Evaluation Methods of Water Environment Safety and Their Application to the Three Northeast Provinces of China
Focusing on the topic of water environment safety of China, this paper has selected the three northeast provinces of China as the research object due to their representativeness in economic development and resource security. By using the Entropy Weight Method, the Grey Correlation Analysis Method, a...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/5135 |
id |
doaj-947fdbfaecdb47ec842d8a32c91bd8ae |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-947fdbfaecdb47ec842d8a32c91bd8ae2020-11-24T21:26:28ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-09-011118513510.3390/su11185135su11185135Evaluation Methods of Water Environment Safety and Their Application to the Three Northeast Provinces of ChinaYuangang Li0Maohua Sun1Guanghui Yuan2Yujing Liu3Business School, Dalian University of Foreign Languages, Dalian 116044, ChinaSchool of Foreign Language, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, ChinaFintech Research Institute & School of Information Management and Engineering, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, ChinaSchool of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, ChinaFocusing on the topic of water environment safety of China, this paper has selected the three northeast provinces of China as the research object due to their representativeness in economic development and resource security. By using the Entropy Weight Method, the Grey Correlation Analysis Method, and the Principal Component Analysis Method, this paper has first constructed a water environment safety evaluation system with 17 indicators from the economic, environmental, and ecological aspects. Furthermore, this paper has screened the initially selected indicators by the Principal Component Analysis Method and finally determined 11 indicators as the evaluation indicators. After indicator screening, this paper has adopted the improved Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method to evaluate the water environment safety of the three northeast provinces of China and obtained the change in water environment safety of different provinces from 2009 to 2017. The results show that the overall water environment safety of the region had improved first but worsened afterward, and that in terms of water safety level, Jilin Province ranked first, followed by Heilongjiang Province and Liaoning Province. The three factors that have the greatest impact on the water environment safety of the three provinces are: Liaoning—Chemical Oxygen Demand (score: 17.10), Per Capita Disposable Income (score: 13.50), and Secondary Industry Output (score: 11.50); Heilongjiang—Chemical Oxygen Demand (score: 18.64), Per Capita Water Resources (score: 12.75), and Concentration of Inhalable Particles (score: 10.89); Jilin—Per Capita Water Resources (score: 15.75), Chemical Oxygen Demand (score: 14.87), and Service Industry Output (score: 11.55). Based on analysis of the evaluation results, this paper has proposed corresponding policy recommendations to improve the water environment safety and promote sustainable development in the northeast provinces of China.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/5135water environment safetythe three northeast provinces of Chinaprincipal component analysisfuzzy comprehensive evaluationsustainable development |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yuangang Li Maohua Sun Guanghui Yuan Yujing Liu |
spellingShingle |
Yuangang Li Maohua Sun Guanghui Yuan Yujing Liu Evaluation Methods of Water Environment Safety and Their Application to the Three Northeast Provinces of China Sustainability water environment safety the three northeast provinces of China principal component analysis fuzzy comprehensive evaluation sustainable development |
author_facet |
Yuangang Li Maohua Sun Guanghui Yuan Yujing Liu |
author_sort |
Yuangang Li |
title |
Evaluation Methods of Water Environment Safety and Their Application to the Three Northeast Provinces of China |
title_short |
Evaluation Methods of Water Environment Safety and Their Application to the Three Northeast Provinces of China |
title_full |
Evaluation Methods of Water Environment Safety and Their Application to the Three Northeast Provinces of China |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation Methods of Water Environment Safety and Their Application to the Three Northeast Provinces of China |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation Methods of Water Environment Safety and Their Application to the Three Northeast Provinces of China |
title_sort |
evaluation methods of water environment safety and their application to the three northeast provinces of china |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2019-09-01 |
description |
Focusing on the topic of water environment safety of China, this paper has selected the three northeast provinces of China as the research object due to their representativeness in economic development and resource security. By using the Entropy Weight Method, the Grey Correlation Analysis Method, and the Principal Component Analysis Method, this paper has first constructed a water environment safety evaluation system with 17 indicators from the economic, environmental, and ecological aspects. Furthermore, this paper has screened the initially selected indicators by the Principal Component Analysis Method and finally determined 11 indicators as the evaluation indicators. After indicator screening, this paper has adopted the improved Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method to evaluate the water environment safety of the three northeast provinces of China and obtained the change in water environment safety of different provinces from 2009 to 2017. The results show that the overall water environment safety of the region had improved first but worsened afterward, and that in terms of water safety level, Jilin Province ranked first, followed by Heilongjiang Province and Liaoning Province. The three factors that have the greatest impact on the water environment safety of the three provinces are: Liaoning—Chemical Oxygen Demand (score: 17.10), Per Capita Disposable Income (score: 13.50), and Secondary Industry Output (score: 11.50); Heilongjiang—Chemical Oxygen Demand (score: 18.64), Per Capita Water Resources (score: 12.75), and Concentration of Inhalable Particles (score: 10.89); Jilin—Per Capita Water Resources (score: 15.75), Chemical Oxygen Demand (score: 14.87), and Service Industry Output (score: 11.55). Based on analysis of the evaluation results, this paper has proposed corresponding policy recommendations to improve the water environment safety and promote sustainable development in the northeast provinces of China. |
topic |
water environment safety the three northeast provinces of China principal component analysis fuzzy comprehensive evaluation sustainable development |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/5135 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yuangangli evaluationmethodsofwaterenvironmentsafetyandtheirapplicationtothethreenortheastprovincesofchina AT maohuasun evaluationmethodsofwaterenvironmentsafetyandtheirapplicationtothethreenortheastprovincesofchina AT guanghuiyuan evaluationmethodsofwaterenvironmentsafetyandtheirapplicationtothethreenortheastprovincesofchina AT yujingliu evaluationmethodsofwaterenvironmentsafetyandtheirapplicationtothethreenortheastprovincesofchina |
_version_ |
1725979579329282048 |