Microstructural Studies of Materials DD1 and KT2 By X-Ray Diffraction

In this work, we have studied two Kaolin .kaolin DD1 which consists of two main phases (kaolinite and Halloysite) and Tamazert kaolin .kaolin KT2 whose main constituents are kaolinite, quartz and mica. Our choice was set on the component that is Kaolinite because of the existence of the latter in bo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abdelghani Lakel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Amar Telidji of Laghouat 2019-03-01
Series:Journal of Building Materials and Structures
Subjects:
drx
Online Access:http://journals.lagh-univ.dz/index.php/jbms/article/view/65
id doaj-94a0954a044742fbbe9c1f3f6a03be61
record_format Article
spelling doaj-94a0954a044742fbbe9c1f3f6a03be612020-11-25T03:00:18ZengUniversity Amar Telidji of LaghouatJournal of Building Materials and Structures2353-00572019-03-0161203110.5281/zenodo.260660065Microstructural Studies of Materials DD1 and KT2 By X-Ray DiffractionAbdelghani Lakel0Laboratoire TTSM, Université Biskra, AlgérieIn this work, we have studied two Kaolin .kaolin DD1 which consists of two main phases (kaolinite and Halloysite) and Tamazert kaolin .kaolin KT2 whose main constituents are kaolinite, quartz and mica. Our choice was set on the component that is Kaolinite because of the existence of the latter in both kaolins. A correction of Lorentz-Polarization was carried out prior to the diffraction data, which has been achieved using LWL program dome. The true profile was extracted by this program. The methods used for the micro structural analysis of the present in the two Kaolins are the Warren - Averbach and the Williamson – Hall methods Scherrer's relationship has been applied in cases where the compound is devoid of strains. The study revealed that the kaolin Kaolinite DD1 is devoid of micro constraints. Which similar analysis has shown that the Kaolinite in KT2 incorporates the strains. This was confirmed by the Williamson - Hall method as well as Fourier analysis. The evaluation of strains in the Kaolinite of KT2 has been dome the method of Warren - Averbach and Williamson – Hall diagram. The average value of this constraint found by the first method us 0.15 and 0.21 by the second method gave. The average size of crystallites of the Kaolinite in DD1 was found between 29 Å and 230 Å. by the method of Warren - Averbach and about 118 Å by the method of Williamson - Hall. Range the second Kaolinite the Kaolinite KT2, the size obtained was respectively 98 Å and 130 Å using to by methods. The study of the size distribution showed that the dominant size of Kaolinite in DD1 and KT2 is about 40 Å (42%) and 58 Å (32%). respectively.http://journals.lagh-univ.dz/index.php/jbms/article/view/65drxlwl methodscrystallites sizemicrodéfomationwilliamson-hall and warren & averbach methods
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abdelghani Lakel
spellingShingle Abdelghani Lakel
Microstructural Studies of Materials DD1 and KT2 By X-Ray Diffraction
Journal of Building Materials and Structures
drx
lwl methods
crystallites size
microdéfomation
williamson-hall and warren & averbach methods
author_facet Abdelghani Lakel
author_sort Abdelghani Lakel
title Microstructural Studies of Materials DD1 and KT2 By X-Ray Diffraction
title_short Microstructural Studies of Materials DD1 and KT2 By X-Ray Diffraction
title_full Microstructural Studies of Materials DD1 and KT2 By X-Ray Diffraction
title_fullStr Microstructural Studies of Materials DD1 and KT2 By X-Ray Diffraction
title_full_unstemmed Microstructural Studies of Materials DD1 and KT2 By X-Ray Diffraction
title_sort microstructural studies of materials dd1 and kt2 by x-ray diffraction
publisher University Amar Telidji of Laghouat
series Journal of Building Materials and Structures
issn 2353-0057
publishDate 2019-03-01
description In this work, we have studied two Kaolin .kaolin DD1 which consists of two main phases (kaolinite and Halloysite) and Tamazert kaolin .kaolin KT2 whose main constituents are kaolinite, quartz and mica. Our choice was set on the component that is Kaolinite because of the existence of the latter in both kaolins. A correction of Lorentz-Polarization was carried out prior to the diffraction data, which has been achieved using LWL program dome. The true profile was extracted by this program. The methods used for the micro structural analysis of the present in the two Kaolins are the Warren - Averbach and the Williamson – Hall methods Scherrer's relationship has been applied in cases where the compound is devoid of strains. The study revealed that the kaolin Kaolinite DD1 is devoid of micro constraints. Which similar analysis has shown that the Kaolinite in KT2 incorporates the strains. This was confirmed by the Williamson - Hall method as well as Fourier analysis. The evaluation of strains in the Kaolinite of KT2 has been dome the method of Warren - Averbach and Williamson – Hall diagram. The average value of this constraint found by the first method us 0.15 and 0.21 by the second method gave. The average size of crystallites of the Kaolinite in DD1 was found between 29 Å and 230 Å. by the method of Warren - Averbach and about 118 Å by the method of Williamson - Hall. Range the second Kaolinite the Kaolinite KT2, the size obtained was respectively 98 Å and 130 Å using to by methods. The study of the size distribution showed that the dominant size of Kaolinite in DD1 and KT2 is about 40 Å (42%) and 58 Å (32%). respectively.
topic drx
lwl methods
crystallites size
microdéfomation
williamson-hall and warren & averbach methods
url http://journals.lagh-univ.dz/index.php/jbms/article/view/65
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelghanilakel microstructuralstudiesofmaterialsdd1andkt2byxraydiffraction
_version_ 1724698988236505088