Training methods in optical diagnosis and characterization of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background and study aims Correct optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps is crucial to implement a resect and discard strategy. Training methods have been proposed to reach recommended optical diagnosis thresholds. The aim of our study was to present a systematic review and meta-analysis on optical...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Endoscopy International Open |
Online Access: | http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1381-7181 |
id |
doaj-948549316eef4141a5d0426251c35a92 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-948549316eef4141a5d0426251c35a922021-04-23T00:24:59ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362021-04-010905E716E72610.1055/a-1381-7181Training methods in optical diagnosis and characterization of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysisSamuel C.L. Smith0Keith Siau1Rosanna Cannatelli2Giulio Antonelli3Uday N. Shivaji4Subrata Ghosh5John R. Saltzman6Cesare Hassan7Marietta Iacucci8Institute of Translational Medicine and Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, United KingdomUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United KingdomInstitute of Translational Medicine and Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, United KingdomEndoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, ItalyInstitute of Translational Medicine and Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, United KingdomInstitute of Translational Medicine and Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, United KingdomDepartment of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United StatesEndoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, ItalyInstitute of Translational Medicine and Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, United KingdomBackground and study aims Correct optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps is crucial to implement a resect and discard strategy. Training methods have been proposed to reach recommended optical diagnosis thresholds. The aim of our study was to present a systematic review and meta-analysis on optical diagnosis training. Methods PubMed/Medline and Cochrane databases were searched between 1980 and October 2019 for studies reporting outcomes on optical diagnosis training of colorectal polyps. The primary outcome was optical diagnosis accuracy compared to histological analysis pre-training and post-training intervention. Subgroup analyses of experienced/trainee endoscopists, training methods, and small/diminutive polyps were included. Results Overall, 16 studies met inclusion criteria, analyzing the impact of training on 179 endoscopists. Pre-training accuracy was 70.3 % (6416/9131 correct diagnoses) whereas post-training accuracy was 81.6 % (7416/9213 correct diagnoses) (risk ratio [RR] 1.17; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.09–1.24, P < 0.001). In experienced endoscopists, accuracy improved from 69.8 % (3771/5403 correct diagnoses) to 82.4 % (4521/5485 correct diagnoses) (RR 1.20; 95 % CI: 1.11–1.29, P < 0.001). Among trainees, accuracy improved from 69.6 % (2645/3803 correct diagnoses) to 78.8 % (2995/3803 correct diagnoses) (RR 1.14; 95 % CI 1.06–1.24, P < 0.001). In the small/diminutive polyp subgroup, accuracy improved from 68.1 % (3549/5214 correct diagnoses) to 77.1 % (4022/5214 correct diagnoses) in (RR 1.16 95 % CI 1.08–1.24 P < 0.001). On meta-regression analysis, the improvement in accuracy did not differ between computerized vs. didactic training approaches for experienced (P = 0.792) and trainee endoscopists (P = 0.312). Conclusions Optical diagnosis training is effective in improving accuracy of histology prediction in colorectal polyps. Didactic and computer-based training show comparable effectiveness in improving diagnostic accuracy.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1381-7181 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Samuel C.L. Smith Keith Siau Rosanna Cannatelli Giulio Antonelli Uday N. Shivaji Subrata Ghosh John R. Saltzman Cesare Hassan Marietta Iacucci |
spellingShingle |
Samuel C.L. Smith Keith Siau Rosanna Cannatelli Giulio Antonelli Uday N. Shivaji Subrata Ghosh John R. Saltzman Cesare Hassan Marietta Iacucci Training methods in optical diagnosis and characterization of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis Endoscopy International Open |
author_facet |
Samuel C.L. Smith Keith Siau Rosanna Cannatelli Giulio Antonelli Uday N. Shivaji Subrata Ghosh John R. Saltzman Cesare Hassan Marietta Iacucci |
author_sort |
Samuel C.L. Smith |
title |
Training methods in optical diagnosis and characterization of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short |
Training methods in optical diagnosis and characterization of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Training methods in optical diagnosis and characterization of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Training methods in optical diagnosis and characterization of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Training methods in optical diagnosis and characterization of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
training methods in optical diagnosis and characterization of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
publisher |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
series |
Endoscopy International Open |
issn |
2364-3722 2196-9736 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
Background and study aims Correct optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps is crucial to implement a resect and discard strategy. Training methods have been proposed to reach recommended optical diagnosis thresholds. The aim of our study was to present a systematic review and meta-analysis on optical diagnosis training.
Methods PubMed/Medline and Cochrane databases were searched between 1980 and October 2019 for studies reporting outcomes on optical diagnosis training of colorectal polyps. The primary outcome was optical diagnosis accuracy compared to histological analysis pre-training and post-training intervention. Subgroup analyses of experienced/trainee endoscopists, training methods, and small/diminutive polyps were included.
Results Overall, 16 studies met inclusion criteria, analyzing the impact of training on 179 endoscopists. Pre-training accuracy was 70.3 % (6416/9131 correct diagnoses) whereas post-training accuracy was 81.6 % (7416/9213 correct diagnoses) (risk ratio [RR] 1.17; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.09–1.24, P < 0.001). In experienced endoscopists, accuracy improved from 69.8 % (3771/5403 correct diagnoses) to 82.4 % (4521/5485 correct diagnoses) (RR 1.20; 95 % CI: 1.11–1.29, P < 0.001). Among trainees, accuracy improved from 69.6 % (2645/3803 correct diagnoses) to 78.8 % (2995/3803 correct diagnoses) (RR 1.14; 95 % CI 1.06–1.24, P < 0.001). In the small/diminutive polyp subgroup, accuracy improved from 68.1 % (3549/5214 correct diagnoses) to 77.1 % (4022/5214 correct diagnoses) in (RR 1.16 95 % CI 1.08–1.24 P < 0.001). On meta-regression analysis, the improvement in accuracy did not differ between computerized vs. didactic training approaches for experienced (P = 0.792) and trainee endoscopists (P = 0.312).
Conclusions Optical diagnosis training is effective in improving accuracy of histology prediction in colorectal polyps. Didactic and computer-based training show comparable effectiveness in improving diagnostic accuracy. |
url |
http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1381-7181 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT samuelclsmith trainingmethodsinopticaldiagnosisandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT keithsiau trainingmethodsinopticaldiagnosisandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rosannacannatelli trainingmethodsinopticaldiagnosisandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT giulioantonelli trainingmethodsinopticaldiagnosisandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT udaynshivaji trainingmethodsinopticaldiagnosisandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT subrataghosh trainingmethodsinopticaldiagnosisandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT johnrsaltzman trainingmethodsinopticaldiagnosisandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cesarehassan trainingmethodsinopticaldiagnosisandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mariettaiacucci trainingmethodsinopticaldiagnosisandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1721513684907327488 |