Using argumentation theory to identify the challenges of shared decision-making when the doctor and the patient have a difference of opinion
This paper aims to identify the challenges in the implementation of shared decision-making (SDM) when the doctor and the patient have a difference of opinion. It analyses the preconditions of the resolution of this difference of opinion by using an analytical and normative framework known in the fie...
Main Authors: | Claudia A. Zanini, Sara Rubinelli |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PAGEPress Publications
2012-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Public Health Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jphres.org/index.php/jphres/article/view/59 |
Similar Items
-
Reflecting on shared decision making: A reflection‐quantification study
by: Marleen Kunneman, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01) -
Experiences of shared decision-making in community rehabilitation: a focused ethnography
by: Kiran Pohar Manhas, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
Patient Engagement in Health and Well-Being: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives in Patient Centered Medicine
Published: (2018) -
Could shared decision making affect staying in hospital? A cross-sectional pilot study
by: M. R. Gualano, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01) -
Challenges to patient centredness – a comparison of patient and doctor experiences from primary care
by: Helene Bodegård, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01)