A Meta-analysis of Gender Interaction on the Effectiveness of Cooperative and Group Discussion Methods

The population of this meta-analysis were the available related studies done between 1370-1392 in the country, including full-text articles, theses and research projects in the databases and libraries, universities or government agencies. Based on the inclusion exclusion criteria as well as sensitiv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ayoub Feyzi, Javad Mesr Abadi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch 2016-05-01
Series:آموزش و ارزشیابی
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jinev.iaut.ac.ir/article_523055_bfe77cde92c721b6b60663f52d5862f5.pdf
id doaj-941691bcc54743a09c50f672dcaf9b41
record_format Article
spelling doaj-941691bcc54743a09c50f672dcaf9b412020-11-24T21:03:12ZfasIslamic Azad University, Tabriz Branchآموزش و ارزشیابی2345-62992476-56272016-05-0193383103523055A Meta-analysis of Gender Interaction on the Effectiveness of Cooperative and Group Discussion MethodsAyoub Feyzi0Javad Mesr Abadi1کارشناسی ارشد تحقیقات آموزشیدانشیار روانشناسی تربیتی دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجانThe population of this meta-analysis were the available related studies done between 1370-1392 in the country, including full-text articles, theses and research projects in the databases and libraries, universities or government agencies. Based on the inclusion exclusion criteria as well as sensitivity analysis, almost 323 effect size from about researches were investigated. The results of the combined effects of gender differences on the effectiveness of cooperative and discussion methods in random model for girls and boys was 0.665 and 0.589, respectively, which were both statistically significant effect sizes. Based on Cohen's criteria, we can say that the effectiveness of these methods for male and female students is average and desirable. Also, the independent t-test results showed that there is no statistically significant difference between the effect size means of boys and girls although the effect size for girls was greater. So, as suggested by the theoretical foundations of these teaching methods, these methods are not limited to a particular ability level or sex but all who are engaged in can benefit from these methodshttp://jinev.iaut.ac.ir/article_523055_bfe77cde92c721b6b60663f52d5862f5.pdfmeta-analysiscooperative learninggroup discussiongender
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ayoub Feyzi
Javad Mesr Abadi
spellingShingle Ayoub Feyzi
Javad Mesr Abadi
A Meta-analysis of Gender Interaction on the Effectiveness of Cooperative and Group Discussion Methods
آموزش و ارزشیابی
meta-analysis
cooperative learning
group discussion
gender
author_facet Ayoub Feyzi
Javad Mesr Abadi
author_sort Ayoub Feyzi
title A Meta-analysis of Gender Interaction on the Effectiveness of Cooperative and Group Discussion Methods
title_short A Meta-analysis of Gender Interaction on the Effectiveness of Cooperative and Group Discussion Methods
title_full A Meta-analysis of Gender Interaction on the Effectiveness of Cooperative and Group Discussion Methods
title_fullStr A Meta-analysis of Gender Interaction on the Effectiveness of Cooperative and Group Discussion Methods
title_full_unstemmed A Meta-analysis of Gender Interaction on the Effectiveness of Cooperative and Group Discussion Methods
title_sort meta-analysis of gender interaction on the effectiveness of cooperative and group discussion methods
publisher Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch
series آموزش و ارزشیابی
issn 2345-6299
2476-5627
publishDate 2016-05-01
description The population of this meta-analysis were the available related studies done between 1370-1392 in the country, including full-text articles, theses and research projects in the databases and libraries, universities or government agencies. Based on the inclusion exclusion criteria as well as sensitivity analysis, almost 323 effect size from about researches were investigated. The results of the combined effects of gender differences on the effectiveness of cooperative and discussion methods in random model for girls and boys was 0.665 and 0.589, respectively, which were both statistically significant effect sizes. Based on Cohen's criteria, we can say that the effectiveness of these methods for male and female students is average and desirable. Also, the independent t-test results showed that there is no statistically significant difference between the effect size means of boys and girls although the effect size for girls was greater. So, as suggested by the theoretical foundations of these teaching methods, these methods are not limited to a particular ability level or sex but all who are engaged in can benefit from these methods
topic meta-analysis
cooperative learning
group discussion
gender
url http://jinev.iaut.ac.ir/article_523055_bfe77cde92c721b6b60663f52d5862f5.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ayoubfeyzi ametaanalysisofgenderinteractionontheeffectivenessofcooperativeandgroupdiscussionmethods
AT javadmesrabadi ametaanalysisofgenderinteractionontheeffectivenessofcooperativeandgroupdiscussionmethods
AT ayoubfeyzi metaanalysisofgenderinteractionontheeffectivenessofcooperativeandgroupdiscussionmethods
AT javadmesrabadi metaanalysisofgenderinteractionontheeffectivenessofcooperativeandgroupdiscussionmethods
_version_ 1716773763590127616