Comparing Tactile to Auditory Guidance for Blind Individuals

The ability to travel independently is crucial to an individual’s quality of life but compromised by visual impairment. Several navigational aids have been developed for blind people to address this limitation. These devices typically employ auditory instructions to guide users to desired waypoints....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arnav Bharadwaj, Saurabh Bhaskar Shaw, Daniel Goldreich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00443/full
id doaj-9472dbe8c8b447d285ec6bce355c0074
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9472dbe8c8b447d285ec6bce355c00742020-11-25T02:11:21ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612019-12-011310.3389/fnhum.2019.00443482400Comparing Tactile to Auditory Guidance for Blind IndividualsArnav Bharadwaj0Saurabh Bhaskar Shaw1Daniel Goldreich2Daniel Goldreich3Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, CanadaMcMaster Neuroscience Graduate Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, CanadaDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, CanadaMcMaster Neuroscience Graduate Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, CanadaThe ability to travel independently is crucial to an individual’s quality of life but compromised by visual impairment. Several navigational aids have been developed for blind people to address this limitation. These devices typically employ auditory instructions to guide users to desired waypoints. Unfortunately, auditory instructions may interfere with users’ awareness of environmental sounds that signal dangers or provide cues for spatial orientation. Accordingly, there is a need to explore the use of non-auditory modalities to convey information for safe and independent travel. Here, we explored the efficacy of a tactile navigational aid that provides turn signals via vibrations on a hip-worn belt. We compared the performance of 12 blind participants as they navigated a series of paths under the direction of the tactile belt or conventional auditory turn commands; furthermore, we assessed the effect of repeated testing, both in the presence and absence of simulated street sounds. A computer-controlled system triggered each turn command, measured participants’ time-to-path-completion, and detected major navigational errors. When participants navigated in a silent environment, they performed somewhat worse with the tactile belt than the auditory device, taking longer to complete each trial and committing more errors. When participants navigated in the presence of simulated street noises, the difference in completion time between auditory and tactile navigation diminished. These results suggest that tactile navigation holds promise as an effective method in everyday environments characterized by ambient noise such as street sounds.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00443/fullvisual impairmentwaypointnavigationhapticvibrationblindness
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Arnav Bharadwaj
Saurabh Bhaskar Shaw
Daniel Goldreich
Daniel Goldreich
spellingShingle Arnav Bharadwaj
Saurabh Bhaskar Shaw
Daniel Goldreich
Daniel Goldreich
Comparing Tactile to Auditory Guidance for Blind Individuals
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
visual impairment
waypoint
navigation
haptic
vibration
blindness
author_facet Arnav Bharadwaj
Saurabh Bhaskar Shaw
Daniel Goldreich
Daniel Goldreich
author_sort Arnav Bharadwaj
title Comparing Tactile to Auditory Guidance for Blind Individuals
title_short Comparing Tactile to Auditory Guidance for Blind Individuals
title_full Comparing Tactile to Auditory Guidance for Blind Individuals
title_fullStr Comparing Tactile to Auditory Guidance for Blind Individuals
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Tactile to Auditory Guidance for Blind Individuals
title_sort comparing tactile to auditory guidance for blind individuals
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
issn 1662-5161
publishDate 2019-12-01
description The ability to travel independently is crucial to an individual’s quality of life but compromised by visual impairment. Several navigational aids have been developed for blind people to address this limitation. These devices typically employ auditory instructions to guide users to desired waypoints. Unfortunately, auditory instructions may interfere with users’ awareness of environmental sounds that signal dangers or provide cues for spatial orientation. Accordingly, there is a need to explore the use of non-auditory modalities to convey information for safe and independent travel. Here, we explored the efficacy of a tactile navigational aid that provides turn signals via vibrations on a hip-worn belt. We compared the performance of 12 blind participants as they navigated a series of paths under the direction of the tactile belt or conventional auditory turn commands; furthermore, we assessed the effect of repeated testing, both in the presence and absence of simulated street sounds. A computer-controlled system triggered each turn command, measured participants’ time-to-path-completion, and detected major navigational errors. When participants navigated in a silent environment, they performed somewhat worse with the tactile belt than the auditory device, taking longer to complete each trial and committing more errors. When participants navigated in the presence of simulated street noises, the difference in completion time between auditory and tactile navigation diminished. These results suggest that tactile navigation holds promise as an effective method in everyday environments characterized by ambient noise such as street sounds.
topic visual impairment
waypoint
navigation
haptic
vibration
blindness
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00443/full
work_keys_str_mv AT arnavbharadwaj comparingtactiletoauditoryguidanceforblindindividuals
AT saurabhbhaskarshaw comparingtactiletoauditoryguidanceforblindindividuals
AT danielgoldreich comparingtactiletoauditoryguidanceforblindindividuals
AT danielgoldreich comparingtactiletoauditoryguidanceforblindindividuals
_version_ 1724914790901481472