Comparison of Modern and Traditional Ways of Perceiving Information about Selected Cultural Heritage Objects
This paper maps out the possibilities of using virtual and augmented reality in the context of virtual museums and galleries. In addition to the many advantages that virtual reality offers in new knowledge acquisition and presentation of cultural heritage objects, we also describe some possible disa...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | ces |
Published: |
Sciendo
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Slovenský Národopis |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/se-2020-0003 |
id |
doaj-946fa9fc31fc47959ba55305bb24f5b9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-946fa9fc31fc47959ba55305bb24f5b92021-09-05T14:01:50ZcesSciendo Slovenský Národopis1339-93572020-03-01681476710.2478/se-2020-0003se-2020-0003Comparison of Modern and Traditional Ways of Perceiving Information about Selected Cultural Heritage ObjectsFormanek Matúš0Filip Vladimír1Hnat Adam2Katedra mediamatiky a kultúrneho dedičstva, Fakulta humanitných vied, Žilinská univerzita v Žiline, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 ŽilinaKatedra mediamatiky a kultúrneho dedičstva, Fakulta humanitných vied, Žilinská univerzita v Žiline, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 ŽilinaKatedra mediamatiky a kultúrneho dedičstva, Fakulta humanitných vied, Žilinská univerzita v Žiline, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26ŽilinaThis paper maps out the possibilities of using virtual and augmented reality in the context of virtual museums and galleries. In addition to the many advantages that virtual reality offers in new knowledge acquisition and presentation of cultural heritage objects, we also describe some possible disadvantages or problems directly related to this technology. Next, we try to find the answer to whether the presentation of selected objects of cultural heritage through virtual reality brings better results compared to the presentation in a traditional, museal form in the research part of the article. In conclusion, we summarise and present the results of the conducted research based on the statements of 138 students who participated in our testing.https://doi.org/10.2478/se-2020-0003virtual realityvirtual museumtraditional museumcomparison of presentation methods |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
ces |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Formanek Matúš Filip Vladimír Hnat Adam |
spellingShingle |
Formanek Matúš Filip Vladimír Hnat Adam Comparison of Modern and Traditional Ways of Perceiving Information about Selected Cultural Heritage Objects Slovenský Národopis virtual reality virtual museum traditional museum comparison of presentation methods |
author_facet |
Formanek Matúš Filip Vladimír Hnat Adam |
author_sort |
Formanek Matúš |
title |
Comparison of Modern and Traditional Ways of Perceiving Information about Selected Cultural Heritage Objects |
title_short |
Comparison of Modern and Traditional Ways of Perceiving Information about Selected Cultural Heritage Objects |
title_full |
Comparison of Modern and Traditional Ways of Perceiving Information about Selected Cultural Heritage Objects |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of Modern and Traditional Ways of Perceiving Information about Selected Cultural Heritage Objects |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of Modern and Traditional Ways of Perceiving Information about Selected Cultural Heritage Objects |
title_sort |
comparison of modern and traditional ways of perceiving information about selected cultural heritage objects |
publisher |
Sciendo |
series |
Slovenský Národopis |
issn |
1339-9357 |
publishDate |
2020-03-01 |
description |
This paper maps out the possibilities of using virtual and augmented reality in the context of virtual museums and galleries. In addition to the many advantages that virtual reality offers in new knowledge acquisition and presentation of cultural heritage objects, we also describe some possible disadvantages or problems directly related to this technology. Next, we try to find the answer to whether the presentation of selected objects of cultural heritage through virtual reality brings better results compared to the presentation in a traditional, museal form in the research part of the article. In conclusion, we summarise and present the results of the conducted research based on the statements of 138 students who participated in our testing. |
topic |
virtual reality virtual museum traditional museum comparison of presentation methods |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2478/se-2020-0003 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT formanekmatus comparisonofmodernandtraditionalwaysofperceivinginformationaboutselectedculturalheritageobjects AT filipvladimir comparisonofmodernandtraditionalwaysofperceivinginformationaboutselectedculturalheritageobjects AT hnatadam comparisonofmodernandtraditionalwaysofperceivinginformationaboutselectedculturalheritageobjects |
_version_ |
1717809512208924672 |