La sociologie, discipline experte des controverses environnementales ?

Engaging a discussion between literature and case studies, this article aims to wonder how sociology can take ownership of environmental issues, while social demands for expertise, formulation of standards and inter-disciplinarity have never been stronger. Such expectations are even more specific in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anahita Grisoni, Sophie Némoz
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Éditions en environnement VertigO 2013-10-01
Series:VertigO
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/14157
id doaj-94660a77ed554e7bbdfd491fa3814b23
record_format Article
spelling doaj-94660a77ed554e7bbdfd491fa3814b232021-09-02T16:02:25ZfraÉditions en environnement VertigOVertigO1492-84422013-10-0113210.4000/vertigo.14157La sociologie, discipline experte des controverses environnementales ?Anahita GrisoniSophie NémozEngaging a discussion between literature and case studies, this article aims to wonder how sociology can take ownership of environmental issues, while social demands for expertise, formulation of standards and inter-disciplinarity have never been stronger. Such expectations are even more specific in the context of environmental controversies. Sociology takes part in the constitution of the field of “environmental sciences” and is therefore, anchored between the two postures of expertise and commitment. The professional experiences of the two authors are at the heart of this reflection. Both in the teaching of sociology and in the participation in research projects, involving other scientific disciplines, knowledge production and sharing can be limited by the partial impossibility to lead a scientific protocol. Is it necessary to give up for all that the idea of inter-disciplinarity between various scientific fields? Is it necessary to put aside the implication of the sociologist in concrete projects, based on an expertise founded on a fundamental research? In the third part of this article, the posture of the committed sociologist - scholarship with commitment (Bourdieu, 2002) – will be revisited not only from the analysis of several situations of research, but also from various experiences in professional structures, in which the sociologist was invited to propose measures serving as basis for action.http://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/14157sociologyenvironnemental controversiesexpertiseinter-disciplinaritycommitmentdistancing
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anahita Grisoni
Sophie Némoz
spellingShingle Anahita Grisoni
Sophie Némoz
La sociologie, discipline experte des controverses environnementales ?
VertigO
sociology
environnemental controversies
expertise
inter-disciplinarity
commitment
distancing
author_facet Anahita Grisoni
Sophie Némoz
author_sort Anahita Grisoni
title La sociologie, discipline experte des controverses environnementales ?
title_short La sociologie, discipline experte des controverses environnementales ?
title_full La sociologie, discipline experte des controverses environnementales ?
title_fullStr La sociologie, discipline experte des controverses environnementales ?
title_full_unstemmed La sociologie, discipline experte des controverses environnementales ?
title_sort la sociologie, discipline experte des controverses environnementales ?
publisher Éditions en environnement VertigO
series VertigO
issn 1492-8442
publishDate 2013-10-01
description Engaging a discussion between literature and case studies, this article aims to wonder how sociology can take ownership of environmental issues, while social demands for expertise, formulation of standards and inter-disciplinarity have never been stronger. Such expectations are even more specific in the context of environmental controversies. Sociology takes part in the constitution of the field of “environmental sciences” and is therefore, anchored between the two postures of expertise and commitment. The professional experiences of the two authors are at the heart of this reflection. Both in the teaching of sociology and in the participation in research projects, involving other scientific disciplines, knowledge production and sharing can be limited by the partial impossibility to lead a scientific protocol. Is it necessary to give up for all that the idea of inter-disciplinarity between various scientific fields? Is it necessary to put aside the implication of the sociologist in concrete projects, based on an expertise founded on a fundamental research? In the third part of this article, the posture of the committed sociologist - scholarship with commitment (Bourdieu, 2002) – will be revisited not only from the analysis of several situations of research, but also from various experiences in professional structures, in which the sociologist was invited to propose measures serving as basis for action.
topic sociology
environnemental controversies
expertise
inter-disciplinarity
commitment
distancing
url http://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/14157
work_keys_str_mv AT anahitagrisoni lasociologiedisciplineexpertedescontroversesenvironnementales
AT sophienemoz lasociologiedisciplineexpertedescontroversesenvironnementales
_version_ 1721173128424456192