Effectiveness and Safety of Peritoneal Dialysis Treatment in Patients with Refractory Congestive Heart Failure due to Chronic Cardiorenal Syndrome

Aims. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in treating refractory congestive heart failure (RCHF) with cardiorenal syndrome (CRS). Methods. A total of 36 patients with RCHF were divided into type 2 CRS group (group A) and non-type 2 CRS group (group B) according to th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qiuyuan Shao, Yangyang Xia, Min Zhao, Jing Liu, Qingyan Zhang, Bo Jin, Jun Xie, Biao Xu, Rujun Gong, Chunming Jiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6529283
id doaj-94bc12f3483647cc8088e7694776791a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-94bc12f3483647cc8088e7694776791a2020-11-24T23:11:35ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412018-01-01201810.1155/2018/65292836529283Effectiveness and Safety of Peritoneal Dialysis Treatment in Patients with Refractory Congestive Heart Failure due to Chronic Cardiorenal SyndromeQiuyuan Shao0Yangyang Xia1Min Zhao2Jing Liu3Qingyan Zhang4Bo Jin5Jun Xie6Biao Xu7Rujun Gong8Chunming Jiang9Department of Nephrology, Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Nephrology, Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Nephrology, Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Nephrology, Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Nephrology, Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Nephrology, Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Medicine, University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, OH, USADepartment of Nephrology, Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, ChinaAims. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in treating refractory congestive heart failure (RCHF) with cardiorenal syndrome (CRS). Methods. A total of 36 patients with RCHF were divided into type 2 CRS group (group A) and non-type 2 CRS group (group B) according to the patients’ clinical presentations and the ratio of serum urea to creatinine and urinary analyses in this prospective study. All patients were followed up till death or discontinuation of PD. Data were collected for analysis, including patient survival time on PD, technique failure, changes of heart function, and complications associated with PD treatment and hospitalization. Results. There were 27 deaths and 9 patients quitting PD program after a follow-up for 73 months with an average PD time of 22.8±18.2 months. A significant longer PD time was found in group B as compared with that in group A (29.0±19.4 versus 13.1±10.6 months, p=0.003). Kaplan–Meier curves showed a higher survival probability in group B than that in group A (p<0.001). Multivariate regression demonstrated that type 2 CRS was an independent risk factor for short survival time on PD. The benefit of PD on the improvement of survival and LVEF was limited to group B patients, but absent from group A patients. The impairment of exercise tolerance indicated by NYHA classification was markedly improved by PD for both groups. The technique survival was high, and the hospital readmission was evidently decreased for both group A and group B patients. Conclusions. Our data suggest that PD is a safe and feasible palliative treatment for RCHF with type 2 CRS, though the long-term survival could not be expected for patients with the type 2 CRS. Registration ID Number is ChiCTR1800015910.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6529283
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Qiuyuan Shao
Yangyang Xia
Min Zhao
Jing Liu
Qingyan Zhang
Bo Jin
Jun Xie
Biao Xu
Rujun Gong
Chunming Jiang
spellingShingle Qiuyuan Shao
Yangyang Xia
Min Zhao
Jing Liu
Qingyan Zhang
Bo Jin
Jun Xie
Biao Xu
Rujun Gong
Chunming Jiang
Effectiveness and Safety of Peritoneal Dialysis Treatment in Patients with Refractory Congestive Heart Failure due to Chronic Cardiorenal Syndrome
BioMed Research International
author_facet Qiuyuan Shao
Yangyang Xia
Min Zhao
Jing Liu
Qingyan Zhang
Bo Jin
Jun Xie
Biao Xu
Rujun Gong
Chunming Jiang
author_sort Qiuyuan Shao
title Effectiveness and Safety of Peritoneal Dialysis Treatment in Patients with Refractory Congestive Heart Failure due to Chronic Cardiorenal Syndrome
