Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review

Background. Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is a surgically implanted treatment option for refractory gastroparesis. Aim. To systematically appraise the current evidence for the use of gastric electrical stimulation and suggest a method of standardisation of assessment and follow-up in these pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nikhil Lal, Sam Livemore, Declan Dunne, Iftikhar Khan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/762972
id doaj-943b673e14a849b28b337a13c572bd9f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-943b673e14a849b28b337a13c572bd9f2020-11-25T00:20:30ZengHindawi LimitedGastroenterology Research and Practice1687-61211687-630X2015-01-01201510.1155/2015/762972762972Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic ReviewNikhil Lal0Sam Livemore1Declan Dunne2Iftikhar Khan3School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE, UKSchool of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE, UKAintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool L9 7AL, UKAintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool L9 7AL, UKBackground. Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is a surgically implanted treatment option for refractory gastroparesis. Aim. To systematically appraise the current evidence for the use of gastric electrical stimulation and suggest a method of standardisation of assessment and follow-up in these patients. Methods. A systematic review of PubMed, Web of Science, DISCOVER, and Cochrane Library was conducted using the keywords including gastric electrical stimulation, gastroparesis, nausea, and vomiting and neuromodulation, stomach, central nervous system, gastric pacing, electrical stimulation, and gastrointestinal. Results. 1139 potentially relevant articles were identified, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria and were included. The quality of studies was variable. There was a variation in outcome measures and follow-up methodology. Included studies suggested significant reductions in symptom severity reporting over the study period, but improvements in gastric emptying time were variable and rarely correlated with symptom improvement. Conclusion. The evidence in support of gastric electrical stimulation is limited and heterogeneous in quality. While current evidence has shown a degree of efficacy in these patients, high-quality, large clinical trials are needed to establish the efficacy of this therapy and to identify the patients for whom this therapy is inappropriate. A consensus view on essential preoperative assessment and postoperative measurement is needed.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/762972
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nikhil Lal
Sam Livemore
Declan Dunne
Iftikhar Khan
spellingShingle Nikhil Lal
Sam Livemore
Declan Dunne
Iftikhar Khan
Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
author_facet Nikhil Lal
Sam Livemore
Declan Dunne
Iftikhar Khan
author_sort Nikhil Lal
title Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review
title_short Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review
title_full Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review
title_sort gastric electrical stimulation with the enterra system: a systematic review
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Gastroenterology Research and Practice
issn 1687-6121
1687-630X
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Background. Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is a surgically implanted treatment option for refractory gastroparesis. Aim. To systematically appraise the current evidence for the use of gastric electrical stimulation and suggest a method of standardisation of assessment and follow-up in these patients. Methods. A systematic review of PubMed, Web of Science, DISCOVER, and Cochrane Library was conducted using the keywords including gastric electrical stimulation, gastroparesis, nausea, and vomiting and neuromodulation, stomach, central nervous system, gastric pacing, electrical stimulation, and gastrointestinal. Results. 1139 potentially relevant articles were identified, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria and were included. The quality of studies was variable. There was a variation in outcome measures and follow-up methodology. Included studies suggested significant reductions in symptom severity reporting over the study period, but improvements in gastric emptying time were variable and rarely correlated with symptom improvement. Conclusion. The evidence in support of gastric electrical stimulation is limited and heterogeneous in quality. While current evidence has shown a degree of efficacy in these patients, high-quality, large clinical trials are needed to establish the efficacy of this therapy and to identify the patients for whom this therapy is inappropriate. A consensus view on essential preoperative assessment and postoperative measurement is needed.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/762972
work_keys_str_mv AT nikhillal gastricelectricalstimulationwiththeenterrasystemasystematicreview
AT samlivemore gastricelectricalstimulationwiththeenterrasystemasystematicreview
AT declandunne gastricelectricalstimulationwiththeenterrasystemasystematicreview
AT iftikharkhan gastricelectricalstimulationwiththeenterrasystemasystematicreview
_version_ 1725367225331744768