Interpretation of democracy, pluralism and tolerance among the young activists of Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama

Anarchism and other forms of violence committed by religious groups and mass organizations are still very common in Indonesia. There have been violations of human rights, religious freedom and civil liberties, which are essential pillars of democracy. Indonesia, as a country that adheres to religiou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Maksum, Priyono Tri Febrianto, Esa Nur Wahyuni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Airlangga 2019-09-01
Series:Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik
Subjects:
Online Access:https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/MKP/article/view/13963
id doaj-949374717f3f48b1a4f887d8b8d355c4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-949374717f3f48b1a4f887d8b8d355c42020-11-24T21:58:37ZengUniversitas AirlanggaMasyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik2086-70502528-60132019-09-0132327528910.20473/mkp.V32I32019.275-2897339Interpretation of democracy, pluralism and tolerance among the young activists of Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul UlamaAli Maksum0Priyono Tri Febrianto1Esa Nur Wahyuni2Universitas BrawijayaUniversitas TrunojoyoUIN Maulana Malik IbrahimAnarchism and other forms of violence committed by religious groups and mass organizations are still very common in Indonesia. There have been violations of human rights, religious freedom and civil liberties, which are essential pillars of democracy. Indonesia, as a country that adheres to religious freedom regards all forms of intolerance as violations of democracy. This study described and explored the views of young cadres of Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) in Malang, East Java, about democracy, pluralism and tolerance. This research intended to unravel some of the issues of how young generations of Muhammadiyah and NU understand democracy, pluralism and tolerance and if their views are associated with their social construction. This study employed qualitative methods using interviews and direct observations to collect the data. The results of this study showed there were differences in the patterns between the younger generation and the older generation of Muhammadiyah. The members of Muhammadiyah recognized that the young cadres of Muhammadiyah tended to act more violently towards intolerant mass organizations compared to their senior (old cadre) generation. The senior cadres, such as the Muhammadiyah Youth, were more likely to be calm when responding to the presence of radical organizations. The senior cadres of Muhammadiyah tended to be open-minded with the community organizations that are perceived by the public to be a radical mass organization, which is fundamental in addressing the presence of radical organizations. This view indicated by the absence sense of precariousness or a situation that is considered to be very threatening to religious and national life while still in the corridor of diversity. On the other hand, the younger generation of Nahdlatul Ulama showed a different pattern, revealing that their seniors tended to be harsher in responding to radical organizations and supporting mass organizations.https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/MKP/article/view/13963democracypluralismtolerancemuhammadiyahnahdlatul ulama
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ali Maksum
Priyono Tri Febrianto
Esa Nur Wahyuni
spellingShingle Ali Maksum
Priyono Tri Febrianto
Esa Nur Wahyuni
Interpretation of democracy, pluralism and tolerance among the young activists of Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama
Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik
democracy
pluralism
tolerance
muhammadiyah
nahdlatul ulama
author_facet Ali Maksum
Priyono Tri Febrianto
Esa Nur Wahyuni
author_sort Ali Maksum
title Interpretation of democracy, pluralism and tolerance among the young activists of Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama
title_short Interpretation of democracy, pluralism and tolerance among the young activists of Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama
title_full Interpretation of democracy, pluralism and tolerance among the young activists of Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama
title_fullStr Interpretation of democracy, pluralism and tolerance among the young activists of Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama
title_full_unstemmed Interpretation of democracy, pluralism and tolerance among the young activists of Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama
title_sort interpretation of democracy, pluralism and tolerance among the young activists of muhammadiyah and nahdlatul ulama
publisher Universitas Airlangga
series Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik
issn 2086-7050
2528-6013
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Anarchism and other forms of violence committed by religious groups and mass organizations are still very common in Indonesia. There have been violations of human rights, religious freedom and civil liberties, which are essential pillars of democracy. Indonesia, as a country that adheres to religious freedom regards all forms of intolerance as violations of democracy. This study described and explored the views of young cadres of Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) in Malang, East Java, about democracy, pluralism and tolerance. This research intended to unravel some of the issues of how young generations of Muhammadiyah and NU understand democracy, pluralism and tolerance and if their views are associated with their social construction. This study employed qualitative methods using interviews and direct observations to collect the data. The results of this study showed there were differences in the patterns between the younger generation and the older generation of Muhammadiyah. The members of Muhammadiyah recognized that the young cadres of Muhammadiyah tended to act more violently towards intolerant mass organizations compared to their senior (old cadre) generation. The senior cadres, such as the Muhammadiyah Youth, were more likely to be calm when responding to the presence of radical organizations. The senior cadres of Muhammadiyah tended to be open-minded with the community organizations that are perceived by the public to be a radical mass organization, which is fundamental in addressing the presence of radical organizations. This view indicated by the absence sense of precariousness or a situation that is considered to be very threatening to religious and national life while still in the corridor of diversity. On the other hand, the younger generation of Nahdlatul Ulama showed a different pattern, revealing that their seniors tended to be harsher in responding to radical organizations and supporting mass organizations.
topic democracy
pluralism
tolerance
muhammadiyah
nahdlatul ulama
url https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/MKP/article/view/13963
work_keys_str_mv AT alimaksum interpretationofdemocracypluralismandtoleranceamongtheyoungactivistsofmuhammadiyahandnahdlatululama
AT priyonotrifebrianto interpretationofdemocracypluralismandtoleranceamongtheyoungactivistsofmuhammadiyahandnahdlatululama
AT esanurwahyuni interpretationofdemocracypluralismandtoleranceamongtheyoungactivistsofmuhammadiyahandnahdlatululama
_version_ 1725851163677425664