The influence of the people’s will in Constitutional Interpretation. An abuse of vague legal concepts?

<p>The assumption of a new concept in interpretive processes undertaken since 1999 by the Supreme Court in its Constitutional Chamber Venezuela have been built in a sequence of criteria which, all constitutional judges must heed the call of the popular will as north hermeneutic in all areas of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Emilio J. Urbina Mendoza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de Deusto 2014-12-01
Series:Estudios de Deusto
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revista-estudios.revistas.deusto.es/article/view/356
id doaj-947f0bf2bc904d599bcc4568acfbc76a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-947f0bf2bc904d599bcc4568acfbc76a2020-11-25T01:54:56ZengUniversidad de DeustoEstudios de Deusto0423-48472386-90622014-12-0158236337510.18543/ed-58(2)-2010pp363-375310The influence of the people’s will in Constitutional Interpretation. An abuse of vague legal concepts?Emilio J. Urbina Mendoza0Universidad Católica Andrés Bello (Venezuela)<p>The assumption of a new concept in interpretive processes undertaken since 1999 by the Supreme Court in its Constitutional Chamber Venezuela have been built in a sequence of criteria which, all constitutional judges must heed the call of the popular will as north hermeneutic in all areas of legal knowledge. This popular constitutional interpretation has chased an alternative judicial discourse confronted with logic and the Western legal tradition, permeating categories and definitions little or nothing is set in the vocabulary or the theory of law. In 2007, with the failed constitutional reform, sought to impose as interpretive guideline popular supremacy. However, in the 48 presidential decree-laws, 2008, imposed the concept of “public interest” as the judge directed anchoring constitutional hermeneutic, and thus, warped the very essence of the concept called “vague legal concepts”.</p><p><strong><span>Published online</span></strong><span>: 05 December 2014</span></p>http://revista-estudios.revistas.deusto.es/article/view/356tribunal supremo de justicia/salaconstitucionalinterpretación constitucionalvoluntad popular
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emilio J. Urbina Mendoza
spellingShingle Emilio J. Urbina Mendoza
The influence of the people’s will in Constitutional Interpretation. An abuse of vague legal concepts?
Estudios de Deusto
tribunal supremo de justicia/salaconstitucional
interpretación constitucional
voluntad popular
author_facet Emilio J. Urbina Mendoza
author_sort Emilio J. Urbina Mendoza
title The influence of the people’s will in Constitutional Interpretation. An abuse of vague legal concepts?
title_short The influence of the people’s will in Constitutional Interpretation. An abuse of vague legal concepts?
title_full The influence of the people’s will in Constitutional Interpretation. An abuse of vague legal concepts?
title_fullStr The influence of the people’s will in Constitutional Interpretation. An abuse of vague legal concepts?
title_full_unstemmed The influence of the people’s will in Constitutional Interpretation. An abuse of vague legal concepts?
title_sort influence of the people’s will in constitutional interpretation. an abuse of vague legal concepts?
publisher Universidad de Deusto
series Estudios de Deusto
issn 0423-4847
2386-9062
publishDate 2014-12-01
description <p>The assumption of a new concept in interpretive processes undertaken since 1999 by the Supreme Court in its Constitutional Chamber Venezuela have been built in a sequence of criteria which, all constitutional judges must heed the call of the popular will as north hermeneutic in all areas of legal knowledge. This popular constitutional interpretation has chased an alternative judicial discourse confronted with logic and the Western legal tradition, permeating categories and definitions little or nothing is set in the vocabulary or the theory of law. In 2007, with the failed constitutional reform, sought to impose as interpretive guideline popular supremacy. However, in the 48 presidential decree-laws, 2008, imposed the concept of “public interest” as the judge directed anchoring constitutional hermeneutic, and thus, warped the very essence of the concept called “vague legal concepts”.</p><p><strong><span>Published online</span></strong><span>: 05 December 2014</span></p>
topic tribunal supremo de justicia/salaconstitucional
interpretación constitucional
voluntad popular
url http://revista-estudios.revistas.deusto.es/article/view/356
work_keys_str_mv AT emiliojurbinamendoza theinfluenceofthepeopleswillinconstitutionalinterpretationanabuseofvaguelegalconcepts
AT emiliojurbinamendoza influenceofthepeopleswillinconstitutionalinterpretationanabuseofvaguelegalconcepts
_version_ 1724986168010866688