Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review
Background. Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is a surgically implanted treatment option for refractory gastroparesis. Aim. To systematically appraise the current evidence for the use of gastric electrical stimulation and suggest a method of standardisation of assessment and follow-up in these pa...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Gastroenterology Research and Practice |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/762972 |
id |
doaj-943b673e14a849b28b337a13c572bd9f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-943b673e14a849b28b337a13c572bd9f2020-11-25T00:20:30ZengHindawi LimitedGastroenterology Research and Practice1687-61211687-630X2015-01-01201510.1155/2015/762972762972Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic ReviewNikhil Lal0Sam Livemore1Declan Dunne2Iftikhar Khan3School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE, UKSchool of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE, UKAintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool L9 7AL, UKAintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool L9 7AL, UKBackground. Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is a surgically implanted treatment option for refractory gastroparesis. Aim. To systematically appraise the current evidence for the use of gastric electrical stimulation and suggest a method of standardisation of assessment and follow-up in these patients. Methods. A systematic review of PubMed, Web of Science, DISCOVER, and Cochrane Library was conducted using the keywords including gastric electrical stimulation, gastroparesis, nausea, and vomiting and neuromodulation, stomach, central nervous system, gastric pacing, electrical stimulation, and gastrointestinal. Results. 1139 potentially relevant articles were identified, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria and were included. The quality of studies was variable. There was a variation in outcome measures and follow-up methodology. Included studies suggested significant reductions in symptom severity reporting over the study period, but improvements in gastric emptying time were variable and rarely correlated with symptom improvement. Conclusion. The evidence in support of gastric electrical stimulation is limited and heterogeneous in quality. While current evidence has shown a degree of efficacy in these patients, high-quality, large clinical trials are needed to establish the efficacy of this therapy and to identify the patients for whom this therapy is inappropriate. A consensus view on essential preoperative assessment and postoperative measurement is needed.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/762972 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nikhil Lal Sam Livemore Declan Dunne Iftikhar Khan |
spellingShingle |
Nikhil Lal Sam Livemore Declan Dunne Iftikhar Khan Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review Gastroenterology Research and Practice |
author_facet |
Nikhil Lal Sam Livemore Declan Dunne Iftikhar Khan |
author_sort |
Nikhil Lal |
title |
Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review |
title_short |
Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review |
title_full |
Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr |
Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review |
title_sort |
gastric electrical stimulation with the enterra system: a systematic review |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Gastroenterology Research and Practice |
issn |
1687-6121 1687-630X |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
Background. Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is a surgically implanted treatment option for refractory gastroparesis. Aim. To systematically appraise the current evidence for the use of gastric electrical stimulation and suggest a method of standardisation of assessment and follow-up in these patients. Methods. A systematic review of PubMed, Web of Science, DISCOVER, and Cochrane Library was conducted using the keywords including gastric electrical stimulation, gastroparesis, nausea, and vomiting and neuromodulation, stomach, central nervous system, gastric pacing, electrical stimulation, and gastrointestinal. Results. 1139 potentially relevant articles were identified, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria and were included. The quality of studies was variable. There was a variation in outcome measures and follow-up methodology. Included studies suggested significant reductions in symptom severity reporting over the study period, but improvements in gastric emptying time were variable and rarely correlated with symptom improvement. Conclusion. The evidence in support of gastric electrical stimulation is limited and heterogeneous in quality. While current evidence has shown a degree of efficacy in these patients, high-quality, large clinical trials are needed to establish the efficacy of this therapy and to identify the patients for whom this therapy is inappropriate. A consensus view on essential preoperative assessment and postoperative measurement is needed. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/762972 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nikhillal gastricelectricalstimulationwiththeenterrasystemasystematicreview AT samlivemore gastricelectricalstimulationwiththeenterrasystemasystematicreview AT declandunne gastricelectricalstimulationwiththeenterrasystemasystematicreview AT iftikharkhan gastricelectricalstimulationwiththeenterrasystemasystematicreview |
_version_ |
1725367225331744768 |