title_short Effectiveness and Safety of Peritoneal Dialysis Treatment in Patients with Refractory Congestive Heart Failure due to Chronic Cardiorenal Syndrome
title_full Effectiveness and Safety of Peritoneal Dialysis Treatment in Patients with Refractory Congestive Heart Failure due to Chronic Cardiorenal Syndrome
title_fullStr Effectiveness and Safety of Peritoneal Dialysis Treatment in Patients with Refractory Congestive Heart Failure due to Chronic Cardiorenal Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and Safety of Peritoneal Dialysis Treatment in Patients with Refractory Congestive Heart Failure due to Chronic Cardiorenal Syndrome
title_sort effectiveness and safety of peritoneal dialysis treatment in patients with refractory congestive heart failure due to chronic cardiorenal syndrome
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Aims. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in treating refractory congestive heart failure (RCHF) with cardiorenal syndrome (CRS). Methods. A total of 36 patients with RCHF were divided into type 2 CRS group (group A) and non-type 2 CRS group (group B) according to the patients’ clinical presentations and the ratio of serum urea to creatinine and urinary analyses in this prospective study. All patients were followed up till death or discontinuation of PD. Data were collected for analysis, including patient survival time on PD, technique failure, changes of heart function, and complications associated with PD treatment and hospitalization. Results. There were 27 deaths and 9 patients quitting PD program after a follow-up for 73 months with an average PD time of 22.8±18.2 months. A significant longer PD time was found in group B as compared with that in group A (29.0±19.4 versus 13.1±10.6 months, p=0.003). Kaplan–Meier curves showed a higher survival probability in group B than that in group A (p<0.001). Multivariate regression demonstrated that type 2 CRS was an independent risk factor for short survival time on PD. The benefit of PD on the improvement of survival and LVEF was limited to group B patients, but absent from group A patients. The impairment of exercise tolerance indicated by NYHA classification was markedly improved by PD for both groups. The technique survival was high, and the hospital readmission was evidently decreased for both group A and group B patients. Conclusions. Our data suggest that PD is a safe and feasible palliative treatment for RCHF with type 2 CRS, though the long-term survival could not be expected for patients with the type 2 CRS. Registration ID Number is ChiCTR1800015910.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6529283
work_keys_str_mv AT qiuyuanshao effectivenessandsafetyofperitonealdialysistreatmentinpatientswithrefractorycongestiveheartfailureduetochroniccardiorenalsyndrome
AT yangyangxia effectivenessandsafetyofperitonealdialysistreatmentinpatientswithrefractorycongestiveheartfailureduetochroniccardiorenalsyndrome
AT minzhao effectivenessandsafetyofperitonealdialysistreatmentinpatientswithrefractorycongestiveheartfailureduetochroniccardiorenalsyndrome
AT jingliu effectivenessandsafetyofperitonealdialysistreatmentinpatientswithrefractorycongestiveheartfailureduetochroniccardiorenalsyndrome
AT qingyanzhang effectivenessandsafetyofperitonealdialysistreatmentinpatientswithrefractorycongestiveheartfailureduetochroniccardiorenalsyndrome
AT bojin effectivenessandsafetyofperitonealdialysistreatmentinpatientswithrefractorycongestiveheartfailureduetochroniccardiorenalsyndrome
AT junxie effectivenessandsafetyofperitonealdialysistreatmentinpatientswithrefractorycongestiveheartfailureduetochroniccardiorenalsyndrome
AT biaoxu effectivenessandsafetyofperitonealdialysistreatmentinpatientswithrefractorycongestiveheartfailureduetochroniccardiorenalsyndrome
AT rujungong effectivenessandsafetyofperitonealdialysistreatmentinpatientswithrefractorycongestiveheartfailureduetochroniccardiorenalsyndrome
AT chunmingjiang effectivenessandsafetyofperitonealdialysistreatmentinpatientswithrefractorycongestiveheartfailureduetochroniccardiorenalsyndrome
_version_ 1725603751014694912