A Meta-analysis of Gender Interaction on the Effectiveness of Cooperative and Group Discussion Methods
The population of this meta-analysis were the available related studies done between 1370-1392 in the country, including full-text articles, theses and research projects in the databases and libraries, universities or government agencies. Based on the inclusion exclusion criteria as well as sensitiv...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch
2016-05-01
|
Series: | آموزش و ارزشیابی |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://jinev.iaut.ac.ir/article_523055_bfe77cde92c721b6b60663f52d5862f5.pdf |
id |
doaj-941691bcc54743a09c50f672dcaf9b41 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-941691bcc54743a09c50f672dcaf9b412020-11-24T21:03:12ZfasIslamic Azad University, Tabriz Branchآموزش و ارزشیابی2345-62992476-56272016-05-0193383103523055A Meta-analysis of Gender Interaction on the Effectiveness of Cooperative and Group Discussion MethodsAyoub Feyzi0Javad Mesr Abadi1کارشناسی ارشد تحقیقات آموزشیدانشیار روانشناسی تربیتی دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجانThe population of this meta-analysis were the available related studies done between 1370-1392 in the country, including full-text articles, theses and research projects in the databases and libraries, universities or government agencies. Based on the inclusion exclusion criteria as well as sensitivity analysis, almost 323 effect size from about researches were investigated. The results of the combined effects of gender differences on the effectiveness of cooperative and discussion methods in random model for girls and boys was 0.665 and 0.589, respectively, which were both statistically significant effect sizes. Based on Cohen's criteria, we can say that the effectiveness of these methods for male and female students is average and desirable. Also, the independent t-test results showed that there is no statistically significant difference between the effect size means of boys and girls although the effect size for girls was greater. So, as suggested by the theoretical foundations of these teaching methods, these methods are not limited to a particular ability level or sex but all who are engaged in can benefit from these methodshttp://jinev.iaut.ac.ir/article_523055_bfe77cde92c721b6b60663f52d5862f5.pdfmeta-analysiscooperative learninggroup discussiongender |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
fas |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ayoub Feyzi Javad Mesr Abadi |
spellingShingle |
Ayoub Feyzi Javad Mesr Abadi A Meta-analysis of Gender Interaction on the Effectiveness of Cooperative and Group Discussion Methods آموزش و ارزشیابی meta-analysis cooperative learning group discussion gender |
author_facet |
Ayoub Feyzi Javad Mesr Abadi |
author_sort |
Ayoub Feyzi |
title |
A Meta-analysis of Gender Interaction on the Effectiveness of Cooperative and Group Discussion Methods |
title_short |
A Meta-analysis of Gender Interaction on the Effectiveness of Cooperative and Group Discussion Methods |
title_full |
A Meta-analysis of Gender Interaction on the Effectiveness of Cooperative and Group Discussion Methods |
title_fullStr |
A Meta-analysis of Gender Interaction on the Effectiveness of Cooperative and Group Discussion Methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Meta-analysis of Gender Interaction on the Effectiveness of Cooperative and Group Discussion Methods |
title_sort |
meta-analysis of gender interaction on the effectiveness of cooperative and group discussion methods |
publisher |
Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch |
series |
آموزش و ارزشیابی |
issn |
2345-6299 2476-5627 |
publishDate |
2016-05-01 |
description |
The population of this meta-analysis were the available related studies done between 1370-1392 in the country, including full-text articles, theses and research projects in the databases and libraries, universities or government agencies. Based on the inclusion exclusion criteria as well as sensitivity analysis, almost 323 effect size from about researches were investigated. The results of the combined effects of gender differences on the effectiveness of cooperative and discussion methods in random model for girls and boys was 0.665 and 0.589, respectively, which were both statistically significant effect sizes. Based on Cohen's criteria, we can say that the effectiveness of these methods for male and female students is average and desirable. Also, the independent t-test results showed that there is no statistically significant difference between the effect size means of boys and girls although the effect size for girls was greater. So, as suggested by the theoretical foundations of these teaching methods, these methods are not limited to a particular ability level or sex but all who are engaged in can benefit from these methods |
topic |
meta-analysis cooperative learning group discussion gender |
url |
http://jinev.iaut.ac.ir/article_523055_bfe77cde92c721b6b60663f52d5862f5.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ayoubfeyzi ametaanalysisofgenderinteractionontheeffectivenessofcooperativeandgroupdiscussionmethods AT javadmesrabadi ametaanalysisofgenderinteractionontheeffectivenessofcooperativeandgroupdiscussionmethods AT ayoubfeyzi metaanalysisofgenderinteractionontheeffectivenessofcooperativeandgroupdiscussionmethods AT javadmesrabadi metaanalysisofgenderinteractionontheeffectivenessofcooperativeandgroupdiscussionmethods |
_version_ |
1716773763590127616 |