Anti-legal Ideology of Extremism

The paper considers the extremist ideology as anti-legal activity and presents the study of scientific views on ideology as an element of extremist activity. The Article 30 of the Constitution of the Republic of Tajikistan prohibits any campaigning and propaganda provoking social, national, racial,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abdullaev Nozim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:SHS Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185001228
Description
Summary:The paper considers the extremist ideology as anti-legal activity and presents the study of scientific views on ideology as an element of extremist activity. The Article 30 of the Constitution of the Republic of Tajikistan prohibits any campaigning and propaganda provoking social, national, racial, religious hostility and hatred. The problem of criminal law standards on extremist activity includes lack of uniform approaches to extremism ideology in the Republic of Tajikistan and regarding some issues of applying such standards. In practice, this raises questions concerning differentiation of ideology, which makes it difficult to qualify extremist crimes. The analysis of anti-extremism legislation of the Republic of Tajikistan revealed some disadvantages and the authors proposed to introduce certain changes and amendments to close the gaps in the legislation in this respect.
ISSN:2261-2424