To the question of secondary linguistic person: communicator, interpreter, or author?
In the Postmodern culture, the text gets the status of a «subject», and the linguistic person becomes a means of implementing narrative in some given discourse and, as such, he breaks down into three types: a communicator, an interpreter, a creator. As a result, the authors come to the conclusion...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Omsk State Technical University, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education
2018-06-01
|
| Series: | Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность" |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2018/2%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/78-82%20%D0%9F%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%83%D1%85%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%20%D0%95.%20%D0%92.,%20%D0%A6%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%83%D1%85%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0%20%D0%95.%20%D0%90..pdf |
| Summary: | In the Postmodern culture, the text gets the status of a «subject», and the linguistic
person becomes a means of implementing narrative in some given discourse and,
as such, he breaks down into three types: a communicator, an interpreter, a creator.
As a result, the authors come to the conclusion that the authentic linguistic person,
who takes a role the active subject of communication, is the person and creator
realizing his self in creativity |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2542-0488 2541-7983 |