Training methods in optical diagnosis and characterization of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and study aims Correct optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps is crucial to implement a resect and discard strategy. Training methods have been proposed to reach recommended optical diagnosis thresholds. The aim of our study was to present a systematic review and meta-analysis on optical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samuel C.L. Smith, Keith Siau, Rosanna Cannatelli, Giulio Antonelli, Uday N. Shivaji, Subrata Ghosh, John R. Saltzman, Cesare Hassan, Marietta Iacucci
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-04-01
Series:Endoscopy International Open
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1381-7181
id doaj-948549316eef4141a5d0426251c35a92
record_format Article
spelling doaj-948549316eef4141a5d0426251c35a922021-04-23T00:24:59ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362021-04-010905E716E72610.1055/a-1381-7181Training methods in optical diagnosis and characterization of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysisSamuel C.L. Smith0Keith Siau1Rosanna Cannatelli2Giulio Antonelli3Uday N. Shivaji4Subrata Ghosh5John R. Saltzman6Cesare Hassan7Marietta Iacucci8Institute of Translational Medicine and Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, United KingdomUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United KingdomInstitute of Translational Medicine and Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, United KingdomEndoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, ItalyInstitute of Translational Medicine and Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, United KingdomInstitute of Translational Medicine and Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, United KingdomDepartment of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United StatesEndoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, ItalyInstitute of Translational Medicine and Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, United KingdomBackground and study aims Correct optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps is crucial to implement a resect and discard strategy. Training methods have been proposed to reach recommended optical diagnosis thresholds. The aim of our study was to present a systematic review and meta-analysis on optical diagnosis training. Methods PubMed/Medline and Cochrane databases were searched between 1980 and October 2019 for studies reporting outcomes on optical diagnosis training of colorectal polyps. The primary outcome was optical diagnosis accuracy compared to histological analysis pre-training and post-training intervention. Subgroup analyses of experienced/trainee endoscopists, training methods, and small/diminutive polyps were included. Results Overall, 16 studies met inclusion criteria, analyzing the impact of training on 179 endoscopists. Pre-training accuracy was 70.3 % (6416/9131 correct diagnoses) whereas post-training accuracy was 81.6 % (7416/9213 correct diagnoses) (risk ratio [RR] 1.17; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.09–1.24, P < 0.001). In experienced endoscopists, accuracy improved from 69.8 % (3771/5403 correct diagnoses) to 82.4 % (4521/5485 correct diagnoses) (RR 1.20; 95 % CI: 1.11–1.29, P < 0.001). Among trainees, accuracy improved from 69.6 % (2645/3803 correct diagnoses) to 78.8 % (2995/3803 correct diagnoses) (RR 1.14; 95 % CI 1.06–1.24, P < 0.001). In the small/diminutive polyp subgroup, accuracy improved from 68.1 % (3549/5214 correct diagnoses) to 77.1 % (4022/5214 correct diagnoses) in (RR 1.16 95 % CI 1.08–1.24 P < 0.001). On meta-regression analysis, the improvement in accuracy did not differ between computerized vs. didactic training approaches for experienced (P = 0.792) and trainee endoscopists (P = 0.312). Conclusions Optical diagnosis training is effective in improving accuracy of histology prediction in colorectal polyps. Didactic and computer-based training show comparable effectiveness in improving diagnostic accuracy.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1381-7181
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Samuel C.L. Smith
Keith Siau
Rosanna Cannatelli
Giulio Antonelli
Uday N. Shivaji
Subrata Ghosh
John R. Saltzman
Cesare Hassan
Marietta Iacucci
spellingShingle Samuel C.L. Smith
Keith Siau
Rosanna Cannatelli
Giulio Antonelli
Uday N. Shivaji
Subrata Ghosh
John R. Saltzman
Cesare Hassan
Marietta Iacucci
Training methods in optical diagnosis and characterization of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Endoscopy International Open
author_facet Samuel C.L. Smith
Keith Siau
Rosanna Cannatelli
Giulio Antonelli
Uday N. Shivaji
Subrata Ghosh
John R. Saltzman
Cesare Hassan
Marietta Iacucci
author_sort Samuel C.L. Smith
title Training methods in optical diagnosis and characterization of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Training methods in optical diagnosis and characterization of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Training methods in optical diagnosis and characterization of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Training methods in optical diagnosis and characterization of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Training methods in optical diagnosis and characterization of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort training methods in optical diagnosis and characterization of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
series Endoscopy International Open
issn 2364-3722
2196-9736
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Background and study aims Correct optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps is crucial to implement a resect and discard strategy. Training methods have been proposed to reach recommended optical diagnosis thresholds. The aim of our study was to present a systematic review and meta-analysis on optical diagnosis training. Methods PubMed/Medline and Cochrane databases were searched between 1980 and October 2019 for studies reporting outcomes on optical diagnosis training of colorectal polyps. The primary outcome was optical diagnosis accuracy compared to histological analysis pre-training and post-training intervention. Subgroup analyses of experienced/trainee endoscopists, training methods, and small/diminutive polyps were included. Results Overall, 16 studies met inclusion criteria, analyzing the impact of training on 179 endoscopists. Pre-training accuracy was 70.3 % (6416/9131 correct diagnoses) whereas post-training accuracy was 81.6 % (7416/9213 correct diagnoses) (risk ratio [RR] 1.17; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.09–1.24, P < 0.001). In experienced endoscopists, accuracy improved from 69.8 % (3771/5403 correct diagnoses) to 82.4 % (4521/5485 correct diagnoses) (RR 1.20; 95 % CI: 1.11–1.29, P < 0.001). Among trainees, accuracy improved from 69.6 % (2645/3803 correct diagnoses) to 78.8 % (2995/3803 correct diagnoses) (RR 1.14; 95 % CI 1.06–1.24, P < 0.001). In the small/diminutive polyp subgroup, accuracy improved from 68.1 % (3549/5214 correct diagnoses) to 77.1 % (4022/5214 correct diagnoses) in (RR 1.16 95 % CI 1.08–1.24 P < 0.001). On meta-regression analysis, the improvement in accuracy did not differ between computerized vs. didactic training approaches for experienced (P = 0.792) and trainee endoscopists (P = 0.312). Conclusions Optical diagnosis training is effective in improving accuracy of histology prediction in colorectal polyps. Didactic and computer-based training show comparable effectiveness in improving diagnostic accuracy.
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1381-7181
work_keys_str_mv AT samuelclsmith trainingmethodsinopticaldiagnosisandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT keithsiau trainingmethodsinopticaldiagnosisandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rosannacannatelli trainingmethodsinopticaldiagnosisandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT giulioantonelli trainingmethodsinopticaldiagnosisandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT udaynshivaji trainingmethodsinopticaldiagnosisandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT subrataghosh trainingmethodsinopticaldiagnosisandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT johnrsaltzman trainingmethodsinopticaldiagnosisandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cesarehassan trainingmethodsinopticaldiagnosisandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mariettaiacucci trainingmethodsinopticaldiagnosisandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1721513684907327488