Situational Factors Influencing Receptivity to Bullshit
Individuals are motivated to maintain a sense of meaning, and enact cognitive processes to do so (e.g., perceiving structure in the environment). This motivation to find meaning may ultimately impact humans’ interpretation of "bullshit", statements intended to con...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PsychOpen
2019-11-01
|
Series: | Social Psychological Bulletin |
Online Access: | https://spb.psychopen.eu/article/37393/download/pdf/ |
id |
doaj-94327b400a284fa2b3651655ddbe7ec7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-94327b400a284fa2b3651655ddbe7ec72020-11-25T03:26:30ZengPsychOpenSocial Psychological Bulletin1896-18002569-653X2019-11-0114312410.32872/spb.v14i3.3739337393Situational Factors Influencing Receptivity to BullshitMitch Brown0Lucas A. Keefer1Shelby J. McGrew2Fairleigh Dickinson UniversityUniversity of Southern MississippiSoutheast Louisiana Veteran's Health Care System Individuals are motivated to maintain a sense of meaning, and enact cognitive processes to do so (e.g., perceiving structure in the environment). This motivation to find meaning may ultimately impact humans’ interpretation of "bullshit", statements intended to convey profundity without any meaning. Conversely, subtle cues threatening the meaningfulness of bullshit may elicit greater skepticism. Three studies tested situational factors predicted to heighten or diminish susceptibility to bullshit by changing motivations to seek meaning. We employed diverse methods including symbolic meaning threat (Study 1), social exclusion (Cyberball; Study 2), and manipulating cognitive fluency (Study 3). Taken together, the results indicate basic processes shaping the detection of meaning have implications for the appraisal of ambiguously insightful information. https://spb.psychopen.eu/article/37393/download/pdf/ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mitch Brown Lucas A. Keefer Shelby J. McGrew |
spellingShingle |
Mitch Brown Lucas A. Keefer Shelby J. McGrew Situational Factors Influencing Receptivity to Bullshit Social Psychological Bulletin |
author_facet |
Mitch Brown Lucas A. Keefer Shelby J. McGrew |
author_sort |
Mitch Brown |
title |
Situational Factors Influencing Receptivity to Bullshit |
title_short |
Situational Factors Influencing Receptivity to Bullshit |
title_full |
Situational Factors Influencing Receptivity to Bullshit |
title_fullStr |
Situational Factors Influencing Receptivity to Bullshit |
title_full_unstemmed |
Situational Factors Influencing Receptivity to Bullshit |
title_sort |
situational factors influencing receptivity to bullshit |
publisher |
PsychOpen |
series |
Social Psychological Bulletin |
issn |
1896-1800 2569-653X |
publishDate |
2019-11-01 |
description |
Individuals are motivated to maintain a sense of meaning, and enact cognitive processes to do so (e.g., perceiving structure in the environment). This motivation to find meaning may ultimately impact humans’ interpretation of "bullshit", statements intended to convey profundity without any meaning. Conversely, subtle cues threatening the meaningfulness of bullshit may elicit greater skepticism. Three studies tested situational factors predicted to heighten or diminish susceptibility to bullshit by changing motivations to seek meaning. We employed diverse methods including symbolic meaning threat (Study 1), social exclusion (Cyberball; Study 2), and manipulating cognitive fluency (Study 3). Taken together, the results indicate basic processes shaping the detection of meaning have implications for the appraisal of ambiguously insightful information.
|
url |
https://spb.psychopen.eu/article/37393/download/pdf/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mitchbrown situationalfactorsinfluencingreceptivitytobullshit AT lucasakeefer situationalfactorsinfluencingreceptivitytobullshit AT shelbyjmcgrew situationalfactorsinfluencingreceptivitytobullshit |
_version_ |
1724592332967247872 |