Contrast Effect on the P300 Component: Passive Versus Active Tasks

Objective: Contrast perception could be influenced by top-down factors. We measured P300 component, a well-documented index for top-down influence in visual functions, to examine such effect. Methods: Twelve participants, 18- to 50-years old, with normal or correct-to-normal visual acuity participat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuchin Su, Chien-Chung Chen, Hung-Hsiang Liu, Li-Ting Tsai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2011-05-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1068/ic380
id doaj-94bce0d295d74c0eabdaaa729b380c04
record_format Article
spelling doaj-94bce0d295d74c0eabdaaa729b380c042020-11-25T02:54:29ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952011-05-01210.1068/ic38010.1068_ic380Contrast Effect on the P300 Component: Passive Versus Active TasksYuchin Su0Chien-Chung Chen1Hung-Hsiang Liu2Li-Ting Tsai3Department of Neurology, Buddhist Tzu Chi Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanDepartment of Psychology, National Taiwan University, TaiwanDepartment of Psychology, National Taiwan University, TaiwanSchool of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, TaiwanObjective: Contrast perception could be influenced by top-down factors. We measured P300 component, a well-documented index for top-down influence in visual functions, to examine such effect. Methods: Twelve participants, 18- to 50-years old, with normal or correct-to-normal visual acuity participated in the study. Standard two-stimulus oddball paradigm was employed. Target stimuli were Gabor patch with 4 cy/degree spatial frequency and 90% contrast. In an attempt to mimic clinical population, event-related potential (ERP) was recorded in (1) the passive viewing condition, in which the participants were instructed to fixate at the center of screen; and (2) the active condition, in which the participants were required to press a button to indicate the presence of a target. Participants performed passive task before active task. The probability that a target was presented in a trial was either 50% or 30% in a run. P300 oddball effect was defined as the difference in ERP between 30% and 50% probability conditions. Results: A reliable P300 oddball effects was found under active condition. For passive viewing condition, P300 oddball effects were not apparent. Conclusion: The findings support the hypothesis that P300 reflects the task-dependent top-down effect in visual functions.https://doi.org/10.1068/ic380
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yuchin Su
Chien-Chung Chen
Hung-Hsiang Liu
Li-Ting Tsai
spellingShingle Yuchin Su
Chien-Chung Chen
Hung-Hsiang Liu
Li-Ting Tsai
Contrast Effect on the P300 Component: Passive Versus Active Tasks
i-Perception
author_facet Yuchin Su
Chien-Chung Chen
Hung-Hsiang Liu
Li-Ting Tsai
author_sort Yuchin Su
title Contrast Effect on the P300 Component: Passive Versus Active Tasks
title_short Contrast Effect on the P300 Component: Passive Versus Active Tasks
title_full Contrast Effect on the P300 Component: Passive Versus Active Tasks
title_fullStr Contrast Effect on the P300 Component: Passive Versus Active Tasks
title_full_unstemmed Contrast Effect on the P300 Component: Passive Versus Active Tasks
title_sort contrast effect on the p300 component: passive versus active tasks
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2011-05-01
description Objective: Contrast perception could be influenced by top-down factors. We measured P300 component, a well-documented index for top-down influence in visual functions, to examine such effect. Methods: Twelve participants, 18- to 50-years old, with normal or correct-to-normal visual acuity participated in the study. Standard two-stimulus oddball paradigm was employed. Target stimuli were Gabor patch with 4 cy/degree spatial frequency and 90% contrast. In an attempt to mimic clinical population, event-related potential (ERP) was recorded in (1) the passive viewing condition, in which the participants were instructed to fixate at the center of screen; and (2) the active condition, in which the participants were required to press a button to indicate the presence of a target. Participants performed passive task before active task. The probability that a target was presented in a trial was either 50% or 30% in a run. P300 oddball effect was defined as the difference in ERP between 30% and 50% probability conditions. Results: A reliable P300 oddball effects was found under active condition. For passive viewing condition, P300 oddball effects were not apparent. Conclusion: The findings support the hypothesis that P300 reflects the task-dependent top-down effect in visual functions.
url https://doi.org/10.1068/ic380
work_keys_str_mv AT yuchinsu contrasteffectonthep300componentpassiveversusactivetasks
AT chienchungchen contrasteffectonthep300componentpassiveversusactivetasks
AT hunghsiangliu contrasteffectonthep300componentpassiveversusactivetasks
AT litingtsai contrasteffectonthep300componentpassiveversusactivetasks
_version_ 1724720932970299392