A synergistic antiproliferation effect of curcumin and docosahexaenoic acid in SK-BR-3 breast cancer cells: unique signaling not explained by the effects of either compound alone
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Breast cancer is a collection of diseases in which molecular phenotypes can act as both indicators and mediators of therapeutic strategy. Therefore, candidate therapeutics must be assessed in the context of multiple cell lines with k...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2011-04-01
|
Series: | BMC Cancer |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/11/149 |
id |
doaj-940d09b73237492d96c52a0ff391dd9f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-940d09b73237492d96c52a0ff391dd9f2020-11-24T22:09:08ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072011-04-0111114910.1186/1471-2407-11-149A synergistic antiproliferation effect of curcumin and docosahexaenoic acid in SK-BR-3 breast cancer cells: unique signaling not explained by the effects of either compound aloneJo Davisson VXu ZhidongVanHorn Justin FHarvey Kevin ATerry ColinBieberich Andrew AAltenburg Jeffrey DSiddiqui Rafat A<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Breast cancer is a collection of diseases in which molecular phenotypes can act as both indicators and mediators of therapeutic strategy. Therefore, candidate therapeutics must be assessed in the context of multiple cell lines with known molecular phenotypes. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and curcumin (CCM) are dietary compounds known to antagonize breast cancer cell proliferation. We report that these compounds in combination exert a variable antiproliferative effect across multiple breast cell lines, which is synergistic in SK-BR-3 cells and triggers cell signaling events not predicted by the activity of either compound alone.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Dose response curves for CCM and DHA were generated for five breast cell lines. Effects of the DHA+ CCM combination on cell proliferation were evaluated using varying concentrations, at a fixed ratio, of CCM and DHA based on their individual ED<sub>50</sub>. Detection of synergy was performed using nonlinear regression of a sigmoid dose response model and Combination Index approaches. Cell molecular network responses were investigated through whole genome microarray analysis of transcript level changes. Gene expression results were validated by RT-PCR, and western blot analysis was performed for potential signaling mediators. Cellular curcumin uptake, with and without DHA, was analyzed via flow cytometry and HPLC.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>CCM+DHA had an antiproliferative effect in SK-BR-3, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-361, MCF7 and MCF10AT cells. The effect was synergistic for SK-BR-3 (ER<sup>- </sup>PR<sup>- </sup>Her2<sup>+</sup>) relative to the two compounds individually. A whole genome microarray approach was used to investigate changes in gene expression for the synergistic effects of CCM+DHA in SK-BR-3 cells lines. CCM+DHA triggered transcript-level responses, in disease-relevant functional categories, that were largely non-overlapping with changes caused by CCM or DHA individually. Genes involved in cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, inhibition of metastasis, and cell adhesion were upregulated, whereas genes involved in cancer development and progression, metastasis, and cell cycle progression were downregulated. Cellular pools of PPARγ and phospho-p53 were increased by CCM+DHA relative to either compound alone. DHA enhanced cellular uptake of CCM in SK-BR-3 cells without significantly enhancing CCM uptake in other cell lines.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The combination of DHA and CCM is potentially a dietary supplemental treatment for some breast cancers, likely dependent upon molecular phenotype. DHA enhancement of cellular curcumin uptake is one potential mechanism for observed synergy in SK-BR-3 cells; however, transcriptomic data show that the antiproliferation synergy accompanies many signaling events unique to the combined presence of the two compounds.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/11/149 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jo Davisson V Xu Zhidong VanHorn Justin F Harvey Kevin A Terry Colin Bieberich Andrew A Altenburg Jeffrey D Siddiqui Rafat A |
spellingShingle |
Jo Davisson V Xu Zhidong VanHorn Justin F Harvey Kevin A Terry Colin Bieberich Andrew A Altenburg Jeffrey D Siddiqui Rafat A A synergistic antiproliferation effect of curcumin and docosahexaenoic acid in SK-BR-3 breast cancer cells: unique signaling not explained by the effects of either compound alone BMC Cancer |
author_facet |
Jo Davisson V Xu Zhidong VanHorn Justin F Harvey Kevin A Terry Colin Bieberich Andrew A Altenburg Jeffrey D Siddiqui Rafat A |
author_sort |
Jo Davisson V |
title |
A synergistic antiproliferation effect of curcumin and docosahexaenoic acid in SK-BR-3 breast cancer cells: unique signaling not explained by the effects of either compound alone |
title_short |
A synergistic antiproliferation effect of curcumin and docosahexaenoic acid in SK-BR-3 breast cancer cells: unique signaling not explained by the effects of either compound alone |
title_full |
A synergistic antiproliferation effect of curcumin and docosahexaenoic acid in SK-BR-3 breast cancer cells: unique signaling not explained by the effects of either compound alone |
title_fullStr |
A synergistic antiproliferation effect of curcumin and docosahexaenoic acid in SK-BR-3 breast cancer cells: unique signaling not explained by the effects of either compound alone |
title_full_unstemmed |
A synergistic antiproliferation effect of curcumin and docosahexaenoic acid in SK-BR-3 breast cancer cells: unique signaling not explained by the effects of either compound alone |
title_sort |
