Comparison of Modern and Traditional Ways of Perceiving Information about Selected Cultural Heritage Objects

This paper maps out the possibilities of using virtual and augmented reality in the context of virtual museums and galleries. In addition to the many advantages that virtual reality offers in new knowledge acquisition and presentation of cultural heritage objects, we also describe some possible disa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Formanek Matúš, Filip Vladimír, Hnat Adam
Format: Article
Language:ces
Published: Sciendo 2020-03-01
Series:Slovenský Národopis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/se-2020-0003
id doaj-946fa9fc31fc47959ba55305bb24f5b9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-946fa9fc31fc47959ba55305bb24f5b92021-09-05T14:01:50ZcesSciendo Slovenský Národopis1339-93572020-03-01681476710.2478/se-2020-0003se-2020-0003Comparison of Modern and Traditional Ways of Perceiving Information about Selected Cultural Heritage ObjectsFormanek Matúš0Filip Vladimír1Hnat Adam2Katedra mediamatiky a kultúrneho dedičstva, Fakulta humanitných vied, Žilinská univerzita v Žiline, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 ŽilinaKatedra mediamatiky a kultúrneho dedičstva, Fakulta humanitných vied, Žilinská univerzita v Žiline, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 ŽilinaKatedra mediamatiky a kultúrneho dedičstva, Fakulta humanitných vied, Žilinská univerzita v Žiline, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26ŽilinaThis paper maps out the possibilities of using virtual and augmented reality in the context of virtual museums and galleries. In addition to the many advantages that virtual reality offers in new knowledge acquisition and presentation of cultural heritage objects, we also describe some possible disadvantages or problems directly related to this technology. Next, we try to find the answer to whether the presentation of selected objects of cultural heritage through virtual reality brings better results compared to the presentation in a traditional, museal form in the research part of the article. In conclusion, we summarise and present the results of the conducted research based on the statements of 138 students who participated in our testing.https://doi.org/10.2478/se-2020-0003virtual realityvirtual museumtraditional museumcomparison of presentation methods
collection DOAJ
language ces
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Formanek Matúš
Filip Vladimír
Hnat Adam
spellingShingle Formanek Matúš
Filip Vladimír
Hnat Adam
Comparison of Modern and Traditional Ways of Perceiving Information about Selected Cultural Heritage Objects
Slovenský Národopis
virtual reality
virtual museum
traditional museum
comparison of presentation methods
author_facet Formanek Matúš
Filip Vladimír
Hnat Adam
author_sort Formanek Matúš
title Comparison of Modern and Traditional Ways of Perceiving Information about Selected Cultural Heritage Objects
title_short Comparison of Modern and Traditional Ways of Perceiving Information about Selected Cultural Heritage Objects
title_full Comparison of Modern and Traditional Ways of Perceiving Information about Selected Cultural Heritage Objects
title_fullStr Comparison of Modern and Traditional Ways of Perceiving Information about Selected Cultural Heritage Objects
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Modern and Traditional Ways of Perceiving Information about Selected Cultural Heritage Objects
title_sort comparison of modern and traditional ways of perceiving information about selected cultural heritage objects
publisher Sciendo
series Slovenský Národopis
issn 1339-9357
publishDate 2020-03-01
description This paper maps out the possibilities of using virtual and augmented reality in the context of virtual museums and galleries. In addition to the many advantages that virtual reality offers in new knowledge acquisition and presentation of cultural heritage objects, we also describe some possible disadvantages or problems directly related to this technology. Next, we try to find the answer to whether the presentation of selected objects of cultural heritage through virtual reality brings better results compared to the presentation in a traditional, museal form in the research part of the article. In conclusion, we summarise and present the results of the conducted research based on the statements of 138 students who participated in our testing.
topic virtual reality
virtual museum
traditional museum
comparison of presentation methods
url https://doi.org/10.2478/se-2020-0003
work_keys_str_mv AT formanekmatus comparisonofmodernandtraditionalwaysofperceivinginformationaboutselectedculturalheritageobjects
AT filipvladimir comparisonofmodernandtraditionalwaysofperceivinginformationaboutselectedculturalheritageobjects
AT hnatadam comparisonofmodernandtraditionalwaysofperceivinginformationaboutselectedculturalheritageobjects
_version_ 1717809512208924672