Column: The Science of Digital Forensics: Recovery of Data from Overwritten Areas of Magnetic Media
<p>Seeking to understand the state of scientific consensus surrounding an area of forensics is often problematic. You cannot prove a claim about an unlimited set in the sense of testing every possibility. And yet there is a level of consensus surrounding the science of the day.<br />This...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Association of Digital Forensics, Security and Law
2012-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law |
Online Access: | http://ojs.jdfsl.org/index.php/jdfsl/article/view/149 |
id |
doaj-9400dbe44e154b0a8ac8637a43725627 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9400dbe44e154b0a8ac8637a437256272020-11-25T00:30:23ZengAssociation of Digital Forensics, Security and LawJournal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law1558-72151558-72232012-12-017472072Column: The Science of Digital Forensics: Recovery of Data from Overwritten Areas of Magnetic MediaFred Cohen0Fred Cohen & Associates<p>Seeking to understand the state of scientific consensus surrounding an area of forensics is often problematic. You cannot prove a claim about an unlimited set in the sense of testing every possibility. And yet there is a level of consensus surrounding the science of the day.<br />This is a slightly altered portion of an expert report I wrote recently, released with permission, that I thought might serve as an example of how to go about seeking the truth and presenting the state of the science when truly definitive statements based on first principles are not available. Of course, I look forward to the readership proving me wrong with real-world examples, but somehow, I doubt if I will find any.</p><p>(see PDF for full column)</p>http://ojs.jdfsl.org/index.php/jdfsl/article/view/149 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fred Cohen |
spellingShingle |
Fred Cohen Column: The Science of Digital Forensics: Recovery of Data from Overwritten Areas of Magnetic Media Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law |
author_facet |
Fred Cohen |
author_sort |
Fred Cohen |
title |
Column: The Science of Digital Forensics: Recovery of Data from Overwritten Areas of Magnetic Media |
title_short |
Column: The Science of Digital Forensics: Recovery of Data from Overwritten Areas of Magnetic Media |
title_full |
Column: The Science of Digital Forensics: Recovery of Data from Overwritten Areas of Magnetic Media |
title_fullStr |
Column: The Science of Digital Forensics: Recovery of Data from Overwritten Areas of Magnetic Media |
title_full_unstemmed |
Column: The Science of Digital Forensics: Recovery of Data from Overwritten Areas of Magnetic Media |
title_sort |
column: the science of digital forensics: recovery of data from overwritten areas of magnetic media |
publisher |
Association of Digital Forensics, Security and Law |
series |
Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law |
issn |
1558-7215 1558-7223 |
publishDate |
2012-12-01 |
description |
<p>Seeking to understand the state of scientific consensus surrounding an area of forensics is often problematic. You cannot prove a claim about an unlimited set in the sense of testing every possibility. And yet there is a level of consensus surrounding the science of the day.<br />This is a slightly altered portion of an expert report I wrote recently, released with permission, that I thought might serve as an example of how to go about seeking the truth and presenting the state of the science when truly definitive statements based on first principles are not available. Of course, I look forward to the readership proving me wrong with real-world examples, but somehow, I doubt if I will find any.</p><p>(see PDF for full column)</p> |
url |
http://ojs.jdfsl.org/index.php/jdfsl/article/view/149 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fredcohen columnthescienceofdigitalforensicsrecoveryofdatafromoverwrittenareasofmagneticmedia |
_version_ |
1725326978900295680 |