for less important options. This must be reflected both in the water demand and in the pricing policy. This article introduces three different welfare functions, all including a group of rich consumers and a group of poor ones. The standard additive utility welfare, the weighted utility welfare and the Rawlsian welfare function are all used. For each of them the block tariff system is used to find the maximum welfare. We also discuss how the 'water for free' policy affects welfare, and how to set a low price segment or a free amount of water and the block tariff in each case. For each tariff system we also do comparative statistics of the parameters to study how changes in the policy approach will influence the optimal water tariff system. In conclusion the article explains how the choice of pricing policy can reflect the underlying welfare considerations.https://sajems.org/index.php/sajems/article/view/2680
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mikko Moilanen
Carl-Erik Schulz
spellingShingle Mikko Moilanen
Carl-Erik Schulz
Water pricing reform, economic welfare and inequality
South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences
author_facet Mikko Moilanen
Carl-Erik Schulz
author_sort Mikko Moilanen
title Water pricing reform, economic welfare and inequality
title_short Water pricing reform, economic welfare and inequality
title_full Water pricing reform, economic welfare and inequality
title_fullStr Water pricing reform, economic welfare and inequality
title_full_unstemmed Water pricing reform, economic welfare and inequality
title_sort water pricing reform, economic welfare and inequality
publisher AOSIS
series South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences
issn 1015-8812
2222-3436
publishDate 2002-06-01
description Access to water has become an important policy goal in South Africa. A tariff system including free access for the basic residential water supply, and an increasing block tariff has been introduced all over the country. Water is a necessity, but for most households the marginal consumption is used for less important options. This must be reflected both in the water demand and in the pricing policy. This article introduces three different welfare functions, all including a group of rich consumers and a group of poor ones. The standard additive utility welfare, the weighted utility welfare and the Rawlsian welfare function are all used. For each of them the block tariff system is used to find the maximum welfare. We also discuss how the 'water for free' policy affects welfare, and how to set a low price segment or a free amount of water and the block tariff in each case. For each tariff system we also do comparative statistics of the parameters to study how changes in the policy approach will influence the optimal water tariff system. In conclusion the article explains how the choice of pricing policy can reflect the underlying welfare considerations.
url https://sajems.org/index.php/sajems/article/view/2680
work_keys_str_mv AT mikkomoilanen waterpricingreformeconomicwelfareandinequality
AT carlerikschulz waterpricingreformeconomicwelfareandinequality
_version_ 1724994527893127168