Column: The Science of Digital Forensics: Recovery of Data from Overwritten Areas of Magnetic Media

<p>Seeking to understand the state of scientific consensus surrounding an area of forensics is often problematic. You cannot prove a claim about an unlimited set in the sense of testing every possibility. And yet there is a level of consensus surrounding the science of the day.<br />This...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fred Cohen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association of Digital Forensics, Security and Law 2012-12-01
Series:Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law
Online Access:http://ojs.jdfsl.org/index.php/jdfsl/article/view/149
id doaj-9400dbe44e154b0a8ac8637a43725627
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9400dbe44e154b0a8ac8637a437256272020-11-25T00:30:23ZengAssociation of Digital Forensics, Security and LawJournal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law1558-72151558-72232012-12-017472072Column: The Science of Digital Forensics: Recovery of Data from Overwritten Areas of Magnetic MediaFred Cohen0Fred Cohen & Associates<p>Seeking to understand the state of scientific consensus surrounding an area of forensics is often problematic. You cannot prove a claim about an unlimited set in the sense of testing every possibility. And yet there is a level of consensus surrounding the science of the day.<br />This is a slightly altered portion of an expert report I wrote recently, released with permission, that I thought might serve as an example of how to go about seeking the truth and presenting the state of the science when truly definitive statements based on first principles are not available. Of course, I look forward to the readership proving me wrong with real-world examples, but somehow, I doubt if I will find any.</p><p>(see PDF for full column)</p>http://ojs.jdfsl.org/index.php/jdfsl/article/view/149
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fred Cohen
spellingShingle Fred Cohen
Column: The Science of Digital Forensics: Recovery of Data from Overwritten Areas of Magnetic Media
Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law
author_facet Fred Cohen
author_sort Fred Cohen
title Column: The Science of Digital Forensics: Recovery of Data from Overwritten Areas of Magnetic Media
title_short Column: The Science of Digital Forensics: Recovery of Data from Overwritten Areas of Magnetic Media
title_full Column: The Science of Digital Forensics: Recovery of Data from Overwritten Areas of Magnetic Media
title_fullStr Column: The Science of Digital Forensics: Recovery of Data from Overwritten Areas of Magnetic Media
title_full_unstemmed Column: The Science of Digital Forensics: Recovery of Data from Overwritten Areas of Magnetic Media
title_sort column: the science of digital forensics: recovery of data from overwritten areas of magnetic media
publisher Association of Digital Forensics, Security and Law
series Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law
issn 1558-7215
1558-7223
publishDate 2012-12-01
description <p>Seeking to understand the state of scientific consensus surrounding an area of forensics is often problematic. You cannot prove a claim about an unlimited set in the sense of testing every possibility. And yet there is a level of consensus surrounding the science of the day.<br />This is a slightly altered portion of an expert report I wrote recently, released with permission, that I thought might serve as an example of how to go about seeking the truth and presenting the state of the science when truly definitive statements based on first principles are not available. Of course, I look forward to the readership proving me wrong with real-world examples, but somehow, I doubt if I will find any.</p><p>(see PDF for full column)</p>
url http://ojs.jdfsl.org/index.php/jdfsl/article/view/149
work_keys_str_mv AT fredcohen columnthescienceofdigitalforensicsrecoveryofdatafromoverwrittenareasofmagneticmedia
_version_ 1725326978900295680