synergistic antiproliferation effect of curcumin and docosahexaenoic acid in sk-br-3 breast cancer cells: unique signaling not explained by the effects of either compound alone |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Cancer |
issn |
1471-2407 |
publishDate |
2011-04-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Breast cancer is a collection of diseases in which molecular phenotypes can act as both indicators and mediators of therapeutic strategy. Therefore, candidate therapeutics must be assessed in the context of multiple cell lines with known molecular phenotypes. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and curcumin (CCM) are dietary compounds known to antagonize breast cancer cell proliferation. We report that these compounds in combination exert a variable antiproliferative effect across multiple breast cell lines, which is synergistic in SK-BR-3 cells and triggers cell signaling events not predicted by the activity of either compound alone.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Dose response curves for CCM and DHA were generated for five breast cell lines. Effects of the DHA+ CCM combination on cell proliferation were evaluated using varying concentrations, at a fixed ratio, of CCM and DHA based on their individual ED<sub>50</sub>. Detection of synergy was performed using nonlinear regression of a sigmoid dose response model and Combination Index approaches. Cell molecular network responses were investigated through whole genome microarray analysis of transcript level changes. Gene expression results were validated by RT-PCR, and western blot analysis was performed for potential signaling mediators. Cellular curcumin uptake, with and without DHA, was analyzed via flow cytometry and HPLC.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>CCM+DHA had an antiproliferative effect in SK-BR-3, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-361, MCF7 and MCF10AT cells. The effect was synergistic for SK-BR-3 (ER<sup>- </sup>PR<sup>- </sup>Her2<sup>+</sup>) relative to the two compounds individually. A whole genome microarray approach was used to investigate changes in gene expression for the synergistic effects of CCM+DHA in SK-BR-3 cells lines. CCM+DHA triggered transcript-level responses, in disease-relevant functional categories, that were largely non-overlapping with changes caused by CCM or DHA individually. Genes involved in cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, inhibition of metastasis, and cell adhesion were upregulated, whereas genes involved in cancer development and progression, metastasis, and cell cycle progression were downregulated. Cellular pools of PPARγ and phospho-p53 were increased by CCM+DHA relative to either compound alone. DHA enhanced cellular uptake of CCM in SK-BR-3 cells without significantly enhancing CCM uptake in other cell lines.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The combination of DHA and CCM is potentially a dietary supplemental treatment for some breast cancers, likely dependent upon molecular phenotype. DHA enhancement of cellular curcumin uptake is one potential mechanism for observed synergy in SK-BR-3 cells; however, transcriptomic data show that the antiproliferation synergy accompanies many signaling events unique to the combined presence of the two compounds.</p> |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/11/149 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jodavissonv asynergisticantiproliferationeffectofcurcuminanddocosahexaenoicacidinskbr3breastcancercellsuniquesignalingnotexplainedbytheeffectsofeithercompoundalone AT xuzhidong asynergisticantiproliferationeffectofcurcuminanddocosahexaenoicacidinskbr3breastcancercellsuniquesignalingnotexplainedbytheeffectsofeithercompoundalone AT vanhornjustinf asynergisticantiproliferationeffectofcurcuminanddocosahexaenoicacidinskbr3breastcancercellsuniquesignalingnotexplainedbytheeffectsofeithercompoundalone AT harveykevina asynergisticantiproliferationeffectofcurcuminanddocosahexaenoicacidinskbr3breastcancercellsuniquesignalingnotexplainedbytheeffectsofeithercompoundalone AT terrycolin asynergisticantiproliferationeffectofcurcuminanddocosahexaenoicacidinskbr3breastcancercellsuniquesignalingnotexplainedbytheeffectsofeithercompoundalone AT bieberichandrewa asynergisticantiproliferationeffectofcurcuminanddocosahexaenoicacidinskbr3breastcancercellsuniquesignalingnotexplainedbytheeffectsofeithercompoundalone AT altenburgjeffreyd asynergisticantiproliferationeffectofcurcuminanddocosahexaenoicacidinskbr3breastcancercellsuniquesignalingnotexplainedbytheeffectsofeithercompoundalone AT siddiquirafata asynergisticantiproliferationeffectofcurcuminanddocosahexaenoicacidinskbr3breastcancercellsuniquesignalingnotexplainedbytheeffectsofeithercompoundalone AT jodavissonv synergisticantiproliferationeffectofcurcuminanddocosahexaenoicacidinskbr3breastcancercellsuniquesignalingnotexplainedbytheeffectsofeithercompoundalone AT xuzhidong synergisticantiproliferationeffectofcurcuminanddocosahexaenoicacidinskbr3breastcancercellsuniquesignalingnotexplainedbytheeffectsofeithercompoundalone AT vanhornjustinf synergisticantiproliferationeffectofcurcuminanddocosahexaenoicacidinskbr3breastcancercellsuniquesignalingnotexplainedbytheeffectsofeithercompoundalone AT harveykevina synergisticantiproliferationeffectofcurcuminanddocosahexaenoicacidinskbr3breastcancercellsuniquesignalingnotexplainedbytheeffectsofeithercompoundalone AT terrycolin synergisticantiproliferationeffectofcurcuminanddocosahexaenoicacidinskbr3breastcancercellsuniquesignalingnotexplainedbytheeffectsofeithercompoundalone AT bieberichandrewa synergisticantiproliferationeffectofcurcuminanddocosahexaenoicacidinskbr3breastcancercellsuniquesignalingnotexplainedbytheeffectsofeithercompoundalone AT altenburgjeffreyd synergisticantiproliferationeffectofcurcuminanddocosahexaenoicacidinskbr3breastcancercellsuniquesignalingnotexplainedbytheeffectsofeithercompoundalone AT siddiquirafata synergisticantiproliferationeffectofcurcuminanddocosahexaenoicacidinskbr3breastcancercellsuniquesignalingnotexplainedbytheeffectsofeithercompoundalone |
_version_ |
1725813459460816896 |