Oviposition preferences for ethanol depend on spatial arrangement and differ dramatically among closely related Drosophila species

Recent work on the model fly Drosophila melanogaster has reported inconsistencies in their preference for laying eggs on intermediate concentrations of ethanol. In this study, we resolve this discrepancy by showing that this species strongly prefers ovipositing on ethanol when it is close to a non-e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matt Sumethasorn, Thomas L. Turner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Company of Biologists 2016-11-01
Series:Biology Open
Subjects:
Online Access:http://bio.biologists.org/content/5/11/1642
id doaj-94b19de1e5254677876d25fa4f749666
record_format Article
spelling doaj-94b19de1e5254677876d25fa4f7496662021-06-02T18:52:52ZengThe Company of BiologistsBiology Open2046-63902016-11-015111642164710.1242/bio.019380019380Oviposition preferences for ethanol depend on spatial arrangement and differ dramatically among closely related Drosophila speciesMatt Sumethasorn0Thomas L. Turner1 Ecological Biology, 9620 UC Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-00 Ecological Biology, 9620 UC Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-00 Recent work on the model fly Drosophila melanogaster has reported inconsistencies in their preference for laying eggs on intermediate concentrations of ethanol. In this study, we resolve this discrepancy by showing that this species strongly prefers ovipositing on ethanol when it is close to a non-ethanol substrate, but strongly avoids ethanol when options are farther apart. We also show fluidity of these behaviors among other Drosophila species: D. melanogaster is more responsive to ethanol than close relatives in that it prefers ethanol more than other species in the close-proximity case, but avoids ethanol more than other species in the distant case. In the close-proximity scenario, the more ethanol-tolerant species generally prefer ethanol more, with the exception of the island endemic D. santomea. This species has the lowest tolerance in the clade, but behaves like D. melanogaster. We speculate that this could be an adaptation to protect eggs from parasites or predators such as parasitoid wasps, as larvae migrate to non-toxic substrates after hatching. These natural differences among species are an excellent opportunity to study how genes and brains evolve to alter ethanol preferences, and provide an interesting model for genetic variation in preferences in other organisms, including humans.http://bio.biologists.org/content/5/11/1642BehaviorEvolutionDecision making
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matt Sumethasorn
Thomas L. Turner
spellingShingle Matt Sumethasorn
Thomas L. Turner
Oviposition preferences for ethanol depend on spatial arrangement and differ dramatically among closely related Drosophila species
Biology Open
Behavior
Evolution
Decision making
author_facet Matt Sumethasorn
Thomas L. Turner
author_sort Matt Sumethasorn
title Oviposition preferences for ethanol depend on spatial arrangement and differ dramatically among closely related Drosophila species
title_short Oviposition preferences for ethanol depend on spatial arrangement and differ dramatically among closely related Drosophila species
title_full Oviposition preferences for ethanol depend on spatial arrangement and differ dramatically among closely related Drosophila species
title_fullStr Oviposition preferences for ethanol depend on spatial arrangement and differ dramatically among closely related Drosophila species
title_full_unstemmed Oviposition preferences for ethanol depend on spatial arrangement and differ dramatically among closely related Drosophila species
title_sort oviposition preferences for ethanol depend on spatial arrangement and differ dramatically among closely related drosophila species
publisher The Company of Biologists
series Biology Open
issn 2046-6390
publishDate 2016-11-01
description Recent work on the model fly Drosophila melanogaster has reported inconsistencies in their preference for laying eggs on intermediate concentrations of ethanol. In this study, we resolve this discrepancy by showing that this species strongly prefers ovipositing on ethanol when it is close to a non-ethanol substrate, but strongly avoids ethanol when options are farther apart. We also show fluidity of these behaviors among other Drosophila species: D. melanogaster is more responsive to ethanol than close relatives in that it prefers ethanol more than other species in the close-proximity case, but avoids ethanol more than other species in the distant case. In the close-proximity scenario, the more ethanol-tolerant species generally prefer ethanol more, with the exception of the island endemic D. santomea. This species has the lowest tolerance in the clade, but behaves like D. melanogaster. We speculate that this could be an adaptation to protect eggs from parasites or predators such as parasitoid wasps, as larvae migrate to non-toxic substrates after hatching. These natural differences among species are an excellent opportunity to study how genes and brains evolve to alter ethanol preferences, and provide an interesting model for genetic variation in preferences in other organisms, including humans.
topic Behavior
Evolution
Decision making
url http://bio.biologists.org/content/5/11/1642
work_keys_str_mv AT mattsumethasorn ovipositionpreferencesforethanoldependonspatialarrangementanddifferdramaticallyamongcloselyrelateddrosophilaspecies
AT thomaslturner ovipositionpreferencesforethanoldependonspatialarrangementanddifferdramaticallyamongcloselyrelateddrosophilaspecies
_version_ 1721402088405073920