Negativity Bias in Dangerous Drivers.

The behavioral and cognitive characteristics of dangerous drivers differ significantly from those of safe drivers. However, differences in emotional information processing have seldom been investigated. Previous studies have revealed that drivers with higher anger/anxiety trait scores are more likel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jing Chai, Weina Qu, Xianghong Sun, Kan Zhang, Yan Ge
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4713152?pdf=render
id doaj-9481dd390fa5431f96eba369738d5244
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9481dd390fa5431f96eba369738d52442020-11-25T01:25:35ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01111e014708310.1371/journal.pone.0147083Negativity Bias in Dangerous Drivers.Jing ChaiWeina QuXianghong SunKan ZhangYan GeThe behavioral and cognitive characteristics of dangerous drivers differ significantly from those of safe drivers. However, differences in emotional information processing have seldom been investigated. Previous studies have revealed that drivers with higher anger/anxiety trait scores are more likely to be involved in crashes and that individuals with higher anger traits exhibit stronger negativity biases when processing emotions compared with control groups. However, researchers have not explored the relationship between emotional information processing and driving behavior. In this study, we examined the emotional information processing differences between dangerous drivers and safe drivers. Thirty-eight non-professional drivers were divided into two groups according to the penalty points that they had accrued for traffic violations: 15 drivers with 6 or more points were included in the dangerous driver group, and 23 drivers with 3 or fewer points were included in the safe driver group. The emotional Stroop task was used to measure negativity biases, and both behavioral and electroencephalograph data were recorded. The behavioral results revealed stronger negativity biases in the dangerous drivers than in the safe drivers. The bias score was correlated with self-reported dangerous driving behavior. Drivers with strong negativity biases reported having been involved in mores crashes compared with the less-biased drivers. The event-related potentials (ERPs) revealed that the dangerous drivers exhibited reduced P3 components when responding to negative stimuli, suggesting decreased inhibitory control of information that is task-irrelevant but emotionally salient. The influence of negativity bias provides one possible explanation of the effects of individual differences on dangerous driving behavior and traffic crashes.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4713152?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jing Chai
Weina Qu
Xianghong Sun
Kan Zhang
Yan Ge
spellingShingle Jing Chai
Weina Qu
Xianghong Sun
Kan Zhang
Yan Ge
Negativity Bias in Dangerous Drivers.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jing Chai
Weina Qu
Xianghong Sun
Kan Zhang
Yan Ge
author_sort Jing Chai
title Negativity Bias in Dangerous Drivers.
title_short Negativity Bias in Dangerous Drivers.
title_full Negativity Bias in Dangerous Drivers.
title_fullStr Negativity Bias in Dangerous Drivers.
title_full_unstemmed Negativity Bias in Dangerous Drivers.
title_sort negativity bias in dangerous drivers.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description The behavioral and cognitive characteristics of dangerous drivers differ significantly from those of safe drivers. However, differences in emotional information processing have seldom been investigated. Previous studies have revealed that drivers with higher anger/anxiety trait scores are more likely to be involved in crashes and that individuals with higher anger traits exhibit stronger negativity biases when processing emotions compared with control groups. However, researchers have not explored the relationship between emotional information processing and driving behavior. In this study, we examined the emotional information processing differences between dangerous drivers and safe drivers. Thirty-eight non-professional drivers were divided into two groups according to the penalty points that they had accrued for traffic violations: 15 drivers with 6 or more points were included in the dangerous driver group, and 23 drivers with 3 or fewer points were included in the safe driver group. The emotional Stroop task was used to measure negativity biases, and both behavioral and electroencephalograph data were recorded. The behavioral results revealed stronger negativity biases in the dangerous drivers than in the safe drivers. The bias score was correlated with self-reported dangerous driving behavior. Drivers with strong negativity biases reported having been involved in mores crashes compared with the less-biased drivers. The event-related potentials (ERPs) revealed that the dangerous drivers exhibited reduced P3 components when responding to negative stimuli, suggesting decreased inhibitory control of information that is task-irrelevant but emotionally salient. The influence of negativity bias provides one possible explanation of the effects of individual differences on dangerous driving behavior and traffic crashes.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4713152?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT jingchai negativitybiasindangerousdrivers
AT weinaqu negativitybiasindangerousdrivers
AT xianghongsun negativitybiasindangerousdrivers
AT kanzhang negativitybiasindangerousdrivers
AT yange negativitybiasindangerousdrivers
_version_ 1725113175175593984