Water pricing reform, economic welfare and inequality
Access to water has become an important policy goal in South Africa. A tariff system including free access for the basic residential water supply, and an increasing block tariff has been introduced all over the country. Water is a necessity, but for most households the marginal consumption is used f...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
AOSIS
2002-06-01
|
Series: | South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences |
Online Access: | https://sajems.org/index.php/sajems/article/view/2680 |
id |
doaj-94bd11a098314686a8a32180aaa7c336 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-94bd11a098314686a8a32180aaa7c3362020-11-25T01:52:33ZengAOSISSouth African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences1015-88122222-34362002-06-015235437810.4102/sajems.v5i2.2680803Water pricing reform, economic welfare and inequalityMikko Moilanen0Carl-Erik Schulz1Department of Economics, University of TromsøDepartment of Economics, University of the Western CapeAccess to water has become an important policy goal in South Africa. A tariff system including free access for the basic residential water supply, and an increasing block tariff has been introduced all over the country. Water is a necessity, but for most households the marginal consumption is used for less important options. This must be reflected both in the water demand and in the pricing policy. This article introduces three different welfare functions, all including a group of rich consumers and a group of poor ones. The standard additive utility welfare, the weighted utility welfare and the Rawlsian welfare function are all used. For each of them the block tariff system is used to find the maximum welfare. We also discuss how the 'water for free' policy affects welfare, and how to set a low price segment or a free amount of water and the block tariff in each case. For each tariff system we also do comparative statistics of the parameters to study how changes in the policy approach will influence the optimal water tariff system. In conclusion the article explains how the choice of pricing policy can reflect the underlying welfare considerations.https://sajems.org/index.php/sajems/article/view/2680 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mikko Moilanen Carl-Erik Schulz |
spellingShingle |
Mikko Moilanen Carl-Erik Schulz Water pricing reform, economic welfare and inequality South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences |
author_facet |
Mikko Moilanen Carl-Erik Schulz |
author_sort |
Mikko Moilanen |
title |
Water pricing reform, economic welfare and inequality |
title_short |
Water pricing reform, economic welfare and inequality |
title_full |
Water pricing reform, economic welfare and inequality |
title_fullStr |
Water pricing reform, economic welfare and inequality |
title_full_unstemmed |
Water pricing reform, economic welfare and inequality |
title_sort |
water pricing reform, economic welfare and inequality |
publisher |
AOSIS |
series |
South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences |
issn |
1015-8812 2222-3436 |
publishDate |
2002-06-01 |
description |
Access to water has become an important policy goal in South Africa. A tariff system including free access for the basic residential water supply, and an increasing block tariff has been introduced all over the country. Water is a necessity, but for most households the marginal consumption is used for less important options. This must be reflected both in the water demand and in the pricing policy. This article introduces three different welfare functions, all including a group of rich consumers and a group of poor ones. The standard additive utility welfare, the weighted utility welfare and the Rawlsian welfare function are all used. For each of them the block tariff system is used to find the maximum welfare. We also discuss how the 'water for free' policy affects welfare, and how to set a low price segment or a free amount of water and the block tariff in each case. For each tariff system we also do comparative statistics of the parameters to study how changes in the policy approach will influence the optimal water tariff system. In conclusion the article explains how the choice of pricing policy can reflect the underlying welfare considerations. |
url |
https://sajems.org/index.php/sajems/article/view/2680 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mikkomoilanen waterpricingreformeconomicwelfareandinequality AT carlerikschulz waterpricingreformeconomicwelfareandinequality |
_version_ |
1724994527893127168 |